Reference: Unlawful racial and national origin discrimination; malfeasance, misfeasance, nonfeasance, malversation, et. al.
Dear Equal Opportunity Specialist Roberts:
License airplane pilot Timberlake petitions you concerning the misinterpretation and interpolation of Section 113 of the Alien Flight Student Program (AFSP) identification (ID) rules, to unlawfully discriminate. WSCC’s officials are enforcing Section 113 of the AFSP ID rules upon this us citizen exemptee. They are requiring this US FAA licensed pilot to submit a current passport, birth certificate, to honor the requirements of Section 113 of AFSP. WSCC officials pontificated that airman Timberlake FAA certificate and current Alabama driver’s license are insufficient identification documentation.
As an enrolled WSCC student, my citizenship has been established with the college. Thus, WSCC officials’ pronouncements that student …show more content…
Thus, he is exempted from and he has fulfilled AFSP rules’ Section 113 requirements; he is exempted from being vetted as if he is an alien or a new aeronautical candidate, etc. To facilitate his compulsory biennial flight review and instrument proficiency checks, airplane pilot Timberlake needed the services of fixed-based operator WSCC. In spite of pilot Timberlake being an US citizen and an exempte, WSCC representatives rejected student Timberlake’s perfected flight technology program class enrollment application for ground school, etc. Hence WSCC officials renounce student Timberlake’s perfected enrollment application; their renouncement stated, student Timberlake presented unaccepted and insufficient documentation. The true reason WSCC officials rejected student Timberlake’s perfected enrollment application is racial and national origin discrimination. Student Timberlake’s race is Black and his national origin is
Dear Equal Opportunity Specialist Roberts:
License airplane pilot Timberlake petitions you concerning the misinterpretation and interpolation of Section 113 of the Alien Flight Student Program (AFSP) identification (ID) rules, to unlawfully discriminate. WSCC’s officials are enforcing Section 113 of the AFSP ID rules upon this us citizen exemptee. They are requiring this US FAA licensed pilot to submit a current passport, birth certificate, to honor the requirements of Section 113 of AFSP. WSCC officials pontificated that airman Timberlake FAA certificate and current Alabama driver’s license are insufficient identification documentation.
As an enrolled WSCC student, my citizenship has been established with the college. Thus, WSCC officials’ pronouncements that student …show more content…
Thus, he is exempted from and he has fulfilled AFSP rules’ Section 113 requirements; he is exempted from being vetted as if he is an alien or a new aeronautical candidate, etc. To facilitate his compulsory biennial flight review and instrument proficiency checks, airplane pilot Timberlake needed the services of fixed-based operator WSCC. In spite of pilot Timberlake being an US citizen and an exempte, WSCC representatives rejected student Timberlake’s perfected flight technology program class enrollment application for ground school, etc. Hence WSCC officials renounce student Timberlake’s perfected enrollment application; their renouncement stated, student Timberlake presented unaccepted and insufficient documentation. The true reason WSCC officials rejected student Timberlake’s perfected enrollment application is racial and national origin discrimination. Student Timberlake’s race is Black and his national origin is