Police Should Wear Body Cameras
Being in law enforcement isn 't a easy job. The goal of a police officer is to protect and serve the civilians. Lately, police brutality has been a hot topic of discussion due to some police officers taking their power to extreme measures when dealing with the public. Many unarmed minorities were being killed at the hands of officers all over the United States. According to the website www.mappingpoliceviolence.org, "37% of unarmed minorities were killed by police in 2015 and on 10 out of the 102 cases, the police were actually charged with the crime" (Mapping Violence, 2015). This raised a red flag in the eye of the public and they started asking questions and demanding answers. To solve this issue, police officers should be required to wear body cameras on duty when interacting with the public because it will show the behaviors of the police officers, collect any evidence that is needed to solve a case and it will protect the public against police brutality. Body worn cameras should be considered while on duty when interacting with the public because it will show the behaviors of both parties. Tony Farrar study is a perfect example. He is the chief of the police department …show more content…
What happens if a police come across a case dealing with domestic violence or a rape victim? Will that have to be on video? Also how will they handle situations like this? To start off police should definitely wear the cameras at all time while on duty no matter the situation. But when it is time to present the evidence, it should be giving in right away. The police officers should then be presented with a new tape to go out on duty. Another concern people have with the cameras is that witnesses that can testify to a crime may not want to because they fear if they testify against the person, retaliation will occur. This will make a lot of unsolved
Being in law enforcement isn 't a easy job. The goal of a police officer is to protect and serve the civilians. Lately, police brutality has been a hot topic of discussion due to some police officers taking their power to extreme measures when dealing with the public. Many unarmed minorities were being killed at the hands of officers all over the United States. According to the website www.mappingpoliceviolence.org, "37% of unarmed minorities were killed by police in 2015 and on 10 out of the 102 cases, the police were actually charged with the crime" (Mapping Violence, 2015). This raised a red flag in the eye of the public and they started asking questions and demanding answers. To solve this issue, police officers should be required to wear body cameras on duty when interacting with the public because it will show the behaviors of the police officers, collect any evidence that is needed to solve a case and it will protect the public against police brutality. Body worn cameras should be considered while on duty when interacting with the public because it will show the behaviors of both parties. Tony Farrar study is a perfect example. He is the chief of the police department …show more content…
What happens if a police come across a case dealing with domestic violence or a rape victim? Will that have to be on video? Also how will they handle situations like this? To start off police should definitely wear the cameras at all time while on duty no matter the situation. But when it is time to present the evidence, it should be giving in right away. The police officers should then be presented with a new tape to go out on duty. Another concern people have with the cameras is that witnesses that can testify to a crime may not want to because they fear if they testify against the person, retaliation will occur. This will make a lot of unsolved