Pinto Vs Ford Auto Company

A Car has been an essential modern mechanical device for everyone with the mean to purchase one. We have come to rely on them and expect the automaker to take consideration of our daily need with safety in mind. In reality, auto company often thinks more about the bottom line first than customers. The auto market has a lot of competitors who perform constant research. Every business is trying to catch the interest of consumers. Ford auto company tries to stay in line with its competitors by creating a compact car model pinto. The model car was created in the late 60's with some complications. Upon the launch of the pinto several issues were reported and some have resulted in personnel death(Shaw & Barry). First, when a car mode is created, a prototype is made to find flaws within the overall system. Testing went on to see if the release of the car would be a smooth transition. During testing, engineer technician found flaws with the fuel tank. Moreover, the technician believes it would be wise to delay and make the necessary repair. The executive of …show more content…
Ford Motors failed the public by knowing putting in the market a vehicle that was not completely safe. Moreover, advisors within the company broke down the amount of money it will take to fix the problem, but it will delay the release of the car into the market. The Executives felt it would cost too much to repair the issue and the release may be delayed for a few years. Numerous lives were perished since the inception of Ford pinto. Through it all, Ford found ways to deny its implication in the whole matter and the car has met the government regulations (Shaw & Barry). Lastly, the executives chose to use the theory of Relativism /Subjectivism. Basically, there is not an unique moral that applies the Pinto controversy. In reality, it could be interpreted by the person position in the mix of the