Documents 1, 3 ,4 ,6 and 10 are all examples of the influence of political interests on the modern Olympics. These documents illustrate how political tensions and pride for one’s country shaped the Olympics of the modern era. Document 1 describes Pierre de Coubertin’s attempt to convince the Athletic Society of France to help him revive the Ancient Olympic Games. He states that by sending athletes of each country into other countries for the games, the “true trade of the future” may be constructed as peace is created between nations. Coubertin believes this will lead to less wars between countries, and he hopes that the Olympics will promote peace and harmony between nations. This political aspiration was not only the goal of the modern Olympics movement, but also of the original Olympic games in Ancient Greece which was created to nurture peace between the differing city states of the time. Documents 3 and 4 show how political rivalries can influence the games. In document 3, Arnold Lunn, a British Olympic team official at the 1936 German games prior to World War II, makes the case that Nazi German Olympians believed that the Olympics were not just a competition to determine who is the best at a certain sport (skiing in this example) but also to decide which country’s method of …show more content…
Lunn also states that Nazis will use any means to achieve this goal and claims that Nazis will protest any challengeable decision in order to gain a small advantage to support his argument. The modern Olympics were shaped by the determination with which countries such as Nazi Germany strove to showcase and demonstrate their power in the games. Document 3 shows how the rivalry between two countries (Britain and Nazi Germany) can affect the Olympics. Likewise,