Plea Bargain Case

Improved Essays
The Legal system can be incus lice of a Plea bargain. A plea bargain is an agreement reached between the prosecutor and defendant, where the defendant agrees to plead hilt, in return for something beneficial to the defendant, such as a reduced sentence. (Plea Bargain) This essay will include a plea offer from the procurer’s office, a counter offer from the defense council, and discuss the role of the Judge in plea bargain cases. It will also include what factors contributed to the plea offer and justification to the offer.

A significant amount of information required before a plea bargain can be offered. To offer such a plea, the following scenario is being created, to fill in gaps of missing information, understand the defendant’s history and offer what is appropriate for the totality of circumstances and facts. Mario: a person who has previously been arrested for possession of a dangerous drug, on two separate occasions, has again been arrested fir DUI .08 or above and possession of a dangerous drug. For the sake of argument, it has been determined that Mario did not exceed the threshold, for methamphetamine, which is 9 grams, he was in possession of 4 grams of the drug.
With consideration of all facts and circumstances, if:
• The defendant will waive the right to a jury trial and his right to appeal.
• The defendant will waive
…show more content…
A trial by jury, or by judge can occur, or the prosecution and defense can reach an agreement, as to what an appropriate punishment will be, by the defendant, for the crime. There can be lengthy negations between the prosecution and defense council, before an agreement is reached, but this does not guarantee that, the pleas agreement will be accepted by the judge. While a judge will generally defer to the judgement of the prosecution, if the judge has reservations about the agreement, or feels that it is an inappropriate sentence, the judge may adjust and sentence at their

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Review: In 1975, Attorney General, Avrum Gross, declared a prohibition on plea-bargaining in Alaska. Michael Rubinstein and Teresa J. White from National Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice were assigned to study the impact of Gross’s decision. Their first task was looking at whether the policy had been carried out by the courts in Alaska, and second, was what the effects were on Alaska’s criminal justice system. This involved conducting 400 interviews of the surrounding judges in Alaska and collecting information from 3,586 case files. Overall their goal was to create a detailed description of the Alaska system during the “before and after” years.…

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Us V. Williams Case Study

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages

    U. S. v Williams 922 F.2d 737 (11th Cir. 1991) Parties United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit v. Joseph Emmanuel Williams Facts Facts Williams was indicted and charge with three counts and conspiracy to transform cocaine into crack. Mr. William hires a minor to help him transport crack cocaine. He was accused with conspiracy to intent to distribute cocaine violating a federal regulation. Charge II he aided others personnel in possessing and intent to distribute crack cocaine.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plea-bargaining is an important process in the criminal justice system and are used to prevent lengthy trials. It is defined as “the process of negotiating a guilty plea involving either charge bargaining, where the prosecutor will offer to reduce the severity of the charges or the number of counts in exchange for a guilty plea, or sentence bargaining, where the prosecutor will agree to recommend leniency at the sentencing stage” (Hemmens, Brody, & Spohn, 2013). However, there are both pros and cons with plea-bargaining. One reason why plea-bargaining is an advantage to the court system is because it helps to relieve caseloads since the prosecutor’s workload decreases when a defendant takes the bargain. Also, when a defendant goes this route,…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Direct Victim Case Study

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Direct Victim: The direct victim in the case study is a factory manager who explains that he was shocked and horrified by the mess and damage from the crime. His financial losses were not only the cost of the damages, but also the loss of making money the entire day as the day was spent cleaning up the mess (Crosland, P., & Liebmann, M. 2003). Although the financial needs of the direct victim were not met because the offenders were young children and could not repay it; according to the victim motives for participation in our textbook, the victim’s emotional needs seem to have been met. Some of the needs that were met are holding the offender accountable (the offender took full responsibility for his part in the crime), learning…

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    R Vs Nixon Essay

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages

    After considering both sides of the argument, the author of this paper agrees with the Supreme Court of Canada and their decision to allow prosecutorial reneging of plea bargains. This opinion is based on the goal of the proper administration of justice and the fact that justice Charron made clear in the case that reputations should remain rare (R v. Nixon, para 69). Therefore, there is not the fear that plea bargains can be revoked on a…

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In this research paper, an overview of what plea bargaining is, its incentives, and its disadvantages will be discussed in order to show that the disadvantages outweigh the advantages, as well as…

    • 1441 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Jury Indictment Summary

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages

    My news article this week pertains to a grand jury indictment, and where a case will proceed from there. The article I chose has to do with Mark Anthony Carpenter, who was indicted by a grand jury on murder and burglary charges. He is accused of shooting and killing his landlords, Gary and Bonnie Cavish. The next step in this case will be an arraignment in District Court.…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Defending Mr. Juneau Background Information On the day in question, Mr. Juneau was caught up in several mishaps but because of certain conditions, he shouldn’t be held liable for any of them. Three crimes committed, which included the following: • Possession of Nutria- an endangered species- with the intent to distribute; • Theft of gas; and • The murder of the neighbor. All three can be considered very serious offenses and therefore must be thoroughly reviewed so that it can be proven that Mr. Juneau isn’t guilty. Our defense will be that Mr. Juneau is not guilty due to diminished capacity.…

    • 1544 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plea bargaining most often takes place before the beginning of a trial. It is the process by which the defendant and the prosecution work out a conclusion to the case, subject to court approval. For the prosecutor, the purpose of plea bargaining is to ensure a defendant gets punishment. For the defense, it is a way to get a lesser charge than if the case were to go to…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The legal system in America still allows for racial exclusivity and discrimination on members of minority groups. The plea bargaining process is used in the legal system to help resolve criminal cases and supports the basic structure of the legal system but does not support the due process rights of criminal defendants. Plea Negotiations Support the Structure of the Legal System The adversary system is the legal system in which prosecution and defense are opponents, or adversaries, and present cases. The goal in an adversarial system is not to determine the truth but to win. The majority of criminal cases are resolved through plea bargaining- a guilty plea by the defendant in exchange for recommendations of a lesser punishment or reducing the original charge.…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In chapter 10 of Examining Wrongful Convictions: Stepping Back, Moving Forward our authors Take a look into our plea-bargaining systems role into wrongful convictions. According to our authors plea- bargaining dispose of roughly 95 % of adjudicated criminal cases (Maguire, Tbls. 5.24.2008, 5.46.2006). Over my years of taking criminal justice course I have learned to so many innocent people actually plead guilty to crimes they did not commit. DNA evidence which lead to an exoneration is evidence of just that. Wrongful convictions produce out of our Plea Bargaining are much less likely to result in an exoneration due to the defendants own admittance.…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The judge has the power to accept or deny the plea deal, and part of this process is to deny sentences that stray too far from the Sentencing Guidelines. Kosman writes that it is even encouraged for the prosecutor, defendant, and judge to agree to a plea sentence “explicitly calculated according to guidelines” (Kosman 806). Federal district courts that have denied these motions for sentence modifications, and federal circuit appellate courts that have upheld such rulings based on assumptions of the plea sentence and the per se rule have clearly demonstrated the overall trouble plea bargains have caused defendants. While plea bargains have clearly not been the best deal for defendants who are often first-time offenders, such a high rate of cases ending in plea bargains demonstrates the ubiquity and power of the practice in the American criminal system. This facet, combined with the disparity in crack cocaine sentencing has produced even more unjust outcomes for defendants who were offered sentence reductions by the Sentencing Commission, and reflects the harsh reality of plea bargains in the American criminal…

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    oluntary Manslaughter: Voluntary manslaughter is the conviction given if a defendant who would otherwise have been found guilty of murder, successfully pleads one of two specific defences. These two defences are provocation, and diminished responsibility, and are both laid out in the Homicide Act 1957. The defence of provocation was a common law defence before the Homicide Act was created and brought into power. It is currently detailed in section three of this act, and is a two-part test.…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The District Attorney has discretionary power to decide the disposition of cases. One of the primary ways that the District Attorney uses its’ discretion is in how he processes plea-bargaining. The District Attorney may reduce a defendants’ exposure to a crime if he provides some pieces of information that he needs to prosecute a bigger player in the narcotics trade. It has been said that the administration of justice is a selective process in which only those cases that will not overload the system will ultimately be prosecuted (Cole, 1970)…

    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brothel Boy Case Study

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages

    With the help of the villagers, Blair was able to research the life story about the brothel boy, along with the crime he committed. The Brothel Boy is far from a boy, as he is roughly twenty or so years old, who was born and raised in the Brothel. He was the son of a woman who worked in the brothel as a prostitute, but died shortly after the boy’s birth, and a man who was unknown. Therefore, the brothel keeper took him in to raise him. It was extremely apparent that the boy was uneducated and retarded, “The boy was obviously stupid.”…

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays