Cycle Of Opposites In Plato's Phaedo

Improved Essays
Plato’s Phaedo is a philosophical work that takes the form of a dialogue between Socrates and a group of his acquaintances, including Thebans, Cebes and Simmias. The dialogue is told from the perspective of Phaeton, a student of Socrates’, and in the work Socrates and his friends discuss a number of theories and topics, including The Cycle of Opposites Argument, The Theory of Recollection, The Exclusion of Opposites, and the Affinity Argument. Through the use of the mentioned theories, Plato illustrates the supposed nature of the soul, and attempts to form an argument as to why it must persist perpetually. Two primary ideas Plato uses in the work to argue for the immortality of the soul are the Cycle of Opposites Argument, and The Exclusion of Opposites. The Cycle of Opposites …show more content…
The theory states that a thing can never admit to be the opposite of what it is. For example, an odd number can never be even, and vice-verse. Socrates expresses this in the dialogue by saying, “not only do we find the opposites that we spoke of refusing to admit each other, but all things which, while not mutually opposed, always possess opposites, themselves likewise appear not to admit the character which is opposite to that contained in themselves; when that character advances on them they either withdraw or perish” (190). In this, Socrates communicates the idea that in order for things to go through a process of change, their opposites need to either cease to be, or become unperceivable by the senses. For example, in order for an object to be moving at what can be considered a fast speed, it cannot be perceived by one’s sight that it is moving slow. The same is true for an object moving slowly; in order for its speed to be perceived as slow, the opposite fast cannot be present. Socrates goes on in the dialogue to use this to attempt to prove the immortality of the

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    The purpose of the Theaetetus is to examine how the mind accounts for knowledge by seeking an answer to the question Socrates poses to Theaetetus, what is knowledge? (146A). After a few failed attempts at answering, Theaetetus posits that knowledge is true opinion (187B). Socrates responds that in order for one to know what true opinion is, he must also account for false opinion in the mind. Ultimately, while the dialogue produces no operative definition for knowledge, Plato employs this dialogue to sharpen his arguments for what are and are not the brackets of knowledge.…

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It describes the final conversations between Socrates and his close friends before he is put to death. The entire dialogue focuses on the matter of death and what happens to our souls after we die. Socrates presents four arguments to prove the immortality of the soul, one of which is the “Argument from Opposites,” in which he conveys that all things come to be in existence from their opposites. This is Socrates’ first argument that he presents, and although it is supported with great detail, it lacks the support that is necessary to prove that the soul is immortal. Socrates uses an extensive amount of contradictory opposites to support his claim such as sleeping and waking up, and faster and slower, however these do not properly compare to being alive and being dead because they are contrary opposites.…

    • 1169 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Secondly, Socrates shows that perception is private and unique by appealing to the fact that perception differs from person to person. Lastly, Socrates appeals to the fact that perception is private and unique by appealing to the fact that an individual can perceive the same exact object in two different ways on two different occasions. On these grounds, it necessarily follows that the properties that can be abstracted from an object, without impacting the essence of said object, properties such as size, warmth, and color, neither exist in the perceived object, nor in the individual perceiving the object. This is what Socrates means when he says that “things such as size or warmth or whiteness belong neither to the object we measure ourselves against of touch or to we who are doing the measuring or touching”…

    • 1247 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Slave Boy In Meno

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Coursework Part B What, according to Socrates, does the example of the slave boy in ‘Meno’ tell us about knowledge? What do you think that it shows? The example of the slave boy serves to demonstrate Socrates’s infamous claim that ‘all learning is recollection’. Around the time that Plato was writing, there was a common view among philosophers and academics that if you know what you are looking for, enquiry is unnecessary, and if you don’t know what you’re looking for, then enquiry is impossible.…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates Soul Analysis

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Socrates continues his point, and compares that example to that of a spinning top. Something that is spinning is still moving, while it looks like it isn 't due to our perception. When it starts to wobble humans no longer perceive the top as stationary. Socrates uses the axis and the circumference in reference to the parts of the soul, when all the parts work together perfectly it’s as if it’s not moving.…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The resulting conclusion is not solely immortality – it is an boundless cycle of reincarnation. If life goes into death but death never back into life, then there will be no life and all things will remain in the state of death. Further, if there is no everlasting cycle of death and life, and if there are a finite number of souls, then ultimately every living thing will be dead. However, we should not rush death. Socrates believed that man should never kill himself since we have no ownership of ourselves.…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to this view of reality, the physical self inherently wants those things which the philosophers of the time thought of as evil (Phaedo, 66b). Clearly in all of this, this philosopher is demonstrating that he identifies not with his physical self, but rather almost exclusively with his mind. Perhaps the boldest statement in this regard is made through Plato’s usual representative character, Socrates, in…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the Phaedo, Plato provides several arguments in an attempt to prove the immorality of the soul. In this essay, I will focus on his Final Argument, which describes the Forms as causes, subject to destruction or displacement when the particular undergoes some change. Next, I will show how Socrates applies these ideas to argue for the immortality of the soul. Finally, I will present a few reservations I have about the validity of this argument.…

    • 1675 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the Republic, Plato introduces many of his viewpoints and ideals through arguments. Some examples of what he introduces are what defines a city, principles of specialization, the tripartite soul and the sun, the line and the cave. In this paper, we are going to focus on the tripartite soul argument and the nature of justice. The tripartite soul argument states that a human soul is divided into three distinct parts that all want to achieve different goals. The soul, according to Plato, is composed of a rational, a spirited, and an appetitive factor.…

    • 1330 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    During the Golden Age of Pericles ' Athens, Plato, an intellectual individual, set out to understand the relations that occurred between the body and the soul. With immense studying of his former teacher, Socrates, Plato came to his realization that the body and the soul were in fact separate from one another. Not only are the two separate, but he discovered that the soul itself is immaterial and immortal and wishes nothing more then to (insert freeing the body quote). Plato’s understanding of the body would not have been possible without Socrates’ theories of opposites, recollection, and scattering of objects.…

    • 1568 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plato uses Socrates belief in the soul 's immortality to prove the necessity of the theory of recollection in the fulfillment of true knowledge. Thus, Plato develops the idea of the soul 's repeated reincarnation and suggests that the soul 's learning is forgotten by the event of birth in a new body, and the growth of knowledge within the mind during a lifetime is simply the recollection of knowledge from the soul. Meno is always questioning Socrates and his questions then leads to further discussion that proof recollection. Socrates instructs Meno to" pay attention then whether you think he is recollecting or learning from me"(82b). Socrates question Meno 's attendant on the area of a square figure with four sides that are equal.…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Argument for the Immortality of the Soul When Socrates and Meno are halted in their argument by a paradox, Socrates proposes a new idea that will solve the paradox and continue their conversation. He states that the soul is immortal and it has learned everything in past lives. Thus, what men call learning is actually a process of recollection. I will first be giving context as to how this idea came into the dialogue with Meno. Next, I will explain how he puts the same idea forward in Phaedo and then noting the differences between the two dialogues.…

    • 1885 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If this desire and aversion are opposite forces, then given the principle about non-opposition, it follows that this desire and aversion are forces of different things conflicting in the person. Socrates concludes that the human psychology has at least two parts. The appetitive part of the soul has the desire, and the part of the soul that reasons has the…

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Glaucon Justice Analysis

    • 1584 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In order to show that human’s soul is plurality, Socrates uses the principle of opposites – a single thing is never characterized by opposites at the same time, in relation to the same thing, and in the same respect. Since this principle must be true, it is impossible for one thing to be conflicted. Sometimes, it appears that a thing is beautiful and ugly at the same time; whenever such situation occurs, it must mean that there is more than one thing. For example, there will be no contradiction if a chair is beautiful and ugly at the same time, as long as it is beautiful in respect to its form and ugly in respect to its color. Otherwise, a chair must be either purely beautiful or purely ugly.…

    • 1584 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    For in Plato’s Phaedo, the soul is understood to merely be harbored in the body for a brief period. According to the Argument from the Form of Life, the soul, as being what gives life to a body, is the form of life thereby and cannot admit the opposite form, which is death (Plato 105D). Hence, the soul is indeed deathless (Plato 105E). We can see that the establishment of a kind of dualism motivates this argument. The soul is successful characterized as completely distinct and separate from the body.…

    • 1885 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays

Related Topics