Plea Bargain In Law Abiding Citizen

Improved Essays
Law Abiding Citizen is a movie about how easy it is for a criminal to get out of harsh punishment the easy way and how one man dedicates his time to prove the justice system is flawed. In the movie, this man’s name is Clyde Shelton and his family is murdered right in front of him. A plea bargain is made by his lawyer, Nick Rice with one of the murderers. The plea bargain causes Clyde to seek justice in his own way and try to prove the American justice system is flawed by setting an example of cheating his way through certain laws. Clyde uses his engineering and CIA skills to do what he can to try and fix the flaws in the American justice system. While he is seeking justice, he hurts some innocent people along the way. Clyde did what he did …show more content…
“Prosecutorial budgets would only allow prosecution in those cases where there was strong evidence to convict” (Devers, Plea and Charge Bargaining). Therefore, Clyde’s lawyer offered a plea bargain to Darby because he did not believe there was enough evidence to convict Darby and his accomplice. So instead of trying to get the justice that Clyde and his family deserved he allowed Darby a plea bargain so that his conviction rate would not go down. “Plea bargaining is a defining, if not the defining, feature of the federal criminal justice system” (Devers, Plea and Charge Bargaining). This means that plea bargaining takes a big role in the justice system, some believe that without plea bargaining the number of cases coming to trial would be reduced. Plea bargaining is just an easy way out for criminals like Darby to get a minimum sentence instead of what he deserved and Clyde is not going to let that happen. Clyde just wanted Nick to learn not to make deals with …show more content…
When he said, “I’m gonna pull the whole thing down, I’m gonna bring the whole freaking diseased, corrupt temple down on your head. It’s gonna be biblical,” (Gray, Law Abiding Citizen). He was not kidding. He murdered many people just to prove his points and to make people more aware of how corrupted the justice system is. In the movie, everything he did led to the next step of his plan and the justice system was doing everything he wanted it to do. All he wanted was to prove the justice system was flawed and attempt to fix it. In his mind it was necessary to do the things he did in order to try to fix the corrupted justice

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Defense counsels started to feel that defendants will not be able to pay for the time involved to go to trial, but the prosecutors feel even though they work harder at a trial they are not having to decide on a sentence in a plea bargain. The judges now have the burden to determine and announce all sentences to defendants. The ban on plea bargaining did not affect the sentences of violent crime charges, but it did drastically change the sentences of Felony 3 guilty outcomes. The defendants convicted of burglary, larceny and destruction of property found themselves receiving longer sentences.…

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plea-bargaining is an important process in the criminal justice system and are used to prevent lengthy trials. It is defined as “the process of negotiating a guilty plea involving either charge bargaining, where the prosecutor will offer to reduce the severity of the charges or the number of counts in exchange for a guilty plea, or sentence bargaining, where the prosecutor will agree to recommend leniency at the sentencing stage” (Hemmens, Brody, & Spohn, 2013). However, there are both pros and cons with plea-bargaining. One reason why plea-bargaining is an advantage to the court system is because it helps to relieve caseloads since the prosecutor’s workload decreases when a defendant takes the bargain. Also, when a defendant goes this route,…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    His self designated need to right the wrongs of the world led him to the case of Donté Drumm. He knew that Donté was being wrongly persecuted because of his race due to the bad evidence and the unconstitutional…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    R Vs Nixon Essay

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages

    After considering both sides of the argument, the author of this paper agrees with the Supreme Court of Canada and their decision to allow prosecutorial reneging of plea bargains. This opinion is based on the goal of the proper administration of justice and the fact that justice Charron made clear in the case that reputations should remain rare (R v. Nixon, para 69). Therefore, there is not the fear that plea bargains can be revoked on a…

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Plea Bargain Advantages

    • 2557 Words
    • 11 Pages

    A plea bargain is when the defendant in a criminal trial agrees to plead guilty in the exchange of a lesser sentence or to have other charges dropped. In theory, a plea bargain is a way to speed up the courtroom process. When applied correctly plea bargains are excellent tools within the criminal justice system. Incorrectly used judgment is cast down from those outside of the criminal justice system.…

    • 2557 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The use of coercion in plea bargains is constitutional according to the Supreme Court. Since plea-bargains for drug courts involve a greater need of coercion than normal court process due to the limited options available, it is considered a leveraging power to help drug users take advantage of the necessary treatment provided. However, the excessive use of coercion has led to many drug offenders entering treatment that are considered understaffed and over capacity (Parsons & Wei, 2015). The excessive use of coercion has also forced a drug courts to choice in behalf of the defendant, since the alternative is facing a jail sentence. Despite the concerns addressed, the courts when challenged of this claim find under the drug court setting that…

    • 1032 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plea bargaining is a widely used tool to wrap up cases quickly and efficiently. However, there is going to be no plea bargaining in a case when a defendant is not rewarded for pleading guilty. There is no incentive in pleading guilty when you are going to receive a sizeable prison sentence regardless of whether you admit to committing the crime or not. Trials are costly procedures and it would save the Canadian taxpayers a substantial amount of money if the trial could be averted. Mandatory minimum sentencing instead plays a direct role in expanding the number of cases that will go to trial (Frost, 2006).…

    • 1854 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plea Bargaining Process

    • 1131 Words
    • 5 Pages

    What is the role of the prosecutor in the plea bargaining process? The role of the prosecutor in a Plea-bargaining process is to get the defendant to come to an agreement to where the defendant pleads guilty to some or many of the charges filed against them therefore bypassing a costly trial preceding. The prosecutor usually offers a reduced punishment if the defendants agrees to their terms. In some jurisdictions prosecutors and the defendant can work with the judges to help them determine what the sentence they will get if they accept the plea bargain. As prosecutor, what would you recommend in an attempt to resolve the case and why?…

    • 1131 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Around 95 percent of cases are plea bargained. Without plea bargaining, the court system would be drowning in cases and the right to a speedy trial under the 6th amendment would be virtually impossible. The court system in the United States is already overloaded with cases waiting to be heard, and the added cases resulting in the elimination of plea bargaining would be catastrophic for the criminal justice system. What plea bargaining does is allow the prosecutor to offer a lesser charge and, in turn, the defendant waives their right to a trial. It allows the court system to move along faster and deal with the offenders who commit more serious, heinous crimes.…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Abolishing the Plea Bargaining System 97 percent of federal cases and 94 percent of state cases end in plea bargains, with defendants pleading guilty in exchange for a lesser sentence (Goode, 2012). A plea bargain is an arrangement that happens between a prosecutor and the defendant in a criminal case. The prosecutor gives the defendant the opportunity to plead guilty to their charge or a lesser charge in order to avoid trial and the possibility of receiving the maximum sentence. While it would seem that plea bargains are equally beneficial to both prosecutors and defendants, plea bargains are overwhelmingly beneficial to the prosecutor and it is the defendant who ultimately can be harmed by plea bargaining. Plea bargaining should be banned because it bargaining circumvents the Constitutional rights for defendants, leads to shortcuts in the judicial system and can lead to increased convictions of the innocent.…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gem of the Ocean is a play centered on individual characters dealing with the tribulations of being African-American and underprivileged and their strive to overcome. The play was written by African-American playwright August Wilson famous for his plays depicting lives of people who were relating to the black experience. Although Gem of the Ocean was not one of most famous plays it still plays an important role in his legacy. The play takes place in the 20th century a period when African Americans were recently freed by the emancipation proclamation. The story mainly revolves around Aunt Ester ( Ancestor ) an aged woman whose guidance and wisdom is often needed by the other following characters in the play.…

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    He is the man who first brought attention to Bauer’s misconduct. Troy was working for a department store packaging boxes when he was caught stealing a pack of gum, a video game, and Chapstick, totaling a price of $27.77, which constituted as petty theft (Bach, 87). He was given an appearance ticket to come to court. Frazier’s judge was Henry Bauer. Frazier assumed that he would have to pay a fine, but instead, “[Bauer] threw Frazier in jail on fifty thousand dollars bail” (Bach, 87).…

    • 1532 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The District Attorney has discretionary power to decide the disposition of cases. One of the primary ways that the District Attorney uses its’ discretion is in how he processes plea-bargaining. The District Attorney may reduce a defendants’ exposure to a crime if he provides some pieces of information that he needs to prosecute a bigger player in the narcotics trade. It has been said that the administration of justice is a selective process in which only those cases that will not overload the system will ultimately be prosecuted (Cole, 1970)…

    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Judiciary also includes police, lawyers, and officials associated with law and order. One corrupt official can corrupt the entire justice system. In the book, Stevenson also talks about a lot of people falsely convicted due to corrupt police and lawyers. One of them is Walter McMillian. “His story was a counter narrative to the rhetoric of fairness and reliability offered by politicians and law enforcement officials who wanted more and faster executions.…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gem Of The Ocean Analysis

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages

    If one person’s inaction leads to the death of another, is he guiltier than someone who committed a violent act that results in a person’s death? In August Wilson’s Gem of the Ocean, Citizen Barlow stole a bucket of nails, but did not come forward when another man was accused. The man subsequently committed suicide due to the false accusation and the significance of being labeled a thief. Another character, Caesar Wilts, shoots and kills a man who was suspected of committing a crime. While both men’s actions resulted in the death of another; who, if either, is guiltier than the other?…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays