Plea Bargain Vs Plea Bargaining

Decent Essays
A plea bargain is a negotiated agreement. The negotiation agreement is between a criminal defendant (and defendant attorney) and a prosecutor where the defendant either plead guilty, not guilty or non non contend (much like guilty plea). The plea bargaining allows the prosecutor to lessen the time that is needed to prepare for a trial. A plea bargain requires the judicial consent but is regularly welcomed because it also cut down the courts workload. Usually the defendant’s plea bargain affect a guilty plea with a lesser charge

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Review: In 1975, Attorney General, Avrum Gross, declared a prohibition on plea-bargaining in Alaska. Michael Rubinstein and Teresa J. White from National Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice were assigned to study the impact of Gross’s decision. Their first task was looking at whether the policy had been carried out by the courts in Alaska, and second, was what the effects were on Alaska’s criminal justice system. This involved conducting 400 interviews of the surrounding judges in Alaska and collecting information from 3,586 case files. Overall their goal was to create a detailed description of the Alaska system during the “before and after” years.…

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plea-bargaining is an important process in the criminal justice system and are used to prevent lengthy trials. It is defined as “the process of negotiating a guilty plea involving either charge bargaining, where the prosecutor will offer to reduce the severity of the charges or the number of counts in exchange for a guilty plea, or sentence bargaining, where the prosecutor will agree to recommend leniency at the sentencing stage” (Hemmens, Brody, & Spohn, 2013). However, there are both pros and cons with plea-bargaining. One reason why plea-bargaining is an advantage to the court system is because it helps to relieve caseloads since the prosecutor’s workload decreases when a defendant takes the bargain. Also, when a defendant goes this route,…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plea bargaining is a deal offered by the prosecution to the defense, which would be a guilty plea with a lighter sentence. The prosecution, defense, and judges all play a role in a plea bargain. Although it offers several benefits. , the plea bargain has faced much criticism from the public. However, the plea bargain has become a significant part of the criminal justice system in the United States, with only 4% of cases actually going to trial because of these deals.…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Westward Expansion Vocabulary Rewrite the definition in your own words. Remember you cannot use any form of the word being defined in your defintion. Term / Concepts Dictionary Definition Your Definition - Remember you cannot use any form of the word being defined in your definition.…

    • 1396 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plea bargaining most often takes place before the beginning of a trial. It is the process by which the defendant and the prosecution work out a conclusion to the case, subject to court approval. For the prosecutor, the purpose of plea bargaining is to ensure a defendant gets punishment. For the defense, it is a way to get a lesser charge than if the case were to go to…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plea Bargaining Process

    • 212 Words
    • 1 Pages

    You succinctly described how the Plea and Plea Bargaining phase is an important but controversial part of the Juvenile Court Process. As you noted through your law enforcement experience, many see plea bargaining as a miscarriage of justice. While it does bring an otherwise weak case to some type of closure therefore ultimately saving the time of the court and money for the tax papers, it does not truly bring justice for the victim(s) or the community. “Counterarguments hold that plea bargaining with juveniles is an unregulated and unethical process” (Siegel & Welsh, 2014, p. 360). This is one of the many gray areas that the juvenile court system has as apposed to the adult system.…

    • 212 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Making it much harder for a guilty plea to be tossed. This also brings into question his or her creditability, changing your statement after some time to think about it may seem odd to some. Changing a plea is easier done by the defendant, if he or she has favorable evidence against the prosecutors case. This evidence may be the lack of creditability the prosecutors main witness, DNA evidence or something that can confirm his or her…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plea bargaining is a widely used tool to wrap up cases quickly and efficiently. However, there is going to be no plea bargaining in a case when a defendant is not rewarded for pleading guilty. There is no incentive in pleading guilty when you are going to receive a sizeable prison sentence regardless of whether you admit to committing the crime or not. Trials are costly procedures and it would save the Canadian taxpayers a substantial amount of money if the trial could be averted. Mandatory minimum sentencing instead plays a direct role in expanding the number of cases that will go to trial (Frost, 2006).…

    • 1854 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The judge has the power to accept or deny the plea deal, and part of this process is to deny sentences that stray too far from the Sentencing Guidelines. Kosman writes that it is even encouraged for the prosecutor, defendant, and judge to agree to a plea sentence “explicitly calculated according to guidelines” (Kosman 806). Federal district courts that have denied these motions for sentence modifications, and federal circuit appellate courts that have upheld such rulings based on assumptions of the plea sentence and the per se rule have clearly demonstrated the overall trouble plea bargains have caused defendants. While plea bargains have clearly not been the best deal for defendants who are often first-time offenders, such a high rate of cases ending in plea bargains demonstrates the ubiquity and power of the practice in the American criminal system. This facet, combined with the disparity in crack cocaine sentencing has produced even more unjust outcomes for defendants who were offered sentence reductions by the Sentencing Commission, and reflects the harsh reality of plea bargains in the American criminal…

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Around 95 percent of cases are plea bargained. Without plea bargaining, the court system would be drowning in cases and the right to a speedy trial under the 6th amendment would be virtually impossible. The court system in the United States is already overloaded with cases waiting to be heard, and the added cases resulting in the elimination of plea bargaining would be catastrophic for the criminal justice system. What plea bargaining does is allow the prosecutor to offer a lesser charge and, in turn, the defendant waives their right to a trial. It allows the court system to move along faster and deal with the offenders who commit more serious, heinous crimes.…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The mayor of ACME city has made a discretionary decision, based on her opinion of criminals getting off easy due to plea bargaining, to ban the practice of plea bargaining by prosecutors. This discretionary decision is based off of the opinion that criminals are being let off easy and not being properly punished through the process of plea bargaining. Nevertheless, this decision is not a decision that should be agreed with. The argument against the mayor’s decision will be demonstrated through the positive effects that plea bargaining has on courts including the defense, prosecution and judges along with their staff and resources. Secondly, the penalties of removing plea bargaining would not solve any crime problems but would create and inequality…

    • 1307 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this justice system, people convicted of nonviolent drug crimes get prison times that are not appropriately scaled to the crime they may or may not have committed. These sentences include prison for life, a sentence that are given to cases of murder, abuse, rape, treason, terrorism, trafficking, severe cases of fraud, and other crimes that can possibly get the death penalty if the states allow it. This is largely the fault of a large drug crackdown during the 70’s and official laws were passed that unfortunately resulted in these unbalanced sentences. These laws must be revised to fix prison times and their excessiveness.…

    • 337 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The District Attorney has discretionary power to decide the disposition of cases. One of the primary ways that the District Attorney uses its’ discretion is in how he processes plea-bargaining. The District Attorney may reduce a defendants’ exposure to a crime if he provides some pieces of information that he needs to prosecute a bigger player in the narcotics trade. It has been said that the administration of justice is a selective process in which only those cases that will not overload the system will ultimately be prosecuted (Cole, 1970)…

    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Oftentimes when a person experiences a loss or a loved one going through a fatal illness or disease, they go through what is called through the five stages of grief. In the novel Drums, Girls, & Dangerous Pie by Jordan Sonnenblick, the main character Steven Alper goes through the five stages of grief. Because Steven’s little brother, Jeffrey Alper is found to have leukemia Steven starts to suffer the symptoms of the stages of grief. The five stages of grief being denial, anger, bargaining, depression, and acceptance. The first stage the main character Steven goes through is denial. To be in the stage of denial means to refuse the reality of the situation. For example, when his mom tells him that she is taking Jeffrey to Philadelphia…

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1939, the term “white-collar crime” began to be associated with frauds committed by business and government professionals. The phrase was mentioned during a speech given by Edwin Sutherland to the American Sociological Society. Sutherland defined “white-collar” as “a crime committed by a person of respectability and high social stats in the course of his occupation” (White Collar Crime). However, white-collar crimes are described in various ways. The Justice Department characterize white-collar crimes as deceit, embezzlement, forgery, or a breach of trust that does not result in threatening into anything physical or violence (United States Justice Department).…

    • 1844 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays