The claim charged that the organizations contracted sweatshop work in Saipan, a U.S. District, and ought to be considered responsible for laborer treatment and conditions for working on U.S. soil. The lawsuit was that more than 13,000 garment workers in Saipan consistently worked 12-hour days, seven days a week, in many cases off the clock without getting any compensation or extra minutes. According to greenamerica.org the claim additionally blamed the organizations for working a "racketeering conspiracy" through which laborers, who are generally young ladies, sign contracts deferring their human rights and paid enrollment expenses of up to $10,000 to secure sweatshop positions (5). By consenting to the settlement, the organizations acknowledged no wrongdoing. In 2004, Polo had an official licensee of a processing plant in Hong Kong where working conditions have been abused. There were many acts that violated the international labor standards. For example, laborers would receive pay that was lower than the minimum wage set by the Chinese Government. Workers were asked to sign short-term, one year, contracts, of which they were not given a copy. This is one strategy for taking away the benefits and medicinal services obligations that go with longer term work. Finally, laborers experienced pay delays, …show more content…
Some of its immediate rivals try to introduce to increase demand request, while other organizations attempt to copy the designs made by Polo. To compete, Polo Ralph Lauren must remain regarded as a pioneer of value, fashion and venture into other markets. The Polo Ralph Lauren brand name is a part of the companies most profitable branches. Polo Ralph Lauren 's clients realize that when purchasing its products, they are purchasing quality stock and a highly regarded brand name at a reasonable cost. Sales at retail stores pull in clients with less spending power, however clients are for the most part ready to pay the costs associated with Polo 's