Summary
Both articles I have chosen …show more content…
It contains the argument of two nurses, one against and one for physician assisted suicide (Sanders & Buchanan, 2012). The first nurse who speaks is an “active supporter,” her name is Karen (Sanders & Buchanan, 2012. p. 8). First she explains ‘The Commission on Assisted Dying’, what it includes and who it applies to (Sanders & Buchanan, 2012). It is about setting specific safeguards in place in terms of eligibility for assisted suicide (Sanders & Buchanan, 2012). Karen goes on to talk about three of her concerns around assisted dying (Sanders & Buchanan, 2012). The first being the role of the nurses and the significance they would have in this situation (Sanders & Buchanan, 2012). Also our importance and role in helping doctors determine if patients meets the specific safeguards that are laid out (Sanders & Buchanan, …show more content…
This isn’t something that I would encourage for somebody, or even bring up in conversation to a patient. Having said that though, if a patient requests information on the subject of course I am going to supply it for them and support them on whatever decision that they choose to make. Both articles had very good points and fought a good battle on opinion and I don’t think there was a specific area that I disagreed with the writer about. All things debated in the articles were very valid and served a good point, not only for patients and family members but also for healthcare