Police Force Confessions

Improved Essays
Show More
Before I begin, I would like to take this opportunity to say God Bless America, God Bless the Bill of Rights, and Thank God for the Fifth and Sixth Amendments. The reason for my optimism is due to the fact that 2016 happens to mark the fiftieth anniversary of the renowned Miranda v. Arizona Supreme Court Case. Arguably one of the most influential Supreme Court decisions of our nation’s history, Miranda’s case caused a revision on how authorities from all over the United States would forever handle arrests. The case began when a man named Ernesto Miranda, a Mexican immigrant from Phoenix, Arizona, was arrested after being identified as the culprit who sexually assaulted an eighteen-year-old woman. After approximately two hours in the fierce …show more content…
Here, police force confessions from suspects by taking advantage of everything they can control. As a matter of fact, in 1931, a presidential committee called the Wickersham Commission reported cases of police brutality in the interrogation room a myriad of times. Specifically, the use of whips, rubber hoses, and clubs have been used by police officers to induce confessions. However, whether it is a concentrated light shone upon you or long hours of questioning, police always have a psychological advantage in the interrogation room. Even today, police can lie and use other manipulative tactics to scourge a confession out of a suspect who just wants to go home. For this reason, it is no surprise that Miranda’s confession was drafted in such a room where he was not even aware of his …show more content…
Arizona did more than just make it harder for police to convict felons – it made suspects aware of their rights in the interrogation rooms, evened the playing field so the police no longer have an unethical advantage, and made police better at gathering solid evidence to prove a case. After all, the framers of the Constitution wrote the Bill of Rights to safeguard everyone’s individual liberties and to make it harder for police to deprive someone from them. Because of this, Miranda, the right to remain silent, and the right to counsel are more than just words. Commemorating the fiftieth anniversary, I can proudly Thank God for the Bill of Rights, and Thank God for the Fifth and Sixth

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Appellant V Luis Ortiz
    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Appellant V Luis Ortiz

    requirements of Miranda or whether the defendant knowingly and intelligently waived his rights”. (wicourts.gov) STATE of Iowa, Appellant, v. Luis Fernando ORTIZ, Appellee, This case was filed in the Supreme Court of Iowa and was decided in 2009. On July 15, 2006, a woman called the Sioux City Police Department to report that Luis Ortiz, who she hired to do remodeling work in her house, “had forced her seven-year-old daughter to touch his penis”. After a brief meeting with Ortiz Detective Bertrand asked ortiz is he was willing to go to the police station with him for an interview. Once both arrived to the police station Detective Bertrand and Salvador Sanchez, a Sioux City officer, acting as translator, handed Ortiz a Voluntary Waiver of Rights…

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Arizona Incomparable Case Study
    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Arizona Incomparable Case Study

    The criminal has the privilege to have a sensible safeguard set for the wrongdoing he or she perpetrated and as indicated by the genuine flight hazard which he or she may force. In 1963 a man known as Ernesto Arturo Miranda was captured of charges he actually admited nightfall of interrigation, and was sentenced, and sentenced 20-30 years. Miranda's court apointed lawyer contended taht he was not educated he has a privilege to insight, and his admission was not volontary. The Arizona Incomparable Court ruled upon this case, and announced that Miranda was unconscious of the rights allowed under the fifth amendent's self implication provision, and the sixth alterations right to a lawyer.…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Case Study Of The Supreme Court Case Of Miranda V. Arizona
    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Case Study Of The Supreme Court Case Of Miranda V. Arizona

    n.d.). After being sentenced Mr. Miranda appealed the court’s decision in the Supreme Court of Arizona and they held that his constitutional rights were not violated in obtaining the confession (uscourt.gov. com. n.d.). Although, the Supreme Court of Arizona voted that his rights were not violated Mr. Miranda was not satisfied with their decision and took his case to the…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Federal Government And The Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause
    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Federal Government And The Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause

    Once a state has created a law and it has been determined to be constitutional, the enforcement process lends itself to judicial scrutiny when brought before the court. When the process of enforcement and the discovery of evidence have been put into motion, the circumstance surrounding how law enforcement came into contact with the accused is one of the first things reviewed - much of the initial interaction is based on the enforcement of State laws, which cascades into protected rights when the enforcement effort starts, or elements of a crime have been discovered. Since the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the Bill of Rights applies the Federal Government, and the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process Clause makes the Bill of Rights applicable…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Fare V. Arizona 1979
    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Fare V. Arizona 1979

    In the case of Fare v. Michael C. (1979), the United States Supreme Court rejected the California Supreme Court’s position that a juvenile's request to see his probation officer constitutes an invocation of the right to remain silent within the context of Miranda v. Arizona (1966). Sixteen year old Michael C. was taken into custody by the Van Nuys, California police department on suspicion of murder. After being advised of his Maranda rights, and acknowledging he understood them, he was asked if he wanted an attorney. His response was, “Can I have my probation officer here?” (Page 442 U. S. 710).…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    2012 Dbq Analysis
    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages

    2012 Dbq Analysis

    In contrast, the government made more considerable efforts to reshape American democratic ideals. During this time, the government had the ability to enact changes as reactions to the objectives of other groups seeking to redefine these ideas, however, it often recognized the lack of social and economic equality for all groups and approached reform during this era broadly so that many minority groups became democratically equal to the majority. For example, many politicians recognized the need for new policies and thus directed their political agenda to conceiving and instituting such legislation. According to Robert F. Kennedy in his speech announcing his candidacy for the Democratic nomination for President, he recognized that the United…

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Supreme Court Dbq Analysis
    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Supreme Court Dbq Analysis

    Arizona (1966). This decision, generally speaking, defined the rights of the accused after an appeal was made on behalf of Ernesto Miranda. It said, among other things, that each person accused of a crime has the right to remain silent and the right to an attorney (Document 7). The tradition of these Miranda rights has become common knowledge in American society, despite the fact that some people believe that they are generally too lenient and often hamper the justice system’s ability to convict guilty criminals of their crimes (Documents 5a & 5b). The Supreme Court has failed to see adequate need for reversal of this decision, despite the dramatic odds that lie in favour of the accused as a result of the decision, and the fact that the victim is often left without help when the offender is not convicted.…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Miranda Rights Dbq Analysis
    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Miranda Rights Dbq Analysis

    The Miranda warning that arose from the U.S. Supreme Court's Miranda v. Arizona decision assures that officers assure that those arrested are aware of their rights that protect against self-incrimination prior to any questioning. The ruling in Miranda does fulfill the legal tradition of the promise against self-incrimination and protects against the pressures of authority. The Miranda rights fulfills the legal tradition of the promise against self-incrimination because they protect against wrongful punishment and torture employed by authorities. Authorities can abuse their power in order to gain info or prove their suspicions correct.…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Colorado Exoneration Argumentative Essay
    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Colorado Exoneration Argumentative Essay

    In the Supreme Court case, Nelson v. Colorado, the judgment revolves around the constitutionality of the Colorado Exoneration Act. This act stated that monetary fines paid due to conviction charges can only be returned to the exonerated individual if they can prove beyond a reasonable doubt that they are innocent of the accused crime. The constitutionality of this law was debated and in question in regards to the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution. I concur in the recent Supreme Court decision that the Colorado Exoneration Act should be ruled as unconstitutional. I am in assent with this recent decision that the current Colorado law is unconstitutional because it violates the Fourteenth Amendment, which protects United States citizen’s right to a fair trial, undermines the legitimacy and authority of a criminal court proceeding, and also contradicts the precedent established in various courts that…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    Robinson V. California Case Study
    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Robinson V. California Case Study

    The investigators found a written confession admitting the offense. However, the police officers who arrested Miranda did not advise him to have an attorney during the interrogation. Even though the court charged Miranda for the crimes, the appeal in the Supreme Court of Arizona found no violation of his constitutional rights since he failed to request counsel. The amendment in check was the Fifth Amendment. D. 419 U.S. 565 Goss v. Lopez Argued: October 16, 1974 Decided: January 22,…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Media Discrimination Of Police Brutality
    • 1995 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Media Discrimination Of Police Brutality

    This shows that police brutality can take place when they don’t have any proof that you committed a crime and could beat you until you gave a fake confession just to make the beating stop. A place that has be known for how its police uses force is Los Angeles, California. The LAPD has dealt with many complaints when it comes to its officers and how they conduct themselves out in the field. The Commission has found that “of approximately 1,800 officers against whom an allegation of excessive force or improper tactics was made from 1986 to 1990, more than 1,400 had only one or two allegations”. While one or two allegations may seem to be okay because they could just be accusations without any proof, “183 officers had 4 or more allegations, 44 had 6 or more allegations, 16 had 8 or more,…

    • 1995 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Fifth Amendment
    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Fifth Amendment

    Arizona, which ruled that the inculpatory and exculpatory evidence brought against a defendant at trial is only admissible if the defendant has been informed of his right against self-incrimination as well as his right to consult with an attorney. This Supreme Court decision was brought about by the conviction of Ernesto Miranda, who provided a confession to police without being informed of his right to counsel and his right to remain silent. The Arizona State Supreme Court upheld the conviction, but the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that because he had not been informed of his rights, his rights had not been properly upheld. The key to this decision is the distinction between an informed waiving of those rights, and an uninformed waiving of those rights. If a person is convicted based on self-incrimination, the prosecution must be able to prove that they were explicitly aware of and subsequently waived their rights.…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Judicial Summary: Miranda V. Arizona
    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Judicial Summary: Miranda V. Arizona

    Arizona can also be put into the frame of judicial activism. The Supreme Court created a new law, bypassing the elected legislative branch of government, in order to protect the rights of the accused. The law that requires police to read the defendant the “Miranda Rights” not only helps to protect the defendant from self-incrimination under duress, but it also reduces police violence and other forms of intimidation that could lead to a false confession. The new law protects the rights of the accused and changes the behavior of the police towards arrests and interrogations, reconciling growing police powers with individual basic…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Persuasive Speech About Police Brutality
    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Persuasive Speech About Police Brutality

    This past few decades we have encountered several police cases dripping with police brutality. I believe that sometimes police chiefs and people in authority over these men and women try to induce us into…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    The People Vs. Larry Flynt Analysis
    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The People Vs. Larry Flynt Analysis

    The People vs. Larry Flynt Americans value their freedom, most especially their freedom of speech and how their Constitution protects such freedom. Speeches like hate speech, speech plus, symbolic speech, seditious speech and the like are part of their freedom of speech. For the purposes of this paper, the film to be discussed is The People vs. Larry Flynt. This paper will also discuss the interrelationship between media, identities, and politics depicted in the said movie. Brief Summary of the Film…

    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings