Comparing Plato's Rulers And Hobbes

Improved Essays
In Plato's ideal state, there are three classes in society. There are the laborers and the guardians; the guardians are split up into two classes: the auxiliaries and the rulers. The auxiliaries are the soldiers of the state, and they carry out the decisions that are made by the rulers. The rulers job is to solve conflicts among the people of the state, and make decisions regarding policy. Plato says that the guardians need to be the people who have the most love for the community. The rulers are chosen because they are the best of the guardians, so they need to have more love for the community than anyone else. Because of this, they will be happy knowing that the state is in good shape, they don't care about material things so much. In order …show more content…
Plato believes that certain people are superior in their physical and intellectual abilities. Plato creates the myth of metals as a way to rank people. The myth of metals says that people have different metals in their composition. Rulers have gold, auxiliaries have silver, and the laboring class has bronze or iron. Although Plato obviously doesn't believe that people have different kinds of metals in their souls, this myth still proves that he thinks certain people are above everyone else. Rulers can only be the elite few who are composed of gold. This myth is also how the rulers are chosen—as a ruler can only be a person that is composed of gold, and no other metal (Plato 182). Hobbes, on the other hand, disagrees with this. He thinks that all people are roughly equal when it comes to physical and intellectual abilities. Even if there were somebody superior in the state of nature, Hobbes argues everyone else would be able to team up to out-muscle even the strongest man, or out-wit the smartest. Because of this, the way the sovereign is chosen is also different than in Plato's society. Hobbes says that a sovereign is put in power in one of two ways: institution or acquisition. Institution is when the people of the commonwealth agree to submit to some person or group of people in the hopes that they will protect them against all others. Acquisition is a commonwealth which is established by force. An example of this would be when a victor in war subjugates the vanquished. These are the two ways the sovereign is chosen or gains power in Hobbes' society (Hobbes ch. 13,

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Plato’s Position on Justice in Comparison to Dante and Machiavelli Plato asserts his position on justice throughout “The Republic.” His views constitute a model for how society should behave based on the values presented by Socrates in the dialogue. From Plato’s teachings we can infer that to establish justice, we must establish several principles in our lives including proper education, moderation, and courage. Although Plato describes how to live a just life through the metaphorical creation of a city, as opposed to focusing on the individual or going about the concept in a more abstract manner, he also asserts that justice is the quality of the soul, and a soul can only be pure if temptations are ignored. Socrates concludes that education and obedience are parallels.…

    • 1281 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his Republic, Plato makes the claim that “only philosophy can save us” (Book V, 573d). Thousands of years later, Alexis de Tocqueville wrote Democracy in America. Many scholars summarize his beliefs as, “only institutions can save us”, a direct repudiation of Plato. In this paper, I will show that, in fact, Plato’s philosophy is embedded in Tocqueville’s Democracy in America, specifically revolving around the preference for community and collectivism rather than private gain.…

    • 988 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes, strongly supporting a sovereign government to control political and social order, debates the evils of man’s free…

    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    ‘For Hobbes, the purpose of politics is to escape war. As such, he insists that in order to establish a democratic political order, all individuals need to hand over their will to a single point of ultimate authority’ (Field, 2015). Due to their beliefs on human nature, Hobbes and Machiavelli shared comparable principles with regards to the need of a sovereign ruler, and the requirement for a functioning supreme power in order to control the people. In the enlightenment period in which Hobbes wrote in his book the Leviathan about the human nature of people, he, similarly to Machiavelli, described that they were selfish and war-prone. Hobbes believed that people are not born with the understanding of what was right…

    • 1550 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Definition Of Justice In Plato's Republic

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited

    He will tell the citizens the gods assigned them to their class because they are best suited for that job. The rulers would have gold in them, the soldiers would have silver, and the craftsmen would have iron or bronze. It is, however, possible for them to move from one class to another. This is mentioned because Plato understands that it is possible, for example, for a craftsman’s son to have the abilities to become a soldier or vice versa. The last virtue is of course justice.…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plato, towards his philosophy gives important places to the idea of justice. “Good Governance” is like a phase that has become a part of the vernacular of a large range development. In Plato’s Republic, Plato argues about the kings should become philosophers or vice-versa philosophers should become kings, or even a philosopher king. Today’s democracy is finely defined as government of the people and by the people. Plato argues that only a certain type of education is available for only a few people.…

    • 1075 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Plato and Machiavelli looked into what is best for people and a government structure that can bring to a better society, happiness, and wealth for everyone. Both Plato and Machiavelli focused on a civil society that would work to secure the rule of law and protecting individual’s freedoms, as well as stability as a whole. They agreed that a government or a ruler would have to work for conditions that will bring prosperity of his citizens and a pleasing and satisfactory way of living. These two philosophers were too realistic in emphasizing a political structure of how government should perform to keep its citizens satisfied overall. Plato, for instance, was expecting an ideal government or a “just’’ society that would promote justice for…

    • 1521 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plato's Virtue Analysis

    • 108 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Plato taught that every person should focus on the virtue that was most necessary for ones position in society. The most noble of virtues was justice to one’s self, or rather justice is to act in a manner that reflects what is inherent in one’s soul. True satisfaction, according to Plato, can be found in preforming the task to which you are most suited, wither it was what you wanted to-do or not. If every citizen were to place the needs of the state above one’s own happiness then as a collective the state and those in it would be conforming to an order that is the…

    • 108 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Thomas Hobbes and John Locke both agree that subjects shall summit to a sovereign their right and obligations such as, judgment and consequences. It can be due to both having the notion that their ideal ruler(s) should have some sort of authority towards their men. In order to guide them to peace. Also by doing this their sovereign(s) can be portrayed as superior and subject’s inferior by having more rights and entitlement than them. In other words, it creates some hierarchical system where both Hobbes and Locke ideal ruler(s) authorize all that occurs within society and subjects shall be obedient with minimal input.…

    • 2054 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is a paper comparing the Aristotle and Hobbes understandings of human nature. Aristotle states that man is a “political animal”, and that it is thus natural for man to live in a polis. Hobbes disagrees with this understanding of man a political animal, as he claims that man is actually a greedy being that is driven by power. Thus he feels that the natural state of man is a state of war. Although the two disagree initially about the man’s natural state, Aristotle comes to agree with Hobbes’ view since they agree that without a common sense of justice that individuals have no reason to live together.…

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plato In The Republic, Plato acts as a scribe and recounts a particular evening that his teach Socrates had spent with his fellow Greeks, discussing various political topics. In the book, Plato outlines what Socrates’ thought justice was, and what a perfectly just city (the “city of speech”) would be like. One of the foundational principles in Plato’s just city is specialization. Each person does what they are best at, and don’t meddle in another’s affairs.…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes advocates for extensive government power to protect people from the state of nature. He thinks that everyone is a bully. Eventually, one particular bully proves to be stronger and able to bully more than others. At this point, the other bullies follow in line with this big bully which not only strengthens this bully, but also keeps the other bullies safe from the “lead” bully so to speak. Hobbes says that that is how government is formed.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Socrates begins by dividing up his city into three distinct classes of society. He states that in ideal city consists of producers, auxiliaries, and guardians. The producing class consists of farmers, craftsmen, artisans, and anyone else preforming a trade. The auxiliaries are the warriors of the city, which help keep the city in order. Last, the guardians are the rulers of the city.…

    • 1038 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Aristotle and Plato’s World View on Democracy In this essay I will explore the views of democracy and the education of the people and reasons why Aristotle had a favorable view on it more than Plato did. In relation, Aristotle and Plato were great thinkers far beyond their time in philosophy. However, they had two very different world views on democracy and oligarchy.…

    • 1354 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Plato’s The Republic, he posits that the perfect city will be virtually homogenous, and that there can be no division in the citizens of the city if it is to succeed. Aristotle, on the other hand, claims in his Politics that the perfect city will be as distant from that of Plato’s as possible, and instead will have a variety of different people within it. As Aristotle’s argument evolves, however, he determines that the citizens of a city should still be similar in a variety of ways and that the city must have some unity in order to thrive. Plato’s view of unity within his republic in speech is relatively simple. He argues that if there is any division within a city, it will not be ideal.…

    • 1094 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays