Freedom To Die

Superior Essays
Freedom to Die Death is a waiting game that no one truly knows when it will occur. With physician assisted suicide that waiting game is not an obstacle to terminally ill patients. “Physician-assisted suicide is the practice of providing a competent patient with a prescription for medication for the patient to use with the primary intention of ending his or her own life” (MedicineNet). In 1997 the United States Supreme Court ruled that physician assisted suicide is not a constitutional right; changing their ruling in 2006 the court decided that the choice should be up to the states (Pickert). This is giving terminally ill Americans the right to their lives. Many would say that physician assisted suicide is doctors breaking all ethical rules …show more content…
“Ira Byock, told 60 Minutes correspondent Steve Kroft it costs up to $10,000 a day to maintain someone in the intensive care unit” (Court). Patients who live with a terminal illness are faced with thousands of bills to cover their medical expenses. In the article “The Cost of Dying” it goes into detail about patients who was receiving end of life care. “The real problem is that many of the patients that are being treated aggressively, if you ask them, they would prefer less aggressive care. They would prefer to be cared for at home. They 'd prefer to go to hospice. If they were given a choice. But we don 't adequately give them a choice," (Court). More aggressive care means more money, at the end of Meredith Snedeker’s mothers life she received $40,000 worth of care within two months. Luckily Medicare and the U.S. Government typically covers medical bills with no questions asked after a patient passes away. But just imagine the stress and financial burden these medical bills put on patients and their families If physician assisted suicide was legal in all fifty states America would be giving the absolute freedom to terminally-ill patients. The freedom to choose what he or she would like to do with their final days on Earth. The people of America need to that their morals out of the government and allow citizens to have rights. The U.S. Constitution gives citizens the right to vote, the American people are able to have freedom of religion, why can they not have the freedom to end their own life if they are terminally-ill? Patients who meet the criteria deserve to choose how they want to live their life. Especially if they are already contemplating suicide they should be able to end their life safely under the care of a physician to ensure if they do live there will be no complications. Patients deserve to die peacefully and should not have to be in pain any longer. Physicians who are helping

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Physician assisted suicide, P.A.S, has been a topic of interest for many years and the argument still stands on whether or not it should be legalized entirely in the United States. A few states, Oregon, Vermont, Washington, California and Montana, have already legalized physician assisted suicide. The state of Oregon passed a Death with Dignity Act in 1996, and was the first state to make Physician assisted suicide legal. There 's an argument on both sides as to whether or not physician assisted suicide is morally right as well as whether it should be legalized throughout the entirety of the United States. There are some people who see the positive side of it; the elderly and sick will no longer be in pain and can be relieved of their suffering.…

    • 1551 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many wonder if euthanasia is right and moral and if it is not what should be done when being faced with this situation. I think the best way to look at physician-assisted euthanasia is through consequentialism and deontology. It’s important we look at the consequences of physician-assisted suicide because they are literally the difference between life and death. A patient that is gravely ill or in a coma may be diagnosed and given a time limit until death, however, some patients have surprised their doctors.…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Poor families do not have the means to spend a great amount of money on medical care. Emanuel and Battin stated that: “To many, savings from reduced use of expensive technological interventions at the end of life are both necessary and desirable” (Emanuel & Battin). This is a true statement for all social classes in America, but especially the lower class. It is almost impossible for them to afford that amount of medical care, and that is why physician-assisted suicide is a better option in this case.…

    • 1539 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Death With Dignity The nation’s eyes opened when twenty nine-year-old Brittany Maynard publicly made the decision that she was going to end her life. When she learned that even with surgery her death was inevitable, she moved with her husband and mother to the first state that made the Death with Dignity Act legal, Oregon. Brittany Maynard did not want to die in vain: “She said, “I will rob cancer of the ability to take everything of me before it takes my life”” (Printz). The right to die with dignity is ethical in many cases similar to Brittany Maynard’s and should be available in The United States because people shouldn’t have to suffer severe illnesses, there should be an option available for Physician-Assisted death, which helps with peace of mind, and they should not face a penalty for going about the process.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Americans are taught from an early age that everyone is born with certain unalienable rights. The right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness are characterized as legal truths that cannot be taken away or denied. However, one must wonder if the right to life coincides with the right to die. This is the very question that has sparked controversy all throughout the nation regarding physician-assisted suicide (PAS). To clarify, the right to die is a person’s decision to end their life with the medical help and guidance from their doctor.…

    • 1583 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There has been many controversies over whether physician ­assisted suicide should be legal or not. Many people believe that it is morally wrong and should be unconstitutional. Individuals who support physician assisted suicide argue that it cuts costs, ends pain and suffering, and is not morally wrong. Physician­ assisted suicide is a controversial procedure that should be accepted, legally and morally as it is cost saving, and eliminates suffering from individual’s lives. If legalized, physician ­assisted suicide has “potential cost savings” (Emanuel, 1998, p. 1).…

    • 1359 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Physician-assisted suicide should be legalized because patients deserve the right to determine their own fates, it gives patients an option to end their suffering, and it gives…

    • 1589 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Physician-Assisted Suicide Essay Outline I. Introduction - There is a controversial debate throughout the United States for the last decade regarding physician-assisted suicide for terminally ill patients, many believe having a Doctor prescribe a self-administered lethal drug to a patient is diminishing the value of life. While others believe this method should be the patients’ right to choice when the pain and suffering from a life threatening illness should cease. II. Main Point # 1 - Will Physician-…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There is a difference between Physician-Assisted suicide and euthanasia. Physician-assisted suicide is different from euthanasia because patients are voluntarily killing themselves at their own pace by drugs that they requested from physicians. According to Comfort Care Choices (2010) “Physician-Assisted Suicide is where patients with a terminal diagnosis (life-limiting disease) formally request a prescription for a fatal dose of a drug which they can administer to themselves at a time of their choosing.” Euthanasia is different from physician-assisted suicide because patients are not using drugs from physicians to kill themselves. Rather, euthanasia involves killing patients by using drugs.…

    • 1530 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The constitution states that everyone has the right to life and that does not have anything to do with assisted suicide meaning that an individual should not take their life away. It is only one of the individual rights’. In reality, physician-assisted suicide is not…

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    I. Physician-assisted suicide, under various names and colloquial definitions, has been a documented ethical issue for centuries – not to mention an undocumented ethical issue since the hypothetical dawn of life. By common understanding, physician-assisted suicide is death either directly or indirectly permitted or carried out by a physician. In simple terms, an “out” is provided. For this reason, it is often associated with chronic pain or terminal illness. Suicide where the doctor in charge is directly involved is perhaps the first situation which comes to mind when one thinks of euthanasia.…

    • 2007 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The subject of euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide is a controversial one. Should the decision of whether to end one’s suffering be that of patient autonomy or a matter of the state? Euthanasia is “the intentional killing by act or omission of a dependent human being for his or her alleged benefit.” (Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life, 2015) There are two types of euthanasia, active euthanasia is performed by an action, like a lethal injection, and passive euthanasia is done by omission, like withholding or withdrawing life support.…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    One of the many ethical dilemmas surrounding health care today is physician assisted suicide. Many will misinterpret this as Euthanasia because they both accomplish the same goal, causing the death of a person. However, physician assisted suicide is different because of the way that death is accomplished. Boudreau and Somerville (2014) explain that, “In assisted suicide, the person takes the death-inducing product; in euthanasia, another individual administers it” (p. 2). The physician in the case of physician assisted suicide is removed from the actual act of death.…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although more than half of the United States does not believe in legalizing physician-assisted suicide, five states have already legalized this assistance, which is causing a huge ethical debate in the medical world (“State-by-State Guide to Physician-Assisted Suicide,” n.d.). People who are in favor of physician-assisted suicide are arguing for the respect of autonomy, individual liberty, and compassion. In contrast, people who are not in favor of physician-assisted suicide are arguing for the sanctity of life, fear of abuse, and professional integrity. Physician assisted suicide should be considered unethical in healthcare because of the potential for abuse and the duty of a healthcare provider is to do no harm and maintain life. The principle of non-maleficence and the theory of deontology support my argument against physician-assisted suicide by providing evidence on why it should be considered unethical.…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Euthanasia can be defined as “the act or practice of killing hopelessly sick or injured individuals (as persons or domestic animals) in a relatively painless way for reasons of mercy; also : the act or practice of allowing a hopelessly sick or injured patient to die by taking less than complete medical measures to prolong life—called also mercy killing,” (merriam-webster.com). As with any debate there are those that are for legalizing the mater and those that are against it. Those are against legalizing physician-assisted suicide generally use the moral , and religious reasons, and those that are for legalizing argue separation of church and state, and argue that it should be the person choice. Physician assisted suicide for the terminally…

    • 1631 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays