The Quarrel Between Philosophy And Poetry: From The Republic, Book X

Improved Essays
Abby Kochevar
Philosophy 101
Southgate
December 7, 2016
Philosophy of Art
Art has inspired many if not most people throughout society with murals, structures, painting, and music. Art is created in a variety of forms every day in a variety of ways. Some people believe that art is a more significant aspect to the world than others. Some people can point the art in anything, while some cannot find art without it being pointed out for them. When listening to music some may think “I just like this song,” but to others it may be a piece of art that changes the way someone feels. Art can also be disguised as entertainment which is less appreciated than if it were looked at for what it is, which is art. The philosopher Plato’s idea of art shows the importance it has on society with his argument in his piece, The Quarrel Between Philosophy and Poetry: From The Republic, Book X, I cannot agree with his stance on art in that it is not beneficial to human life or society by expression and creativity. Plato’s view on art is something that most would disagree with in todays society. He believes that art does not benefit society or human life, but it just creates pleasure. He uses two
…show more content…
He does create a solid argument for why art is not beneficial in his writing of The Quarrel Between Philosophy and Poetry: From The Republic, Book X in which it isn’t necessary except for pleasure. In my opinion, Plato does not value the connection between society and humans with feelings and expression. Art is something that should be able to show creativity and openness to the world, but to Plato, this does not bring new knowledge so therefore it should be disregarded. Art is shown everywhere without people even realizing it, but if you look at the bigger picture art shows a deeper level of meaning and understanding that cannot be expressed in any other

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Plato's Conception Of Art

    • 1130 Words
    • 5 Pages

    I could create them as they appear to be. But not, I take it, as they truly are". The meaning here is that although an artist may be able to "recreate" something is his art, like the mirror can recreate a person's image, they are both only imitations of the real thing, and thus lacks truth. Art glamorizes these imitations, painting them in a positive light to the masses. Essentially, as Plato goes on to state, these imitations are a far cry from the truth.…

    • 1130 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates Poetry Analysis

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Plato has beliefs that do not separate aesthetics from ethics because his concerns with poetry are purely ethical. Nehamas believes this causes a significant philosophical embarrassment because it suggests Plato does not understand the real value of art and that there is much more than just the ethical part of the art. Furthermore, Plato makes his greatest objection against poetry because the kind of person that one would be ashamed to resemble because of unethical behavior is admired in poetry. Socrates states that instant gratification is the cause of this absurd line of thinking among…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The use of chance is nihilistic in that it removes any logic or ordered system, but he also sees it as a positive force. The rearrangement and destruction of their pieces were implemented to keep the subject pure of any possible human contamination, which Aldea would argue is not an expression of nihilism. He relates the use of chance to God as it is beyond earthly knowledge and logic. Aldea’s final point was Dada’s need to decontextualize and stay away from any personal attachments to work, to avoid artistic death. Art needed to be decontextualized, along with man.…

    • 1762 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Whether or not the artist had intended to have a specific effect on the public is irrelevant, many times art does have an effect on people’s perceptions positive or negative. Imagination is what gives art life metaphorically. If something is not imaginative at an artistic standpoint, it has no influence over people. Consider if Shakespeare was not imaginative, his writings would not have been as valued as they are today. Art should have a limit on whether or not it should have a political or social function.…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Socrates, as a philosopher, goes around asking and questioning people on their beliefs and their knowledge. This is something that some gods do not approve of for it means Socrates is acting outside his human realm. By Euthyphro’s definition, Socrates is impious because he is doing something some gods do not approve off. Only actions that all gods approve off are considered to be pious. However, if an action is already deem to not be pious, then it does not matter if all gods hate it, the people will see it was impious regardless.…

    • 1448 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Hearing the truth often hurts but it is one of the greatest ways to grow. By closing himself off to critics, to the general public, and to performers, it is not allowing contemporary music to progress. However, Babbitt wants the contemporary music field to expand and move forward, but his actions hinder any progress to be made. It is difficult for critics and the normal listener to judge Babbitt’s music for what it is. His music is based off of science and algorithms rather than an artistic approach.…

    • 1520 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Even though, Aristippus believes that real happiness is a lifetime of accumulated pleasures, he doesn’t believe rational calculation is an essential part of the pursuit of happiness. Aristippus says we should not calculate because it takes us away from the moment. Aristippus believes that pleasure is a moment to moment thing. He thinks we should not sky hop through life trying to see how we are doing because that takes away from the pleasures in life. Aristippus says accumulation of pleasures but he also says that counting or looking at your pile is tiresome, so you should avoid that.…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In my opinion, Lord Henry does not deliberately attempt to destroy Dorian’s life, however he is cynical in the fact that he treats Dorian’s soul as inconsequential and therefore is able to use Dorian as type of puppet with no restrictions. This undoubtedly represents Lord Henry’s hedonistic influence as in fact responsible for the change in Dorian Gray’s nature although he might not intend for Dorian to be led to his demise. In conclusion, through the art of influence and manipulation, Lord Henry’s influence on Dorian Gray is rather unfortunate since he never had the opportunity to discover himself as well as his values; it was rightfully taken away from him. And because of this, Lord Henry is considered to be entirely responsible for the transformation that Dorian undergoes. Consequently, Dorian becomes lost in the immorality of sinfulness and is led towards a life filled with guilt, murder, and self indulgence all due to the corrupt, persuasive statements that Lord Henry deliberately…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alcibiades cannot relate to Socrates because they are different. It is not in peoples control if they have the characteristics to follow the view of Socrates; but it is within human nature to find satisfaction in the shared view of Aristophanes and Alcibiades. There view does not require a constant, it does not ask for the ideal conditions that are rare; it merely asks for compromise of partners and to seek out experience. The view does possess the risk of confusion, hurt and hardship—these risks possess value. If one decides to learn from the turmoil of love, they can become wiser and be strengthened as a person.…

    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Perhaps because he sees that there is no relevance in having personal relationships with humans for it would only create personal chaos, and that is why he does not prioritize it. But nature, on the other hand, is more constant and it would always affect him and that is why he allowed the sun and the heat to control his mood. In Sartre’s “An Explication of the Stranger”, the author clarifies how Meursault exemplifies this absurd nature. “The absurd resides neither in man nor in the world...but since man’s dominant characteristic is ‘being-in-the-world’, the absurd is, in the end, an inseparable part of the human condition” (Sartre). In…

    • 1472 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics