Plea Bargaining Case Study

Decent Essays
Using plea bargaining as a tool to expedite justice is not the most effective manner to handle such situation. After reading each case, I believe that pressuring the defendant only leads to the use of plea bargaining. A more thorough Investigation is to be done to determine the defendant’s culpability. Defendants are being pressured by their court-appoint lawyers. In the case of Erma Stewart, who situation left her pleading guilty for an offense not committed for a faster release. Still unable to pay debts, no government help and striving to survive. People in this position are being told that if they do not confess it will take them longer to be released or may never be released at all. Gampero was put in this position where he was told by

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Defense counsels started to feel that defendants will not be able to pay for the time involved to go to trial, but the prosecutors feel even though they work harder at a trial they are not having to decide on a sentence in a plea bargain. The judges now have the burden to determine and announce all sentences to defendants. The ban on plea bargaining did not affect the sentences of violent crime charges, but it did drastically change the sentences of Felony 3 guilty outcomes. The defendants convicted of burglary, larceny and destruction of property found themselves receiving longer sentences.…

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Unit 10 DB 1 Lawyer and Lawyer v. City of Council Bluffs, Iowa The case of Timothy LAWYER and Michael Lawyer, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF COUNCIL BLUFFS, IOWA was very interesting. Once this learner reviewed the video she understood the law, but also understood the Lawyers fear as well. This case went from bad to worst in the worst way. Lawyer and Lawyer Lawyer and Lawyer, two brothers about 17 and age 23 were pulled over for a traffic stop in regards to speeding on the 26th of March, 1999, at about 2am.…

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plea-bargaining is an important process in the criminal justice system and are used to prevent lengthy trials. It is defined as “the process of negotiating a guilty plea involving either charge bargaining, where the prosecutor will offer to reduce the severity of the charges or the number of counts in exchange for a guilty plea, or sentence bargaining, where the prosecutor will agree to recommend leniency at the sentencing stage” (Hemmens, Brody, & Spohn, 2013). However, there are both pros and cons with plea-bargaining. One reason why plea-bargaining is an advantage to the court system is because it helps to relieve caseloads since the prosecutor’s workload decreases when a defendant takes the bargain. Also, when a defendant goes this route,…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The individuals falsely accused in the article may have been victims of the Assembly-Line Justice Court Model. It is discussed that this type of court is unfair with little concern for efficiency or processes. This model also suggests that plea bargains are frequent because parties wish to make a quick decision. Milton Lantigua was offered a plea bargain but denied it because of his innocence. He was then sentenced to 20 years in prison for a crime he did not commit.…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In this research paper, an overview of what plea bargaining is, its incentives, and its disadvantages will be discussed in order to show that the disadvantages outweigh the advantages, as well as…

    • 1441 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plea bargaining most often takes place before the beginning of a trial. It is the process by which the defendant and the prosecution work out a conclusion to the case, subject to court approval. For the prosecutor, the purpose of plea bargaining is to ensure a defendant gets punishment. For the defense, it is a way to get a lesser charge than if the case were to go to…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Plea Bargain Advantages

    • 2557 Words
    • 11 Pages

    When a defendant agrees to plead guilty the time spent on what would have been their trial can now be devoted to another defendant. When a defendant takes advantage of a plea deal, they are often granted leniency on their punishment compared to what they might have received if the case went to trial. An advantage for the prosecutor is not gambling the case in court and risk the case being dismissed, or the defendant found not guilty. Another benefit that plea bargains offer is saving the victim from testifying in court. Psychologically, testifying in court could be very traumatizing to the…

    • 2557 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Based on the aforementioned statements in this week’s assignment, I agree with the second statement regarding plea bargaining being right and proper. Like any tool utilized to find a solution, or to compromise, plea bargaining can be abused. A majority of the time I feel that plea bargaining is a great tool that allows for a reduction in the number of trails that judges oversee (Plea Bargaining, 2009). Moreover, I believe that our justice system is flooded and congested with pending trials and lacks the resources needed to pursue each trial with an equal amount of attention (Plea Bargain, 2009).…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The use of coercion in plea bargains is constitutional according to the Supreme Court. Since plea-bargains for drug courts involve a greater need of coercion than normal court process due to the limited options available, it is considered a leveraging power to help drug users take advantage of the necessary treatment provided. However, the excessive use of coercion has led to many drug offenders entering treatment that are considered understaffed and over capacity (Parsons & Wei, 2015). The excessive use of coercion has also forced a drug courts to choice in behalf of the defendant, since the alternative is facing a jail sentence. Despite the concerns addressed, the courts when challenged of this claim find under the drug court setting that…

    • 1032 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ive learned there is a simple answer to this. They fear more time. When a defendant confesses to a crime in order to accept a deal from the prosecutor, the justice system believes that they are admitting to is the truth and have no reason to believe it’s a lie. As a result, the defendant will most likely waive their right to appeal the sentence and their deal. If the defendant does want to appeal a guilty plea, most likely the judge and the jury are asking them sleeves, “if he didn’t do it, then why did he admit to it”.…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The judge has the power to accept or deny the plea deal, and part of this process is to deny sentences that stray too far from the Sentencing Guidelines. Kosman writes that it is even encouraged for the prosecutor, defendant, and judge to agree to a plea sentence “explicitly calculated according to guidelines” (Kosman 806). Federal district courts that have denied these motions for sentence modifications, and federal circuit appellate courts that have upheld such rulings based on assumptions of the plea sentence and the per se rule have clearly demonstrated the overall trouble plea bargains have caused defendants. While plea bargains have clearly not been the best deal for defendants who are often first-time offenders, such a high rate of cases ending in plea bargains demonstrates the ubiquity and power of the practice in the American criminal system. This facet, combined with the disparity in crack cocaine sentencing has produced even more unjust outcomes for defendants who were offered sentence reductions by the Sentencing Commission, and reflects the harsh reality of plea bargains in the American criminal…

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    These cases show that confessions are not always prompted by internal knowledge or actual guilt, but are sometimes motivated by external influences. If they argue the money = innocence standpoint, use “bad lawyering” instead. The resources of the justice system are often stacked against poor defendants. Matters only become worse when a person is represented by an ineffective, incompetent or overburdened defense lawyer.…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Abolishing the Plea Bargaining System 97 percent of federal cases and 94 percent of state cases end in plea bargains, with defendants pleading guilty in exchange for a lesser sentence (Goode, 2012). A plea bargain is an arrangement that happens between a prosecutor and the defendant in a criminal case. The prosecutor gives the defendant the opportunity to plead guilty to their charge or a lesser charge in order to avoid trial and the possibility of receiving the maximum sentence. While it would seem that plea bargains are equally beneficial to both prosecutors and defendants, plea bargains are overwhelmingly beneficial to the prosecutor and it is the defendant who ultimately can be harmed by plea bargaining. Plea bargaining should be banned because it bargaining circumvents the Constitutional rights for defendants, leads to shortcuts in the judicial system and can lead to increased convictions of the innocent.…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Supreme Court’s early decisions on plea bargaining approve plea bargains as involving not just a stationhouse confession but as “more than a confession which admits that the accused did various acts” (Garrett 4). To be sure, plea bargains are justified on many other important grounds, particularly because they are efficient, they avoid uncertainties of outcomes at trial, and they permit choice, compromise, and flexibility. The many critics of plea bargaining point out how even the innocent may plead guilty to avoid higher penalties at a trial, with the resulting process empowering the prosecutor and largely eliminating judicial oversight. Plea bargains are not confessions, but part of their power and seeming legitimacy comes from the defendant admitting to guilt—or at least appearing to do so. Practices range widely, with some courts even tolerating plea bargains en masse with nothing particularly individualized about the process.…

    • 1547 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Critics argue that because bargains so drastically reduce sentence lengths, without them, prison populations would skyrocket. However, the exact opposite is true. In 2016, the National Registry of Exonerations found that 46% of all exonerations in 2016 came from people who had originally pled guilty (“Exonerations”). The reason our prisons are so excessively populated is because, among the wrongfully convicted, half were there because they were intimidated into accepting a plea bargain. In other words, we put so much pressure on entirely innocent defendants that they plead guilty, thus forcing them into incarceration, wasting taxpayer dollars, and exacerbating our prison overcrowding predicament.…

    • 1439 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics