Programs like Planned Parenthood were introduced into the American society. “Planned Parenthood was started as a grass roots organization.” (39) Shakens argues the word “planned modernized the organization and planned parent hood distanced itself from its prior incarnation by adopting a metaphorical framework of planning.”(39) This is a unique example since Planned Parenthood was started as a grassroots organization and ended up becoming a federal program. He suggests their success is that is because of a consensus and value that the public found in Planned Parenthood. This grass roots approach is unlike another representation he gives upon this assumption though all planning movements would call for a redesign of the American way of life. If the planning movement were to be successful it would be started from the community and then be adopted to the federal level. This idea of planning in lives is more personal because it deals with contraception and is a physical and living question that this organization provides a service desired and perpetuating public health. Shakens equivalents the word planned and the ideas associated with the word for being what popularized and revolutionized change in the Planned Parenthood because the word turned it from its dated ways. He seems to be …show more content…
Planning is abstract in talking about its ideas of what people are and does not show diversity found in people when trying to generalize plans. This is because planning’s end goal is to “make materials and human resources of the nation and organize them in order to end industrial capitalism.” (17) This mentality would correlate to a nation during times of war, this is because it’s a collective ideal in the public, because of a shared hardships caused by war and how it effects populations. Planning generalizes everything to make things universal. Planning does take into account clear differences in human cultures. These collectivist ideals presented by planning would simmer out by the end of WWII. Shakens version of planning was an all-powerful social movement. Planning for the post war world was not needed because the social mentality of the country changed. The homefront had a collective hand in the fight and after the there was no collective agenda. Post war planning would tie the American government closely with the socialist society of Russia who would become Americas main opposition after WWII. This is because during the post war life of victory it would contrast the American values and beliefs that had run off the free market. In response to these anti socialist agendas the government disband the NRPB as to distance itself from these socialist coined ideas. If planning were