Plea Bargaining Case Study

Improved Essays
An innocent man was released from jail after thirty years...X celebrity has received a lighter sentence after pleading guilty...These are things heard often on the news, in movies, on the radio. Evidently, plea bargaining is a part of everyday culture. But should it be? The practice of plea-bargaining incarcerates innocent citizens, encourages repetition of crimes, and motivates people into committing misdeeds.
Plea-bargaining allows criminals to avoid proper retributive justice for their actions. For example, Jared Fogle, a spokesman for Subway, was convicted of child pornography and molestation in August 2015. However, after arguing for a plea deal, his previously set sentence may be dramatically reduced to 13 years, with a possible reduction of five additional years. This would guarantee that Fogle would not have spent sufficient time in prison - usually about 20 years - for punishment and penitence (Castillo). Like Fogle, many others who commit less violent felonies and misdemeanors argue for a plea bargain in order to avoid facing
…show more content…
A bar shooting in Florida, for instance, could have easily been prevented had plea bargaining not been utilized in the shooter’s case previously. 19-year-old Jamee Husband had been convicted of armed robbery once in his teens, but because he pled guilty, he was let off after a short stint in jail. He was even allowed to purchase a gun after this incident (Doudrick). By receiving a shorter punishment, Husband was not deterred from repeating the crime because of the lack of severe consequences. Another situation that emulates the “less punishment, more repetition of crime” is child abuse. Sometimes, parents who confessed to child abuse were able to maintain custody over them, only to continue physically and mentally harming the child (Belz). If a proper trial without shortcuts occurred, the frequency of repeated abuse would diminish greatly, if not be completely

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Review: In 1975, Attorney General, Avrum Gross, declared a prohibition on plea-bargaining in Alaska. Michael Rubinstein and Teresa J. White from National Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice were assigned to study the impact of Gross’s decision. Their first task was looking at whether the policy had been carried out by the courts in Alaska, and second, was what the effects were on Alaska’s criminal justice system. This involved conducting 400 interviews of the surrounding judges in Alaska and collecting information from 3,586 case files. Overall their goal was to create a detailed description of the Alaska system during the “before and after” years.…

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Plea Bargain Advantages

    • 2557 Words
    • 11 Pages

    A plea bargain is when the defendant in a criminal trial agrees to plead guilty in the exchange of a lesser sentence or to have other charges dropped. In theory, a plea bargain is a way to speed up the courtroom process. When applied correctly plea bargains are excellent tools within the criminal justice system. Incorrectly used judgment is cast down from those outside of the criminal justice system.…

    • 2557 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the United States, the use of mandatory minimums became commonplace with support from both sides of the political spectrum. With public support for tough laws, these sentencing minimums were enacted across the country due to increasing crime rates. However, in certain states, lawmakers and taxpayers are beginning to see that these laws cost more than they help. In Tallahassee, Florida, a twenty-five-year drug sentence for selling thirty-five pills for $300 will cost taxpayers an average of $18,064 per year, or $451,600 by the time the offender is released (Klas, 2017). Others will argue that mandatory minimums increase sentencing disparity because these do not follow federal sentencing guidelines.…

    • 1206 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Around 95 percent of cases are plea bargained. Without plea bargaining, the court system would be drowning in cases and the right to a speedy trial under the 6th amendment would be virtually impossible. The court system in the United States is already overloaded with cases waiting to be heard, and the added cases resulting in the elimination of plea bargaining would be catastrophic for the criminal justice system. What plea bargaining does is allow the prosecutor to offer a lesser charge and, in turn, the defendant waives their right to a trial. It allows the court system to move along faster and deal with the offenders who commit more serious, heinous crimes.…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The judge has the power to accept or deny the plea deal, and part of this process is to deny sentences that stray too far from the Sentencing Guidelines. Kosman writes that it is even encouraged for the prosecutor, defendant, and judge to agree to a plea sentence “explicitly calculated according to guidelines” (Kosman 806). Federal district courts that have denied these motions for sentence modifications, and federal circuit appellate courts that have upheld such rulings based on assumptions of the plea sentence and the per se rule have clearly demonstrated the overall trouble plea bargains have caused defendants. While plea bargains have clearly not been the best deal for defendants who are often first-time offenders, such a high rate of cases ending in plea bargains demonstrates the ubiquity and power of the practice in the American criminal system. This facet, combined with the disparity in crack cocaine sentencing has produced even more unjust outcomes for defendants who were offered sentence reductions by the Sentencing Commission, and reflects the harsh reality of plea bargains in the American criminal…

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plea bargaining brings to light the unreciprocated power that the prosecutor has due to the nature of the criminal justice system in America. Plea Deals Demonstrate Prosecutorial Power…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to the Innocence Project Organization more than 20,000 innocent people are currently serving time in prison. The Billy Glaze and Andre Hatchett cases are two of thousands in which one can lead one to see the faults in the United States court system. By analyzing the case details, what happened during the investigation, and what stood out during the trial and investigation of both cases, one can conclude that our criminal justice system truly is flawed. Billy Glaze is a man who even lost his life in prison. Andre Hatchett was able to be freed but not until he already served 25 years in prison.…

    • 1383 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plea Bargaining Process

    • 212 Words
    • 1 Pages

    The numerical evidence for plea bargaining in the juvenile…

    • 212 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plea Bargaining Process

    • 1131 Words
    • 5 Pages

    What is the role of the prosecutor in the plea bargaining process? The role of the prosecutor in a Plea-bargaining process is to get the defendant to come to an agreement to where the defendant pleads guilty to some or many of the charges filed against them therefore bypassing a costly trial preceding. The prosecutor usually offers a reduced punishment if the defendants agrees to their terms. In some jurisdictions prosecutors and the defendant can work with the judges to help them determine what the sentence they will get if they accept the plea bargain. As prosecutor, what would you recommend in an attempt to resolve the case and why?…

    • 1131 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Abolishing the Plea Bargaining System 97 percent of federal cases and 94 percent of state cases end in plea bargains, with defendants pleading guilty in exchange for a lesser sentence (Goode, 2012). A plea bargain is an arrangement that happens between a prosecutor and the defendant in a criminal case. The prosecutor gives the defendant the opportunity to plead guilty to their charge or a lesser charge in order to avoid trial and the possibility of receiving the maximum sentence. While it would seem that plea bargains are equally beneficial to both prosecutors and defendants, plea bargains are overwhelmingly beneficial to the prosecutor and it is the defendant who ultimately can be harmed by plea bargaining. Plea bargaining should be banned because it bargaining circumvents the Constitutional rights for defendants, leads to shortcuts in the judicial system and can lead to increased convictions of the innocent.…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ray Rice Research Paper

    • 391 Words
    • 2 Pages

    “As a society, it seems we have simply come to expect that rich and famous individuals will always find ways to get off easier in matters of crime and punishment (Weinberger 1). The latest case to prove the legal system's celebrity favoritism (Weinberger 1)? Most will quickly point to former Baltimore Ravens player Ray Rice's lenient treatment in the aftermath of a vicious domestic assault on his fiancée in an Atlantic City, New Jersey casino (Weinberger 1). Despite video evidence which clearly shows Rice punching the victim with such force that she was knocked unconscious, criminal prosecutors in New Jersey allowed the NFL player to enter a pretrial intervention program (PTI) that will spare him jail time, probation and even a criminal record…

    • 391 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The advent of plea bargaining in the legal system in the past century has rendered the classic "trial" virtually obsolete. Plea bargaining1 is a crucial feature of our criminal justice system, as approximately 95% of convictions that occur within a year of arrest are obtained by a guilty plea. For at least a century, the institution of plea bargaining' has been a central feature of the American system of criminal justice. In September 203, the Justice Department again revised its guidelines regarding plea bargains. Lawyers and non-lawyers alike have generally assumed that the reason for this is the enormous size of the case load in relation to the available legal personnel.…

    • 1547 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In a criminal justice system defined by the maxim “innocent until proven guilty,” it’s both humiliating and laughably ironic that over 97% of cases that make it to court are still prematurely abridged (Walsh). In these, defendants are never aided by an attorney, tried in front of a jury, or even sentenced by a judge. Rather, these cases end with a plea bargain: an agreement struck between a defendant and a prosecutor that trades an admission of guilt in exchange for a lighter sentence. In stark contrast with the original, constitutional ideals of due process, plea bargaining has attracted both vocal critics and stanch sponsors; the former alleging that it’s violates the integrity of our judicial system, and the latter defending it as a component without which our entire system would collapse.…

    • 1439 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The downsides of the plea bargaining, will give the accuser less sentences they deserves for the crime they have…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plea Bargaining

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages

    PLEA BARGAINING’S LACK OF FORMAL PROCESS Additionally, plea negotiations lack a formal process, where unrestricted prosecutorial discretion coupled with minimal judicial oversight gives rise to inconsistent sentencing and a non-transparent system. In the current system, prosecutors have almost unlimited discretion which can lead to overcharging, where the accused may face “duplicate charges for single acts or crimes charged at higher degrees than the evidence can reasonably support” (Work, 2014, p. 462), creating cases that are easier to leverage into guilty pleas. This is possible because using their discretion, prosecutors can change "charges and fact allegations” (Sherrin, 2011, p. 17) without any accountability.…

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics