Post Hoc Fallacy Paper

Decent Essays
For this week’s assignment, I was given information on eight types of fallacies listed in the video by TheHtownusa. I have chosen to do my paper on the Post Hoc Fallacy, because it is one I have personally used on numerous occasions. In this paper I will tell you the meaning of this fallacy and the error in reasoning that happens while using it. You will also find a few strategies that will help me in trying to avoid this fallacy. With this I will learn what this fallacy is, how this error is committed, and how to avoid this fallacy in the future.
The Post Hoc Fallacy is derived from the Latin “Post hoc, ergo propter hoc” meaning “after this, therefore because of this”. The Post hoc fallacy is, as defined by Labossiere (1991), when it is concluded

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Red Herring The first fallacy is an example of a Red Herring, which has no latin translation. A red herring is a fallacy that draws the argument away from the issue currently being discussed to an argument that the person feels they can better relate to.…

    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In “Spot Fallacies: The Seven Deadly Logical Sins”, Jay Heinrichs tries to warn the people of the common fallacies that are used in one’s daily life and tries to explain how they can be caught. Mainly Heinrichs targets politics and the tactics that infest politics. He is speaking to the common voter on how politicians use these fallacies can be caught and disproven, so citizens will not be led astray. Aside from his whole article Heinrichs breaks it down to “Bad proof, Bad conclusion, Disconnect between proof and conclusions” (Heinrichs, 169). For example, he talks about the fallacy of antecedent, where he explains that someone who says something will never happen because it hasn’t occurred in the past, therefore, it won’t occur in the future…

    • 272 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The study of rhetoric today is dying. Thank You for Arguing wants to change that. By introducing rhetoric as a useful everyday tool Thank You for Arguing hopes to revive the mass knowledge and use of rhetoric in everyday conversations. Thank You for Arguing is an excellent book and by giving excellent examples combined with emotion and tools to use logic in an argument it excels in introducing such a vague concept as rhetoric and should have continued use in schools. Thank You for Arguing, written by Jay Heinrichs in February of 2007, brings rhetoric into another light that appeals to the common person that continues to hold a place on Harvard’s top 10 reading list because of its value.…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the evaluation there were a few rhetorical devices that were used. Here are a few that were utilized. First is Diction which was skillfully used in this chapter. "Guilt doesn't go anywhere far enough; the appropriate emotion is shame - shame at our own dependency, in this case, on the underpaid labor of others (221)".…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Classic Trickster’s represent the traits of sly, cunning, quick thinking, mischievous, recognition. Trickster’s will try to repeatedly annoy the gods to make a name for themselves, or they will commit an act of great proportions that will be heard by their respective realms. Some trickster's can be born into a position of power and commit mischievous deeds, but others use those mischievous deeds to gain a position of power. Hermes, from Greek Mythology, used a mischievous act at a young age to gain notoriety and a position of power later in his life. Rather, from Norse Mythology, Loki, already in a position of power, did mischievous acts directed at the gods.…

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A Case For Rhetoric Debate and argument are a pinnacle foundation of speech in the world. Jay Heinrichs Thank You For Arguing: What Aristotle, Lincoln, and Homer Simpson Can Teach Us About the Art of Persuasion, is like the bible of rhetoric and argument. Heinrichs is a former editor of many different publishers including: Rodale Inc., and Dartmouth Alumni Magazine. His book, is the leading book in the introduction to rhetoric, and is used in thousands of classrooms every year.…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Arguing is the act of persuading someone to follow you in your ideas and benefit from the situation. Jay Heinrichs, the author of Thank You for Arguing, Third Edition: What Aristotle, Lincoln, and Homer Simpson Can Teach Us About the Art of Persuasion, has been a writer for over 30 years and has nearly perfected the art of arguing and/or persuasion. Within his book Thank You for Arguing you are taught all about the act of arguing and how if differs from a fight. The act of arguing can be managed by rhetoric teachings, decorum, and influential persuasion which is why this book should continue to be used. Thank You for Arguing is a book written to improve your skills of persuasion and show you how it can be done by giving personal and real life examples.…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Summer Reading Assignment: Thank You for Arguing The introduction of Thank You for Arguing covers a brief history of rhetoric, introducing its beginnings in ancient Greece and its impact on Roman orators. Jay Heinrichs details the effect of rhetoric on America’s founders, the principles used in the making of the Bible and the Constitution, and how it inspired Shakespeare and Cicero, as well as how rhetoric has faded since the 1800s. Heinrichs declares his purpose for writing Thank You for Arguing as to “lead you through this ill-known world of argument…to use logic as a convincing tool, smacking down fallacies and building airtight assertions” (Heinrichs 5). Heinrichs hooks his audience by using the very thing he teaches about: rhetoric.…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The best way to persuade people to believe or accept an idea is to make them believe that they themselves came to the conclusion alone, and the best way to achieve this goal is to preset them with the information which supports the claim one is attempting to make. Mr. Steven Cummins demonstrates this skill when making the statement, “just building supermarkets to increase access will only take you half of the way in improving diet” (Cummins 16) by adding the figure “half of the way” he is able to support his claim that the addition of a grocery store does, in fact, not change the eating habits of the residents close to the grocery store. By adding an additional layer of support to his claims Mr. Steven Cummins is able to strengthen his overall argument. Another Mrs. Laura McKinney has, through his own separately conducted study, also come to the conclusion that the addition of a simple grocery store is not nearly enough to make a significant impact on food desert residents, “our study shows that food access is shaped by multiple interacting factors that are often not directly related to food outlets’ location or what food is available at these stores” (McKinney 41). Because Mrs. Laure McKinney has come to such a similar deduction as Mr. Steven Cummins through her own means of study, their arguments can be more easily accepted as…

    • 1067 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rhetorical Argument

    • 1309 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Rhetorical Appeal by Arrangement of Classical Oration Introduction It has been discussed since the end of 20th century that the mothers in employment and at home have different attitudes towards to motherhood and work. Two articles which I would like to pick up are describing this debates as well. One article is written by Paula K. McDonald, Lisa M. Bradley, and Diane Guthrie in 2005. Another one is authored by Gillian Marks and Diane M. Houston in 2002.…

    • 1309 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The art of persuading an audience to think a certain way about a specific topic is not as simplistic as many believe. Therefore, the persuaders often have to utilize certain strategies in order to strengthen their views, which in the end gives them the upper hand. Throughout this essay, I will be discussing how my previous essays directly correlate to one other in many different ways including the utilization of multiple articles, rhetorical strategies, and the use of ATCC (Author, Title, Credibility, Claim) and analysis as to why the essays contains these writing strategies. First off, in my essays one and three they both posses rhetorical strategies that are used to strengthen the authors objective and make their points more credible to the reader. These essays are specifically focused around modern day technology and how people function in today’s society.…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    While reading chapter five, Fallacies of Argument, and chapter six, Rhetorical Analysis, there were key words that stood out to me that related to the podcast, Researchers Study Effects Of Social Media On Young Minds. Fallacies are argumentative moves flawed by their very nature or structure. There are fallacies of emotional argument, such as bandwagon appeals, which is when we urge people to follow the same path everyone else is taking. Continuing, fallacies of ethical arguments are important to think about when determining an argumentative writing piece; stacking the deck means that the person talking is showing only one side of the story, going with ethical arguments in writing. Rhetorical Analysis is the analyzing of how well the components…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Teacher Candidate Jessica Grooms Date and Time of Lesson 7:50-9:07 a.m. School Westview Middle School Subject/Grade Level English Language Arts 7th Grade Description of Lesson: After Students read Mueller’s article of “Two Sides to Every Coin: Are Professional Athletes Overpaid?”, students will create a concept map to begin an argumentative essay. Students will learn to use phrases to connect ideas in different areas of the map and create a better understanding of the topic by connecting the information in a different way. Lesson Title: Building an Argument For/Against If Professional Athletes are Overpaid Curriculum Standards Addressed: National Standard(s) IRA/NCTE 3.…

    • 1560 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the logical fallacies that I found is Post hoc ergo propter hoc, which means the author assumes that one event causes the other. For example “Times of carnival temporally marginalize the monstrous, but at the same time allow it a safe realm of expression and play: on Halloween everyone is a demon for a night” (Cohen, 191). The author is assuming that in Halloween most people dress up as the monster they desire to be, which led all the expression to come up and also the real actions that a human have by dressing up as a monster. Another logical fallacy found in Cohen article is Begging the Claim, in which the author uses enough evidence to support his claim.…

    • 1127 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    One Event Engraved in Our Memories This is a day that Americans, and many others, will never forget. This day will forever be engraved into the minds of the people of the United States of America. September 11, 2001, a day remembered as 9/11, consisted of many different events, but this day is remembered for the four passenger airliners that were hijacked by the al-Qaeda, who planned a series of “strategically conducted events” (History.com). These unexpected events created a change in the history of the United States.…

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays