Plato's Arguments Of Socrates 'Crito'

Improved Essays
Balraj Singh
Philosophy 10
February 23, 2017
Socrates’ Argument In the dialogue, "Crito" by Plato which is a conversation of Socrates with his friend Crito, and Crito is trying to convince Socrates to escape in order to avoid the death penalty by the Athenian government. Socrates brings up the argument against escape by the Laws of Athens, and in this argument, he points out a lot of reasons why he should not escape, based on the Laws of Athens. In this paper, I will analyze why I am in agreement with the laws argument that Socrates puts forward against his escape. Due to Socrates always trying to analyze everything, the first thing he tries to figure out is who he will hurt if he is to escape. Socrates said, "if we leave here without the
…show more content…
Socrates says in the voice of the laws, "For consider what good you will do to yourself or your friends by breaking our agreements and committing such wrong. It is pretty obvious that your friends will themselves be in danger of exile, disenfranchisement, and loss of property" (53a). The laws are saying that the individuals who aid Socrates' escape will also receive punishments. This brings us to the idea that breaking this agreement with the laws will not only hurt the person breaking the agreement, but may also hurt the individuals that are close to this person. I believe that Socrates would never escape because the consequences are just too large, and his intentions were to always uphold his agreement with Athens. Socrates also says in the voice of the laws, "Will there be no one to say that you, likely to live but a short time more, were so greedy for life that you transgressed the most important laws" (53d). Socrates knows that he already lived a long and good life in Athens, and escaping will only make him seem greedy for only a few more years of life at his old age of 70. Escaping would not only make him seem greedy, but the laws will also punish him wherever he goes. Socrates says in the voice of the laws, "Possibly, Socrates, if you do not annoy anyone, but if you do, many disgraceful things will be said about you" (53e) The laws are trying to say that if he Socrates escapes, he will always be known as somebody who is corrupt, and his intentions are to corrupt others. The laws will never allow Socrates to live at peace if he escapes because he will never live at peace after

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    As you can see, Socrates has many reasons to live, but he chose to obey the state. (Waterfield,…

    • 1322 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The final reason Socrates presents against Crito’s offer of help is the Agreement Argument. The Agreement Argument follows that by participating in Athenian society, the citizens of Athens have implicitly agreed to obey the Laws. Socrates made an agreement to the State to follow the Laws, and it is just to keep to one's agreements, and so to escape would be to break an agreement and so Socrates ought not to escape with Crito (Plato, 1997b, §51c-52d). This agreement refers to is a form of political obligation which relies on the idea of tacit consent, which is formed solely by living as a citizen of Athens. Tacit consent is the idea that by living in Athens, the citizens have agreed to follow the Laws of Athens implicitly by benefiting from the organization, protection, and education of the State.…

    • 1501 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates, more than most, ought to be as per this agreement, as he has carried on seventy years completely content with the Athenian lifestyle. If Socrates somehow managed to break from jail now, having so reliably approved the social contract, he would be making himself a bandit who might not be welcome in some other enlightened state for whatever is left of his life. Furthermore, when he bites the dust, he will be cruelly judged in the underworld for carrying on shamefully towards his city's laws. Subsequently, Socrates persuades Crito that it would be better not to endeavor a getaway.…

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Then, Crito gave Socrates three different kinds of arguments for why Socrates should escape from the prison, and…

    • 1456 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Socrates, the classical Greek philosopher and one of the founders of western philosophy, was accused by the people of being an atheist and corrupting the youth with his ideas. He was, then put into trial in which the jury decided that he was guilty, and finally he was sentenced to death. While being in the prison, waiting for the execution process, Crito, one of Socrates’ friends, came to visit him offering a plan by which Socrates can escape from prison before the day of his execution. However, Socrates refused to escape the death sentence. A large argument took place between Socrates and Crito concerning whether Socrates shall escape or not.…

    • 167 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    If Socrates escaped a wrongful doing is that considered a legitimately wrong? Martin Luther King did the opposite of waiting, he had had enough…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Throughout their conversation, Crito discusses with Socrates why he believes Socrates should flee. However, this leads Socrates to question the power of state and the laws. The Laws that make up the state is a crucial factor in “Crito”. In fact, the Laws are so important in Socrates 's discussion that they become a voice, almost like another person. He thinks thoroughly and examines them because he believes that every citizen has an agreement with Laws.…

    • 1507 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He also accepts his fate stating that, “it is not difficult, O Athenians! to escape death… it is much more difficult to avoid depravity.” All of his life Socrates taught philosophy and forward thinking, and if he had gone back and begged for a fine or for jail he would’ve thrown away everything he had taught to his students and everything his life had supposedly stood for which is to be moral just and virtuous. Socrates goes on to say that the judges should punish his sons and pain them as he had pained them if they were to exhibit signs of depravity by holding things like money before virtue.…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Do you think Socrates did the right thing by allowing himself to be unjustly executed? Socrates had made an intelligent decision by sacrificing himself to protect the “Social contract” between the state and him, rather than escape from prison to break the rules. Use life to exchange for the preservation of his thought Escape from the prison is equivalent to destruct all of his thought and value what he had constructed during his lifetime. Because leaving Athens is kind of actions to contradict what he taught to his followers, be faithful to the righteousness.…

    • 989 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Wentz, “ In the Apology Socrates is represented as condoning disobedience. First (29d) he states that he would “never stop practicing philosophy” even if so ordered by the jury at his trail. Second (32 c-d) Socrates proudly tells of his disobedience to the Thirty Commissioners when they ordered him to go to Salamis to get Leon. Thus, there is at least apparent inconsistency between the Apology and the Crito on the question of disobeying the law. ”(Wentz).…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antigone Vs Law Analysis

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Although Socrates has questioned authority in the past, I claim that he does not desire to repudiate against the very government which raised him, unlike Antigone. Socrates justifies his point in a conversation with his friend Crito, opposing any plans…

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Perhaps Socrates realized the courts were right in his sentence because he was not truly wise and had in fact corrupted the minds of the youth. Or, maybe he knew that if he was to be acquitted of the charges he would continue his teachings and probably end up back in jail, and would rather not waste the time and effort. Or, maybe Socrates’ love of Athens and the respect he had for the government and the courts decision stopped him from fleeing his death…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Even Pericles himself acknowledged that the “ease in our private relations does not make us lawless as citizens” (Carnes et al., p. 91). What keeps our Athenian brothers in check is the safeguards we have had in place for centuries- societal rules. To prevent us from abusing our freedoms, our forefathers taught us “to obey the magistrates and the laws… whether they are actually on the state book, or belonged to that code… unwritten” (Carnes et al., p. 91). Breaking the laws chiseled in stone is of course a serious offense which will be met with proper punishment, but Socrates has not broken any laws.…

    • 1263 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He does not run away saying I have lived my whole life in Athens have benefited for it greatly just because I no longer benefit does not mean I can just run away when I no longer favors me. Socrates even uses his last dying breath to show case we wait until the last minuet to tie up loose ends, by asking a friend to pay off some trivial debt. Socrates and Descartes were alike in a bevy of ways, they were both trying to change a way of established thinking, both were trying to get down to what is truth and what is false. Both do have stark differences like Descartes being afraid he would be sentenced to death and Socrates seeing death as liberation. They lived completely different live and in different lifetimes, ones’ mission in life was to improve society the other to build a new house of…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If someone had told him then he would have known better not have done it. Socrates also believes that without him the entire city will turn ignorant and will never know what true wisdom is and tells the court that he is helping the people of this city by keeping their minds active. When the jury decides that Socrates was indeed guilty they let him choose his punishment of being exiled or going to prison. Socrates said that he did not want to be exiled because Athens was his home and he did not want to leave his home, he wanted to stay there and help the society. He chose the punishment of being fed by the government…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays