Plea Bargaining In Court Cases

Improved Essays
The concept of plea bargaining leaves questions for its relevancy in a court case such as in Paul Hayes’s sentence. A settlement gives way for abstention to forgo their constitutional rights to manage a decreased prison sentence. Each payment occurs to stimulate a defendant in evading a trail by a formal or informal agreement with the prosecutor. This right to make a contract is to be followed by way of a guilty plea or nolo contendere plea. Nonetheless, the, “constitutional defect with plea bargaining is systemic, not episodic. The rarity of jury trials is not the result of some spontaneous order spawned by contract negotiations between individuals” (p. 27).
Its leniency still downgrades a right to a formal trial that is supposed to be guaranteed

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Plea-bargaining is an important process in the criminal justice system and are used to prevent lengthy trials. It is defined as “the process of negotiating a guilty plea involving either charge bargaining, where the prosecutor will offer to reduce the severity of the charges or the number of counts in exchange for a guilty plea, or sentence bargaining, where the prosecutor will agree to recommend leniency at the sentencing stage” (Hemmens, Brody, & Spohn, 2013). However, there are both pros and cons with plea-bargaining. One reason why plea-bargaining is an advantage to the court system is because it helps to relieve caseloads since the prosecutor’s workload decreases when a defendant takes the bargain. Also, when a defendant goes this route,…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    However, the jury is not a democracy. The jury reaches a verdict based only on evidence provided to them during the trial. Additionally, the trial aggravated a vast misunderstanding of the defense counsel’s role, a problem present before the case.…

    • 1614 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The use of coercion in plea bargains is constitutional according to the Supreme Court. Since plea-bargains for drug courts involve a greater need of coercion than normal court process due to the limited options available, it is considered a leveraging power to help drug users take advantage of the necessary treatment provided. However, the excessive use of coercion has led to many drug offenders entering treatment that are considered understaffed and over capacity (Parsons & Wei, 2015). The excessive use of coercion has also forced a drug courts to choice in behalf of the defendant, since the alternative is facing a jail sentence. Despite the concerns addressed, the courts when challenged of this claim find under the drug court setting that…

    • 1032 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jury System Dbq Analysis

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Over the years, jury systems have precedent the way we reach a verdict based on the trial. Moreover, it has been proven that jury systems have shaped Americans to be self-governors (Document B). Evidence shows that in a twelve month period bench trials have only 65 percent of criminals that have been convicted and 87 percent of criminals have been convicted in jury trials (Document A). This proves that jury systems are able to prosecute more and deliver more justice than bench trials. To begin, I support jury systems based on open minded peers reaching a verdict, prevention of corruption, and civic participation/knowledge for citizens.…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Balancing the tension between community interest and individual rights and freedoms are a significant component of the criminal trial process and is relatively successful in that retrospect. In order to be effective and efficient the criminal trial process should reflect the moral and ethical standards of society, ensure the community is sufficiently protected and respects the rights of the individual. However, despite efforts to achieve justice for all members of society, the criminal trial process does fail to provide adequate success in some areas of the law such as the jury system, Legal Aid and the provocation defence. All these areas to an extent highlight the lack of success the criminal trial process serves in balancing community interests…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plea Bargaining Advantages

    • 1021 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Plea bargaining is an agreement made between the prosecution and the defense that allows the defendant to receive a lesser charge for their crimes if they plead guilty. The prosecution often offers the defendant a reduced sentence. Most of the time, “the defendant agrees to plead guilty in order to avoid a trial and a more severe sentence” (Rennison and Dodge 204). When the defendant agrees to a plea bargain they agree to give up some of their constitutional rights including, the right to a jury and the right to appeal their case. In the American legal system, plea bargaining is very popular and is used to resolve around 90% of criminal cases (Plea Bargains: In Depth).…

    • 1021 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Being in law enforcement for several years I come across several suspects and defendants who expresses the criminal justice process moves like a snail and is always unpredictable. Imagine if a significant amount of cases was going to trial instead of over 90% of felony cases are plea bargained (Bohm, R., Haley, K.,n.d). Nevertheless, there are three types of plea bargains and prosecutors tend to have factors to decide if the plea bargain is in the best interest or what’s the better plea bargain to make depending on the situation. The first example, a defendant might plead guilty to trespass and a misdemeanor vandalism charge instead of burglary charge because burglary carries felony charges.…

    • 344 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plea bargaining in the criminal justice system is a controversial practice. There are people who believe plea bargaining is an injustice towards both the innocent and the victims. There are people who believe plea bargaining is morally acceptable. No matter how many people believe it is a defect in the criminal justice system, plea bargaining will always exist. Plea bargaining is a negotiation in which the defendant agrees to enter a plea of guilty to a lesser charge and the prosecutor agrees to drop a more serious charge.…

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many Americans are afraid to challenge an imperfect criminal justice system responsible for allowing thousands of innocent people pleading guilty each year. The 6th Amendment allows “the accused the rights to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury” in all criminal prosecutions. However, most cases never reach to a trial because the plea bargain guarantees the accuser to take a shorter sentence. Prosecutors take advantage of the criminal justice system by using mandatory minimums and past criminal records as leverage for the defendant to plead guilty, even if the accuser claims to be innocent. It is unethical to imbue prosecutors with so much unilateral power.…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Plea Bargaining is a type of negotiation in which a defendant and prosecutor, to plea guilty and in return the guilty when get a reduction or dismissal of charges. My three arguments, in favor of the plea bargaining are, first it helps keep non dangerous criminals out of prison. This way there are more spaces to keep the real dangerous criminals behind bars. For example, if a male steals food from a liquor store, he should be given community services, pay a fine or locked up for at a month, instead of 5 years. Second, it is a requires less cost and time to the prosecutor.…

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Consolidated draft Policy decisions that we seek to undertake, in most occasions, are in conformity with the aims and goals of its implementation. However, that being said, there are several tangential inroads which are made to facilitate convenience and a breed of compromise so as to achieve the realistic aims of public policy. While I agree, that in the criminal administrative system, bridging the gap between what is aimed at and what can be done in a modern day society paradigm, seems to be the biggest challenge and therefore certain alternatives to the conventional means of law enforcement are mandated. That being acceded to, this paper seeks to analyze one such method, which is Plea bargaining and how its implementation seems to not serve…

    • 1487 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Parol Evidence Rule

    • 1413 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Wiencek further argues that the trial court erred by considering “parol evidence to vary the effective date of the [B108 agreement] and to controvert the integration clause.” CHH, for its part, avers that the admission of parol evidence was proper because it was offered to determine whether the contract was effective. We hold that the circuit court did not violate the parole evidence rule because extrinsic evidence was not offered to add or modify any terms to the B108 agreement. Generally, parol or extrinsic evidence is inadmissible to vary the terms of an integrated contract.…

    • 1413 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    A plea bargain is a procedure that prosecutors use to avoid a trial as juries or even judges can be unpredictable in their behavior and may rule against them. Prosecutors like sure things as does the State and a plea bargain gains an admission of guilt without the right to an appeal in exchange for leniency. However, a plea bargain may induce prosecutors to over-charge a suspect in an attempt to bully them into gaining a plea bargain. Plea bargains are also not conducted in open court so there is a lack of transparency that occurs (Carp, Stidham, Manning, & Holmes, 2017, p. 226). Judicial Restraint is a stricter interpretation of the law based upon its constitutional merits, legislative merits or legal precedent.…

    • 1189 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Bargaining Case Summary

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The textbook states that a bargaining unit should consist of employees that “share a community of interest regarding working conditions” (Cihon & Castagnera, 2014, p. 400) and that it can’t include professional and non-professional employees (Cihon & Castagnera, 2014, p. 401) which might be the case here because there are technical workers whose roles could be considered professiona . I’m going to assume that the clerical and technical employees share the same common interests on working conditions as the production employees and that the technical employees are not considered professional roles. Otherwise, I don’t think they can join that union (unless I misunderstood the textbook). In that case, the demand can be disregarded. Going on the assumption they can join that union, considering the employer received feedback from employees that they didn’t want to join it, I would proceed with an election via secret ballot.…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I have observed a few cases in the adult plea court, and while some cases were quick and short, only one was long. Even though there were various of cases that were dealing with different types of crimes, I saw that the legal system was still fair with their decisions towards the accused. A small case that occurred was R v. Stanley and the type of case was assault which is under section 265.1(a) in the criminal code. The name of the accused was Alloq Stanley, the crown 's name was Mr. Humphrey who was also the crown for the rest of the cases, and Judge Kehoe was present in this case and the rest as well. The facts are that the victim, Stubbins went to bed and there were physical altercations between them while Alloq was intoxicated and fears…

    • 1294 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays