This article goes farther in depth into the topic of police brutality and if it is a prevalent factor in society today. People defending the police expressed that officers rarely use excessive force unless it is, in their opinion, absolutely necessary or they fear their life is being threatened. They also expressed that over the last two decades crime has gradually declined thanks to assertive policing. Supporters say that many accusations of police brutality are fabricated or over exaggerated and people are ignorant to the dangers officers face every day. Opponents express that the police often injure people they suspect of crimes and occasionally end up killing the people they pursue. Police departments often cover up stories of abuse and
…show more content…
It was not biased because it showed both sides equally. It was very current in the things it was saying because this article was issued February 10, 2016. It included reliable information and charts. The information presented was very easy to understand and interpret for the reason that it put in a well-documented way. This source was incredibly helpful for my paper. It offered new understanding on my topic and helped me shape my argument a little better. It explained both parties in police brutality and showed me where everyone is coming from. I plan to use the information found in this article to help with forming my thesis. I plan to use the credible information to farther support my argument and provide a little insight on this growing debate.
Pro argument – police brutality: Allegations of police brutality are often overblown and ignorant to the fact that police officers face many perils and often have to make hasty decisions in a spilt second to protect everyone in the situation. (“Police” 8)
Con argument – police brutality: People feel as if the police use unnecessary excessive force when dealing with the public, especially minorities. They feel as if the reported incidence are a miniscule sample of the authentic amount of misconduct that actually occurs. (“Police
It was not biased because it showed both sides equally. It was very current in the things it was saying because this article was issued February 10, 2016. It included reliable information and charts. The information presented was very easy to understand and interpret for the reason that it put in a well-documented way. This source was incredibly helpful for my paper. It offered new understanding on my topic and helped me shape my argument a little better. It explained both parties in police brutality and showed me where everyone is coming from. I plan to use the information found in this article to help with forming my thesis. I plan to use the credible information to farther support my argument and provide a little insight on this growing debate.
Pro argument – police brutality: Allegations of police brutality are often overblown and ignorant to the fact that police officers face many perils and often have to make hasty decisions in a spilt second to protect everyone in the situation. (“Police” 8)
Con argument – police brutality: People feel as if the police use unnecessary excessive force when dealing with the public, especially minorities. They feel as if the reported incidence are a miniscule sample of the authentic amount of misconduct that actually occurs. (“Police