How Did Jefferson And Hamilton Influence Political Parties

Superior Essays
In devising the Constitution for the new government, the founders were too confident that the political parties would play no formal role in the government. Thus, they wrote no word in the Constitution regarding the political parties. For the initial eight years of the America’s presence, George Washington, the first America’s President, had brought a unifying and harmony vicinity in the country. In a few years after 1789, still, he was able to practice the unbiased leadership on the new government. Yet, through the weaknesses of the Constitution’s essences, there came the two influential political parties at the end of his presidential years. Both sides rose amid the middle of Washington 's second term, and Washington was not satisfied. Each of them arose with their own …show more content…
The conflicts between Jefferson and Hamilton actually disturbed Washington, who wrote to both men in August 1792 to express his annoyed feeling towards them. Washington primary concern was about the foreign policy by the time the two parties were arising. At the time the major war approached following to the French Revolution, he rather chose to stay neutral and waited for the United States to grow strong instead of taking the suggestion from either Jefferson who was pro-France or Hamilton who was the loyal supporter of Britain. To this first America’s President, he believed that appearances of different perspectives were critical for the wellbeing of the new government; however he was bothered at what he saw as a rising partisanship. Emergence of the two political parties would just crack the country and rendered outsider to one another the individuals who should be united by intimate devotion. Letters composed by Washington before his farewell was mainly to beg for Americans to set aside their disparities and stayed bound

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Jefferson was a strong believer in strict construction, which was abiding to what the Constitution specifically states, and not stretching its boundaries. This belief would affect the choices he made for this country. Hamilton believed in loose construction, which is the complete opposite of Jefferson’s idea, and was also pro-British, where Jefferson was pro-French. These disagreements would cause these two men to clash, causing Jefferson to step down since Washington was more influenced…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    He, like Hamilton, understood that the rebellion in France would soon spread throughout Europe and abroad. Unlike Hamilton, however, Jefferson believed that the spread of radical French ideologies was tantamount to preserving the American constitution, “I consider the establishment and success of their government as necessary to stay up our own and to prevent it from falling back to that kind of Halfway-house, the English constitution” (108). Comparatively speaking though, Jefferson’s idealistic stance on American and French relations proved more dangerous to the U.S. than Hamilton’s. His initial views were, in retrospect, Machiavellian in that he believed that the ends would ultimately justify the means, “The liberty of the whole earth was depending on the issue of the contest, and was ever such a prize won with so little innocent blood?” (109).…

    • 1398 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Washington stated in his farewell address of the dangers of the party system that was rising in the United States and believed the party system would lead to instability and division among the citizens of the United States. Washington’s warning was not heeded and the political parties rose in power for the next election growing the destabilization caused by the political parties. George Washington’s Presidential policies and actions created mostly a stable government with some slightly unstable policies and…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    England and France went back into war during 1793. However, both Hamilton and Jefferson wanted America to remain neutral; the only problem was that both individuals held their own biases towards the situation. On one end of the spectrum, Jefferson held a soft spot for the french after serving in France as an ambassador during the American Revolution and because he didn’t want to announce America’s neutrality, he wanted to keep the British guessing what America’s next move would be as a source of leverage. Hamilton on the other hand, felt that they should be upfront about their neutrality because he not only looked up to, but also appreciated the British and if their neutrality wasn’t clear, the British would automatically assume that America would sign with the French, therefore, they would have to protect Canada. Trying to prove that our neutrality was nothing but a weakness, the British proposed that they were going to violate the Treaty of Paris, as well as implement the Council of Orders.…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his farewell address, George Washington addressed the new two-party system, “However [political parties] may now and then answer popular ends, they are likely in the course of time and things, to become potent engines, by which cunning, ambitious, and unprincipled men will be enabled to subvert the power of the people and to usurp for themselves the reins of government, destroying afterwards the very engines which have lifted them to unjust dominion” (Washington). Although George Washington understood the need for the two-party system, he was fearful that in the end it would evolve into something completely different that would endanger the democracy. Since the creation of the two-party system over 200 years ago, the parties certainly have…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    George Washington, being a wise and an experienced president, warned the individuals of the United States of America to not use factions, as this concept would not be beneficial for the newly made independent nation. Historical figures such as Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson decided not to listen to Washington’s plead. Both men created two political parties that reflected one another’s beliefs. Hamilton stood behind the Federalist party as Jefferson did the same for the Democratic-Republican party, which is also known as the Republicans. Each party had opposing views of one another.…

    • 1029 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the period of Washington’s campaign the United States was fairly new and states for the most part governed themselves. States were governing themselves to exercise their new freedom from the centralized government that they all were use to with Great Britain. There were so many thoughts on how the new world should be constructed that this caused problems such as each state wanting their own to the laws of individual’s rights. The lack of a central set of laws l and the ability to control chaos when rebellions or other disturbances occurred was almost impossible. Individuals came together to try and uphold the new world that they had fought so hard to start, so this party moved forward with their vision for the United States.…

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hamiltonians In The 1790s

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The people of the Early Republic of the 1790s had very distinct, opposing views of one another on how the government should operate under a new constitution. These disputes stemmed from the adoption of beliefs from Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson, who originally were highly opposed to factions. Their ideas were vastly accepted by two different groups: the Hamiltonians and the Jeffersonians. The many issues they disagreed on were nearly opposite one another, and ultimately lead to the creation of the first party system consisting of the Federalists and Republicans. Initially, these two men were very much against factions.…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Political parties are such a key aspect to the society than the average United States citizen may think. They play an active role in our society and have been since the early days of America in the 1800’s. Looking back into history, it reveals the true functions of the political parties that play a factor into how the people of early America were impacted by them. The American government system would be nowhere if it were not due to the building of the political party groups. Many people know the political parties as two or more groups trying to fight each other for election, which is true, but they also check on the other party, influence the public, as well as inform the public about the other and any wrong doings that they commit.…

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The election of President Washington was not a turning point in the American political party system, due to the lack of changes in the system as a direct result of his election; rather, the election of Thomas Jefferson as president served as a focal turning point in the change of the political party system in America because of the way it introduced changes that would gradually begin altering the system. The election of President Washington was not a turning point in the political party system of America. At the time of George Washington’s election, the Federalist and Antifederalist schools of thought had already been fully developed, and did not change due to Washington’s election. A few years later, these groups were replaced by the Federalist…

    • 973 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The existence of political parties can be dated back to the pre-revolutionary Whigs and Tories that arrived to the colonies from Great Britain. As the need for a division in politics subsided, these parties became less official factions. However, when the issues of the territory began to change, the presence of factions began to change. The evolution of factions into rivaling political parties in the 1790s resulted from contrasting views between Thomas Jefferson’s Republicans and Alexander Hamilton’s Federalists due to different beliefs in regards to the Constitution’s power and the impact of foreign policy and economic growth on the young United States.…

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In 1787, the Continental Congress was brought together in the Philadelphia Convention to revise the Articles of Confederation. The Constitution was written and since people had different views on how to interpret it, two political parties were eventually formed: The federalists and the Democratic-Republicans. The main reason for the rise of political parties during the 1790s was because each of the parties favored different political and economical reforms needed as a new, developing country. Alexander Hamilton led the Federalists and they favored a loose interpretation of the Constitution, while Thomas Jefferson and the Democratic-Republican Party favored strict interpretation. The Federalists wanted to create a national economy by creating…

    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After America’s long journey of seeking freedom from governmental oppression, the newly formed nation was skeptical when it came to the discussion of new government authority. Many Americans were still uneasy about consolidated power, while others were aware of the prevalent national instability caused by the lack thereof. Though, in the end, the Constitution prevailed and has become the cornerstone of American government, the path that led to this enduring document was gradual and filled with apprehension and debate. Both sides of the issue had very clear and valid notions about either their support or opposition to the Constitution, and in the end were able to find common ground through patience and compromise.…

    • 1123 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Anhely Hernandez What Challenges did George Washington Face as President? Washington was no doubt a remarkable leader, even being credited as the primary reason behind America’s victory against Great Britain in the Revolutionary War. Despite this, Washington never wanted to be president as he considered it to be too much pressure, especially given the fact that he was 56 when he was elected. With his election came a whole slew of problems for Washington, most being economic issues that stemmed from his treasurer’s financial plan to pay back the nation’s debt. Another unhelpful bump in the road came in the form of Thomas Jefferson, who often clashed with Hamilton and his ideals, leading to a rift between the people that would eventually result in the political parties we have today.…

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States of America did not start out with political parties, as most are shocked to learn. President George Washington holds a very distinct honor, the only American non-partisan president. The truth be known, political parties did not develop until 1790’s as conflict grew over the vision of America’s future development. Two major parties arose, the Federalist (those with beliefs of international trade, manufacturing and large government).…

    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays