Plato's Notion Of The Soul Motive Analysis

Decent Essays
Plato looked at the soul in parts. Plato’s notion of the soul was with motives. The question then arises for the soul to have basic human motives. These motives, which can be qualitatively different from one another, usually have pleasure as the soul motive. Words like love and hate are just degrees to these motives. For Plato, he only believed in the rulers, guardians, and business. Plato thought that the individuals psych should mirror the political. The business class being the largest, was mirrored by the Hedonic and Egoistic category. This was believed to be the sole human motive. Although there are some dual motive people which follow the theories of Kant and Locke. Plato on the other hand believed in the concept of the tri-motive. The tri-motive people have various parts. It begins with the wants or “appetites”. Then there is reason and in between the two there is spirit. Spirit is more so referred to as emotions. Plato’s basic point is that wants can be very strong in people and the emotions aid the reason. Motive between each other are different. For the wants motive it provides the person with the end to their actions and goals. To Plato, these are considered irrational and passive. When looking at …show more content…
In this scene the lighting is dark and smoky from the cigarettes being smoked in the area. There were areas that it seemed to have the lighting more directed in particular parts with the spotlights like lamps. The two talked and properly introduced themselves to one another. In this part of the movie I believe that this scene showed that the woman liked the doctor. The woman’s face is brightly lit even in the presence of an unknown mistake. Her face being brightened by the light represents her new found feelings for the doctor. This light showed her also showed her encompassing innocence to this emotion. Her exchange of laughter ended the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In Rep. IV at 436b-c, Socrates puts forth the the principle of division. This principle provides a means to rationally and plausibly divide the soul into parts. Socrates states that the “same thing will not be willing to do or undergo opposites in the same part of itself, in relation to the same thing, at the same time” (436b). What this means is that a single body can not have opposite processes that occur simultaneously. For example, Socrates provides the example of someone who is standing still while their hands and head move (436c).…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Also in “Self-Constitution in the Ethics of Plato and Kant”, by Christine Korsgaard, Plato's constitutional model says that the procedures that unify a city are based on the actions that unify a person's soul. This makes a city appear to be an agent, "it is not just a place to live, but rather a kind of agent which performs actions and so has a life and a history. And we can see the same three parts in a political decision" (Korsgaard 105). Plato believes that reason is used so people can be well-functioning agents. He says that when people have decisions to make, reason has to come in and choose which desire or appetite is best to act on.…

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    None of the three components are good or bad on their own, but in Plato’s writing, the right direction of a human individual and the human society is kept when the mind is in charge.…

    • 1781 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Plato’s Republic, Socrates establishes a soul with three parts to it: a calculative, a spirited, and a desiderative. The calculative contains the knowledge of good and bad, the spirited part contains the courage to carry out the will of the calculative, and the desiderative seeks those animalisitc neccesities such as food and drink. Socrates establishes an aspect of the soul that is distinct from the other parts, when he says, “Isn’t there something in their soul binding them to drink and something forbidding them to do so, something different that masters that which bids?” Socrates goes on to further say, “doesn’t that which forbids such things come into being - when it comes into being - from calculation, while what leads and draws is present due to affections and diseases?” One can clearly see how the calculative part is meant to guide and drive both the desiderative and the spirited parts of the one’s soul.…

    • 1088 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    By this, Plato meant that reason did not overcome spirit, spirit did not over come appetite and so on. The soul was essentially balanced. Plato believed that a soul that is in disorder is miserable and that person will never achieve happiness. He compared the soul to that of a city. An ideal city is that where all parts of the city are working together.…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    For in Plato’s Phaedo, the soul is understood to merely be harbored in the body for a brief period. According to the Argument from the Form of Life, the soul, as being what gives life to a body, is the form of life thereby and cannot admit the opposite form, which is death (Plato 105D). Hence, the soul is indeed deathless (Plato 105E). We can see that the establishment of a kind of dualism motivates this argument. The soul is successful characterized as completely distinct and separate from the body.…

    • 1885 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates Soul Analysis

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This section of “Plato’s Republic” demonstrates key ideas of the soul from Socrates view point. From the start of this section Socrates introduces his ideas to Glaucon. Socrates believed that cities have three attributes. He goes on to explain that since the attributes of a city come from the people living within, the soul must also be split into three attributes. Socrates attempts to break down the soul into three different categories; the part of the soul that learns or thinks (rational), the part of the soul that desires pleasure, and the part of the soul that is spirit.…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the Phaedo, Plato provides several arguments in an attempt to prove the immorality of the soul. In this essay, I will focus on his Final Argument, which describes the Forms as causes, subject to destruction or displacement when the particular undergoes some change. Next, I will show how Socrates applies these ideas to argue for the immortality of the soul. Finally, I will present a few reservations I have about the validity of this argument.…

    • 1675 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He believed that both body and soul are parts of human nature. The soul is the total of the operations of human beings. Aristotle tries to explain his understanding between body and soul using an analogy of an axe. He explained that the body would be metal and wood.…

    • 1360 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Plato and Machiavelli disagree about the circumstances which justify a lie. Plato believes that political leaders must lie if that is necessary to pursue justice and thereby lead the city well. Machiavelli also believes that lying is a method of establishing political order but, unlike Plato, believes that lying should be used as a method to maintain power for power’s sake – not for some greater purpose. Although in most circumstances Machiavelli and Plato disagree, occasionally, they agree. For example, they may agree to lie to the philosopher kings about the marriage lottery system in certain cases.…

    • 2022 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Plato wanted a government in which personality was defined by roles and were organized by the needs of human nature. He proposed that those who demonstrate leadership should hold power, and due to this belief, he felt…

    • 2041 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plato values, above all else, unity. He defines the greatest evil as anything which splits his city into factions, and furthermore, the greatest good as anything that “binds it together” and makes it one. He also says that “all the citizens alike rejoice and are pained at the same comings into being and perishings”. Plato’s idea of a perfect city essentially revolves around the city behaving as one entity. The community he envisions is so tightly intertwined that they experience the same emotional response to events, as if they are one being.…

    • 1094 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Form Of Beauty Essay

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Self-predication: the Form of Beauty is itself beautiful. But this is different from the way in which all other beautiful things are beautiful. Every other beautiful thing is beautiful because it ‘participates in’ the Form of Beauty; but the Form simply is beautiful. It is what it is in virtue of itself.…

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plato had many ideas about human nature, but his stemmed from a route that many Philoshipers failed to examine. Plato believed that Human nature had much more to do with our souls then our bodies. Plato states that the principal task of the soul is to pursue knowledge this we can decipher from the Allegory of the cave. Although Plato believed that the soul has three parts the Logical part, the Spirited and the Appetitive. The Logical part of the soul is responsible for the search for knowledge and truth, while the spirited part Plato identified with anger and temper, lastly the appetitive part of the soul Is responsible for love, sex, hunger and thirst; Plato theorised that the appetitive is generally opposed to the logical side of the soul.…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    When attempting to solve the problem concerning the immortality of the soul, both Plato and Hume must rely on analogy. Plato, being a rationalist, argues that the soul is immortal and is comparable to a form, for it is invisible and incomposite, unlike material objects. Hume, on the other hand, believes that the soul is mortal and compares souls to perishable objects such as bodies. Although neither analogy can offer any validity, Hume 's argument for the mortality of the soul is far more compelling than Plato 's opposing argument.…

    • 1519 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays