Pluralism Elitism And Hyperpluralism

Decent Essays
1) In Ch. 1 three major theories that have been introduced: Pluralism, Elitism and Hyperpluralism. Pluralism is the major concept that average citizens consider democracy. The ability to participate in conferment. Within Pluralism individuals can ban together with issues and push them through the necessary government actions. Since the interests of Americans are diver, many interest groups form. In Hyperpluralism has the same format as pluralism except the interest groups have become crippling to the successful function of government. A somewhat recent example of this would be the government shutdown. Elitism is the concept that the top money makers control the direction of this nation. The members guilty for the government shutdown can

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Identifying the reasons why the United States of America’s founding framers established the unique governmental framework is just as important as recognizing them. In a time when the framers were actively trying to quell individual political ambitions and prevent the reintroduction of a tyranny, they turned to the separation of power and checks and balances. The idea was to separate powers across the political spectrum, which would then prevent any one branch from amassing a concentration of power. Also, each branch is granted the power to check any action taken by its cohorts. Furthermore, the fact that the U.S. Constitution was the first written document of its kind only emphasizes the circumstances that the framers could not have drawn from past documents success or failures.…

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Federalist No. 10 Analysis

    • 1424 Words
    • 6 Pages

    When James Madison outlines the dangers of faction in Federalist No. 10, he defines faction as “a number of citizens, whether amounting to a majority or minority of the whole, who are united...by some common...interest, adverse to the rights of other citizens.” 1 This wording is critical for examining both the goals and pivotal ideas of the federalist movement. At first glance, this definition seems to reflect the very real fear of mob uprising. Certainly, it’s tone insinuates an image of mob citizenry diametrically opposed to a smaller elite. However, although this image may have captured this political component of the United States in November 1787, a closer inspection yields a less controversial interpretation.…

    • 1424 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Paper #3 – Critical Evaluation of Hudson’s Challenges to American Democracy In the textbook, American Democracy in Peril, William E. Hudson has written a well-thought out critique of the challenges faced by American democracy, but some of his methods and reasonings have issues. Hudson is looking for anything that he thinks might work in the American democracy. This paper will critically evaluate Hudson’s work and a few specific flaws in his proposals. Hudson is striving to make a difference, but he has not conscientiously considered the feasibility of his plans.…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Electoral College Faulty

    • 1346 Words
    • 5 Pages

    What would have happened if four presidents that have long since been entered into the history books had not been the ones elected? In 1876, 1888, 1960, and 2000, the popular vote and the Electoral College did not elect the same candidate. However, the Electoral College had the final decision.…

    • 1346 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A simple fact of nature for humans is their desire to compete and win, the true can be said for minority and majority groups. James Madison foresaw this problem when writing Federalist 10. He discusses the problems with factions and their threat they posed to the new government, as well as the naturally ambitious nature of humans and how that can be used to control power. Lastly, Madison claims that pluralism and the ambition of people are the solution to factions. The Madisonian majority is the idea of small factions, groups of either minority or majority looking to bend public interests in their favor.…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the first chapter of William E. Hudson’s book American Democracy in Peril, Hudson discusses the reasoning and application of the separation of powers stemmed from the Constitution, and the impact it has had as well as the failures that came as a consequence of it. Due to the changing meaning of the Jeffersonian model, one of the failures Hudson argues is that the separation of powers in a partisan, party-based system falls apart once both parties are to blame. It is also argued that the same system creates a political minority “biased against change” to protect against the supposed tyranny of the majority. Hudson ends by making a case in favor of a change in government towards the form of a parliament for the sake of accountability and protection…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Introduction: The United States of America is a country that has strived for a government that is by the people and for the people from day one. As a result of this desire for unbiased representation of citizen’s demands, the Legislative branch of government was formed. The Legislative branch is a “Bicameral Legislature consisting of Senate and House of Representatives. ”(p53) While these two chambers serve a different constituency, the members of both House and Senate are elected directly by the people.…

    • 1385 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Based on Aristotle’s definitions of Oligarchy and Democracy, can America be considered a true democracy? Aristotle points out several forms of government throughout his “Democracy and Oligarchy”. In this work, Aristotle focuses primarily on democracy and oligarchy and makes a strong effort through the use of definitions to distinguish between the many instances these two forms of government are able to exist in and the differences between the them. Using Aristotle’s definitions, let us diagnose America and see if she can rightfully claim democracy, first by explaining what the two types of government consist of and then by picking through a few characteristics of America. “Democracy is the form of government in which the free are rulers”…

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Vega 1 Breanna Vega Professor Olmos English 101 23 April 2016 Citizens Rule Democracy is known to be a strong form of government, because it gives full power to the people of the nation. Many argue about how a democracy works, but do not understand it includes difficult tasks for it to be successful. In Cornel West’s reading, “The Deep Democratic Tradition in America,” the idea of a strong democracy is by the people, but the promise of a democracy has failed. In order to keep the promise of strong democracy individual practices such as voting rights, the principle of protection, and the representation of each individual must be practiced under no circumstances.…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In today’s modern democracy, political parties and interest groups play a huge projecting role in the United States government and it is rising quickly. Political parties and interest groups are organized groups of people who work towards specific goals within the government, promoting politicians and raising money to help accomplish certain needs. While yes, both groups are working towards similar goals they often times serve different purposes within the country’s political system. The real question is whether or not either of these groups are helping improve America or if they are helping to diminish the American political system. The most familiar group known amongst people around the country is the idea of political parties.…

    • 1078 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Thinking About Political Reform by John R. Johannes is about making the American government operate smoother for the people and politics. Political reformers are faced with these challenging issues. They must think about what reforms are great for politics and if they will work out for the people. In the book Thinking About Political Reform Johannes discuss what reform is and list numerous reforms that can benefit American government. This essay is intended to break down each chapter of Thinking About Political Reform so the reader can understand the methods of the book and understand the framework of Thinking About Political Reform.…

    • 1402 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    At the very basic level, a democratic structure can be defined as an ‘institutional arrangement for arriving at political decisions in which individuals acquire the power to decide by means of a competitive struggle for the people’s vote’ (Schumpeter 1942 cited in Menocal 2007). The positive relationship between prosperity and democracy has an enduring relationship in the subject of social sciences. Although there does exist a strong correlation, it does not necessarily mean causation.…

    • 1947 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Democracy favors smaller organizational entities, such as the state or the town hall meeting. It is very difficult to deliberate among 6 billion people, and one need only look at the UN to realize that the larger an area an organization encompasses, the less democratic it tends to be. With so many distinct cultures on this earth, it would be a shame to lump them all together and subject them to the will of the majority whose moral outlook they do not share. The continued existence of the celebrated diversity of this planet and the democratic ideals they hold dear depends largely on the existence of a plurality of…

    • 1504 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Direct Democracy

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages

    " Elite theory is a perspective that society is ruled by a small number of people who hold the ultimate power to further their self-interest. This theory would have the more "elite" or wealthier class make the important decisions. Pluralism is another type of democracy that is known as the "democracy for groups. " Pluralism is a theory that views politics as a conflict among interest groups and political decisions are characterized by compromise and accommodation. All three theories are used to describe how citizens actually see…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Along with the idea of a collective goal, there are no divisions between specific social classes. Conversely to Democracy, only one class is present in which all citizens are a part…

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays