Moral Theory In Political Decision Making

Improved Essays
The political arena for decision making amongst various groups, societies, nations and so on, have always been a complex and tedious process to ultimately come to a fair conclusion. One key factor within this process of finding possible solutions is taking into consideration a moral high ground so to speak, or in another words a moral principle perspective within the political decision making process. Providing a human moral based analysis of any issue at hand on a political bases simply further increases the complexities and variables of the negotiation process itself. One may argue that a moral perspective shouldn’t be necessary within the political negotiation process itself as it further increases the complexities of the issues at hand. This stance however is simply flawed in its own nature due to the simple fact that the political negotiation process cannot exist without the human element involved. …show more content…
There are consequently many varying factors and areas of dispute when it comes to the application of moral theory with regards to finding legitimate solutions to the issues that the people of today are up against. However, it must be noted that political decision making itself could not exist without the presences of morals. The application of moral theory within political decision making undoubtedly further complicates the process as a whole, as it additionally takes into consideration many other varying factors that must be given the time of day as they are legitimate influences that shape the overall solution or solutions at the end. However, it is through this long and tedious process in which many factors and different perspectives are sorted out and organized to a point in which moral theory is able to be at the forefront of discussion with any issue at hand and ultimately be major shaping factor for a legitimate, fair and just solution to put

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    There are few empirical studies conducted to test the validity of the proposed models. Cienki (2004, 2005a, 2005b) are the first contribution to the linguistic investigation of the models. He merged between the quantitative and qualitative approaches. Cienki (2004) conducted an analysis in order to empirically testing Lakoff’s models. His corpus was a televised debates between George W. Bush and Al Gore before the US before the presidential campaign in October 2000.…

    • 2212 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It is presented when a number of good and important ethical values are inherently incompatible. There are values and principles that require a wide understanding of world facts…

    • 1532 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Politics and ethics are two vital components of a functioning society. When these two components are carefully balanced a sate/society can remain organized and fair to its citizens. In a realistic society the idea of what political ethics and human nature consist of varies, but in an idealistic society political ethics and human nature possess a common ground. Political ethics and human nature were a mutual understanding at some point but as societies grew, citizens began to think as individuals instead of as a collective. As a result of this self-serving behavior, inequality and the mistreatment of others quickly followed.…

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Faith And Diplomacy

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Decisions we make today shape the world we will see tomorrow. That’s why making ethical decisions is extremely important to make the world a better place to live. In his essay “Ethics and the New Genetics,” philosopher Tenzin Gyatso, the spiritual leader of the Central Tibetan Administration and the fourteenth Dalai Lama, asserts that our power is inextricably entwined with our moral responsibility. In her essay “Faith and Diplomacy,” Madeleine Albright, a professor at Georgetown University and former U.S Secretary of State, argues that religion is a force that can be used in international communications. Both essays emphasize the importance of making ethical decisions.…

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Furthermore, in order to balance out this contradictory system of morality, power needs to be placed in the hands of people with outcome-based thinking. People in high positions of power do not enact change that is necessary for a growing society. They defend the status quo and tend to focus on the principles that support the current system in operation. The low-power, outcome-based thinkers recognize negative attributes and have a desire to change them (Lammers 280). King exhibits outcome-based thinking when he discusses the process of nonviolent direct action and how the results of each situation is greatly analyzed before making any strides (1-2).…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    To what extent is Natural Law the best approach to ethical decision making? (10 Marks) It could be argued that Natural Law isn’t the best approach to ethical decision making as well as it is. Natural Law is the philosophical view of St Thomas Aquinas on the kind rules humans should follow in their everyday life.…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are many views and values people consume today. It is becoming more prevalent in our country with the 2016 Presidential Election taking place. In our country, we have people that are democrats, republicans and liberals.…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Individuals hold distinct values and often conclude their interpretation of the world is true and right. It is this complex fusion of values and beliefs that lead to ethical dilemmas. Newman and Pollnitz (2005, page 108) describe ethics as what we perceive to be the right course of action, what we…

    • 1986 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Many people have justifications for why they do certain things. Some justifications are based off of happiness, desires, god or morals. People who use happiness and desires as their justification use theories of the good. While those who use god and morals use theories of morality. Some theories that fall into the theories of morality are the divine command theory, consequentialism, and social contract theory.…

    • 1327 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Johnathan Haidt is a Professor of Ethical Leadership and social psychologist at NYU’s Stern School of Business. He wrote the book, The Righteous Mind to “at least do what we can to understand why we are so easily divided into hostile groups, each one certain of its righteousness.” He states: “My goal in this book is to drain some of the heat, anger, and divisiveness out of these topics and replace them with awe, wonder, and curiosity.” In light of America’s increasingly unreasonable political polarity and developing shared mistrust, it is obvious that Haidt has a lot of work on his hands.…

    • 831 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Morgenthau’s fifth principle states that each nation has different understandings of their moral code. Political realism explains that the moral laws that a state abides by don’t apply to the actions the state takes. The actions taken are in hopes of gaining more national power. It is known that each culture has different values. What may be of an important value to one culture could be of little to no value to another.…

    • 222 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    People often argue the inseparability of morality from politics because in theory, the all-encompassing political sphere consists of the ‘deliberative inclusive search’ for a shared notion of a ‘good’ life. This collaborative effort to create a co-existing, co-operative environment involves the government and the governed. For the purposes of this paper, I will reduce the latter to the ‘individual’. Occasionally, there are competing interests between the individual and the authority. Within this adversarial domain, the justification of ‘obedience to’ and ‘disobedience of’ come into question.…

    • 1596 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Anslinger began a dishonest campaign against cannabis that would last over the next eighty years. Conservatives accepted his false claims and continued to spread propaganda that highlighted the dangers of marijuana use and its users. However, although some conservatives may have been motivated by greed and racism, others believed that they were doing the right thing according to their system of moral beliefs. In Moral Politics, George Lakoff explores “two different models of ideal family life [that] motivates corresponding sets of metaphorical priorities, each of which constitutes a distinct moral system” (65).…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the last Chapter, Rachels discusses the creation of a "Satisfactory Moral Theory”, in this paper I will discuss my own creation of the Satisfactory Moral Theory. The moral theories are supposed to help us decide what are the right and wrong actions, but, not all the moral theories are perfect. We may feel that a certain conclusion to a problem is fair or unfair, but what theory do we use to make judgments?. I will start with the cultural relativism theory, to understand different cultures, There is a need to know that one community’s beliefs and practices are not usually the same as the other community. In fact, cultural relativism seems the most applicable approach to be taken on for communications purposes.…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In “Political Action: The Problem of Dirty Hands”, Walzer addresses the conflict between morality and politics, and questions whether or not a moral, political actor is even possible. In light of earlier theorists, such as Machiavelli and Weber, Walzer argues that it is extremely likely for political actors to encounter “dirty hand” problems, in which the actor may have to sacrifice moral principles to make the “right” decision. Walzer argues that, whilst this is an inevitability for politicians, they can still be considered “moral”, meeting both moral-absolutist and consequentialist demands (Litvin, 2011), provided they do what is politically necessary, but understands themselves to be guilty as a result. To construct this argument, Walzer…

    • 912 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics