Similarities Between Plato And Aristotle

Decent Essays
Plato and Aristotle influence the world through their philosophical works. Two popular philosophical works are The Republic by Plato and Politics by Aristotle. Both works explore the concept of society and how a society should be made up. When Plato and Aristotle were living, Plato was a mentor to Aristotle. Although Aristotle respected Plato as a mentor, their philosophical works and beliefs differ. Through both of their works, Aristotle and Plato explore the concept of the common good. Both Plato and Aristotle believe in the common good of society, yet their approaches for developing the common good differ. Plato approaches the common good in an idealist manner based on a dualistic conception where the body and soul are two distinct entities …show more content…
Plato strongly believed in an idealistic society. Within Plato’s society, each individual had a specific task that they were suited for. Ultimately, doing what one is suited for will positively benefit the entire society. Plato’s ideal society consists of three classes: guardians, artisans, and auxiliaries. Guardians rule others. Auxiliaries are the warriors. Artisans are all people that are not guardians or auxiliaries. Although the guardians rule others, Plato believed they were not to have their own personal …show more content…
Plato’s society encompasses three distinct classes, yet he states, “our aim in founding the state was not the disproportionate happiness of any one class, but the greatest happiness of the whole,” (Plato Book IV). Plato emphasizes the importance of the happiness of each class, not just the highest class. It is possible that the guardians are the happiest individuals, but is that realistic? In general, the guardians within Plato’s society sacrifice their immense talent in a subject such as philosophy or mathematics and rule others. Their sacrifices may not lead to pure happiness, but ultimately, the society aims for happiness for the entire society, therefore, the guardians, artisans, and auxiliaries will all encompass a common happiness. This common happiness is the common

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Plato’s Position on Justice in Comparison to Dante and Machiavelli Plato asserts his position on justice throughout “The Republic.” His views constitute a model for how society should behave based on the values presented by Socrates in the dialogue. From Plato’s teachings we can infer that to establish justice, we must establish several principles in our lives including proper education, moderation, and courage. Although Plato describes how to live a just life through the metaphorical creation of a city, as opposed to focusing on the individual or going about the concept in a more abstract manner, he also asserts that justice is the quality of the soul, and a soul can only be pure if temptations are ignored. Socrates concludes that education and obedience are parallels.…

    • 1281 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the Republic, Plato initially sets out to define justice, and in this quest, illustrates the ideal society. His entire philosophy is based on the idea of parts coming together towards the whole. This applies to both the just person as well as the model state. In…

    • 988 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. Plato believed that justice is good in itself, or “an intrinsic good”. He showed this by arguing in the Republic that justice is an essential part of living a happy life. In the Republic, Plato separates the soul into three parts he calls reason, spirit, and appetite. A moral or just person would be a person whose soul is functioning in equilibrium.…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Plato’s Republic, Thrasymachus and Socrates fall on opposite sides of the debate over whether leading a life of justice or injustice results in happiness. Thrasymachus argues justice in and of itself has no intrinsic value, but it is the appearance of justice that benefits the individual. Socrates, on the other hand, insists appearance alone is not enough but being truly just leads to an inner life of peace and balance. The unjust person experiences a turbulent internal existence, which leads to a life of misery and despair. I will argue that Socrates, despite making a strong case for the just city, fails in his argument for the happy life of just person.…

    • 2032 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kallipolis is a perfectly structured society in which justice is achieved at the social and interpersonal realms. It is ruled by a philosopher king, who maintain the peace and harmony in the ideal society. According to Plato in The Republic, the philosopher king possesses the qualities to be the rightful king to rule in Kallipolis. Philosophers are qualified to rule because they have a understanding of the Forms or the truth, their wisdom allows them to understand justice and their knowledge makes them superior than others. However, a philosopher can be a tyrant in disguise.…

    • 1641 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the Republic, Plato introduces many of his viewpoints and ideals through arguments. Some examples of what he introduces are what defines a city, principles of specialization, the tripartite soul and the sun, the line and the cave. In this paper, we are going to focus on the tripartite soul argument and the nature of justice. The tripartite soul argument states that a human soul is divided into three distinct parts that all want to achieve different goals. The soul, according to Plato, is composed of a rational, a spirited, and an appetitive factor.…

    • 1330 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Definition Of Justice In Plato's Republic

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited

    He will tell the citizens the gods assigned them to their class because they are best suited for that job. The rulers would have gold in them, the soldiers would have silver, and the craftsmen would have iron or bronze. It is, however, possible for them to move from one class to another. This is mentioned because Plato understands that it is possible, for example, for a craftsman’s son to have the abilities to become a soldier or vice versa. The last virtue is of course justice.…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Plato and Machiavelli looked into what is best for people and a government structure that can bring to a better society, happiness, and wealth for everyone. Both Plato and Machiavelli focused on a civil society that would work to secure the rule of law and protecting individual’s freedoms, as well as stability as a whole. They agreed that a government or a ruler would have to work for conditions that will bring prosperity of his citizens and a pleasing and satisfactory way of living. These two philosophers were too realistic in emphasizing a political structure of how government should perform to keep its citizens satisfied overall. Plato, for instance, was expecting an ideal government or a “just’’ society that would promote justice for…

    • 1521 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plato was an early Greek philosopher who instituted the Academy and is most well-known for his writings of unparalleled influence. Throughout his life, Plato had written many dialogues over numerous subjects, some being justice, epistemology, political philosophy, and even theology. One of Plato’s most successful and widely read dialogues was the Republic. Before the Republic, many of Plato’s dialogues consisted of a speaker, Socrates, refuting the positions of his interlocutors, and many of the dialogues do not end with an adequate answer. However, the Republic delivers a position in which Socrates takes on justice and its relation to happiness.…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the Republic, Plato discusses and relates the three topics that are central to one lives, education, justice, and happiness. Through his definitions of these three topics, he considers how a society can achieve the proper education, justice, and happiness leading to his understanding of human nature. Plato addresses the close relation between being just and happy to the education received in society. The relationship between education, justice, and happiness depends on Plato’s understanding of these topics. Specifically with the relations of justice and happiness, the relationship is just as much dependent on the true sense of the idea as it is with Socrates rejection of the false claims.…

    • 1741 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Plato’s Gorgias, Socrates and Callicles engage in a debate about what it means to be happy and to live a flourishing life. According to Callicles, a person is happy and flourishing when he or she is living as ambitiously as he or she possibly can. Living the good life includes chasing one satisfaction after another and having a constant influx of pleasure. In contrast, Socrates emphasizes on the idea of eudaimonia, according to which a happy and flourishing person is one that lives an orderly life, in which the person maintains discipline and control over oneself.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Each group must perform their function and only that function. They must not interfere in any other business to uphold the political justice that is formed in the city. At the end of Book IV in Plato’s Republic, Plato attempts to mirror the political justice with individual justice. He claims that each of these classes of society are analogous to a three part structure of the soul.…

    • 1038 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    In Plato’s ‘Republic’, happiness and justice are deeply questioned and analyzed as being interconnected. The broadest assumption of a happy person is one who is most wealthy and with very much power. This is almost an unspoken truth, however, does it really work out? One of the most famous Greek philosophers was Socrates, a son of a stonemason who encouraged discussion among many elite, powerful men. In the Republic written by Plato, the idea of a happy person is dissected thoroughly by Socrates and explained.…

    • 1622 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Republic by Plato is not a commandment in which all societies to adhere to. Instead, it is a dialogue proposing an ideal state where there are rulers and those who are ruled. Inherently known, there must be virtues established as well as a hierarchy of people who are in this society. Throughout the Republic, Plato imposes on Socrates and uses him as a mouthpiece to deliver the ideas. Even to this day, the comments in the Republic as well as the philosophical ideals implemented in this dialogue, are unknown as to whether Socrates himself has said it, or Plato.…

    • 1287 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Aristotle and Plato’s World View on Democracy In this essay I will explore the views of democracy and the education of the people and reasons why Aristotle had a favorable view on it more than Plato did. In relation, Aristotle and Plato were great thinkers far beyond their time in philosophy. However, they had two very different world views on democracy and oligarchy.…

    • 1354 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays