Terminal illnesses rarely end peacefully and painlessly. The treatments for diseases such as cancer can leave the recipient sick and weak, often times accompanied by chronic pain. There is also the possibility of “opiate resistant pain” meaning that there is virtually no way to treat their pain with medication. Consumerreports.com states in a 2010 survey, that 1,000 people taking opiates for chronic or long-term pain reported having moderate to severe pain. This means that most of the medications prescribed for pain would become useless against the pain faced by a terminally ill patient. Many terminally ill patients also begin to lose organ function towards the end of their life, meaning in order to keep living; they need the assistance of machines and tubes, greatly destroying any quality of …show more content…
People believe that people are often in the wrong state of mind to make such decisions at the end of their life. Not just anyone can request a life ending prescription; certain criteria must be met in order to receive physician-assisted suicide. In states already enacting the death with dignity laws, two licensed physicians must determine that you are mentally competent and have a terminal illness that will result in death in six months or less. You also must be 18 years old and self-administer the prescription. (deathwithdignity.org).
Other people in opposition to physician assisted suicide see potential religious or moral conflict with the program. Stating that is against certain religious believes to commit suicide, and that it is against a doctor’s code to assist someone in dying. The process of physician-assisted suicide is completely voluntary on both the doctor’s and the patient’s behalf, meaning if it is against a certain code or religion, they under no circumstances have to participate. But, a survey done in the UK in 2010, 78% of those who attended a place of worship at least once a month supported assisted dying