The concept of self-actualization is defined as reaching one’s full potential as a human being. The concept originates from and organismic meta-theory meaning humans are not born empty to be filled, but are actively in pursuit of actualization. Humans are genetically setup to thrive in their environment in the best way possible if given the correct tools. The Self Determination Theory is used to explain actualization and defines it as normal human potentials. The theory assumes that humans want to be proactive to move toward refinement and integration in self-functioning, (Deci, Ryan, & Guay, 2013). Full-functioning is another phrase for self-actualization and is theoretically linked to eudaimonic well-being, (Bauer, J. J., Schwab, J.
…show more content…
There is usually a tangible reward. There are differing degrees of autonomy in this behavior ranging from integrated to internalized. The lowest degree of autonomy is external extrinsic behavior, where there is no internalization whatsoever. The behavior is solely based on external rewards, like punishment, for example. There can be negative consequences of external extrinsic behavior. College students who choose their major based on what their parents want them to do, and not what they want, will ultimately be unhappy and would likely end up using negative coping skills to deal with their unhappiness. Introjected extrinsic behavior is the next highest degree of autonomy and includes partial internalization. The behavior exists within the person as a form of control and could result in shame or guilt as a consequence. For example, a young girl with an eating disorder would tell herself she can not eat unless she throws up her food. If the girl ate and did not throw up her food, she would feel shame and guilt. The next highest degree after introjection is identified extrinsic behavior. This behavior includes choice and volition that is important for personal and professional development. An example of this behavior is when one eats healthy because they know it is what’s best for them. This behavior is part of one’s values and
There is usually a tangible reward. There are differing degrees of autonomy in this behavior ranging from integrated to internalized. The lowest degree of autonomy is external extrinsic behavior, where there is no internalization whatsoever. The behavior is solely based on external rewards, like punishment, for example. There can be negative consequences of external extrinsic behavior. College students who choose their major based on what their parents want them to do, and not what they want, will ultimately be unhappy and would likely end up using negative coping skills to deal with their unhappiness. Introjected extrinsic behavior is the next highest degree of autonomy and includes partial internalization. The behavior exists within the person as a form of control and could result in shame or guilt as a consequence. For example, a young girl with an eating disorder would tell herself she can not eat unless she throws up her food. If the girl ate and did not throw up her food, she would feel shame and guilt. The next highest degree after introjection is identified extrinsic behavior. This behavior includes choice and volition that is important for personal and professional development. An example of this behavior is when one eats healthy because they know it is what’s best for them. This behavior is part of one’s values and