Summary Of Philosophy And The Meaning Of Life By Julian Bagggini

Improved Essays
Introduction
Philosophy has been a fundamental base for human beings to ponder on the question: “why are we here?” We had drawn numerous questions, and we had come up with countless answers to dare attempt to explain how we came to be a being, and what it means to be a being. Julian Baggini, the author of “What is it All About? Philosophy and the Meaning of Life,” analyzes these questions and different positions to come to an ultimate conclusion that combines all reasonable understandings of the claims. Baggini states that the question could be either about humans’ origin – why are we here, in terms of from what did we come to existence? – and our present and future – why are we here, in terms of why are we living our lives and how are we going
…show more content…
Naturalists have maintained their position in believing that human beings don’t live life to achieve any goals or purposes because we didn’t have any to start with. Opposing to this perspective, Baggini argues that past doesn’t always determine our present lives’ meaning. He gives an example of 3M’s sticky notes. By explaining how post-it became useful when the scientists made faulty glue and wondered, ‘what if we had non-permanent sticky notes?’ Baggini illustrates how original meaning of creation doesn’t always remain in present days. In real life, humans don’t live just by survival instincts; if we did, then we would be living like animals, not knowing how to develop or even create culture and societies that are distinctive from each other. Theoretically, it could be rebutted that scientific researches prove that human beings are made without any purpose in life, and therefore we live without any meaningful goals in life; however, that statement would merely explain how we came to existence in terms of cells and DNA’s, not how we proceed to continuously renovate our ways of lives and live

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    In reality there are only a few differences between human and animal biologically. So why do we treat them so differently. We won’t test on ourselves for risky things so why are we doing it to animals? Animals should not be used for testing because they can feel it, they are helpless, and many of animals die from it every year. Animals should have rights.…

    • 1066 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal Testing Facts

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages

    If we are testing on animals because they are unlike us then why are we testing them for unreliable results? Animals do not deserve to be burned, trapped, locked in tiny cages, suffocated, and taken away from their natural habitat just for another false results that ends up killing a human just trying to get better. All animals are here on this earth to live and love their own life, to be free and to be in their natural surroundings, not to be in laboratories being testing on like a piece of…

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    An example of this is how Bernard is three fourth of an inch shorter than most other alphas and therefore he if different (Huxley). Because they frown upon being different they make each set the same. Our society has no need to make everyone the same in fact I would say they encourage you to be individual. We also may not be ready to be told yet and if the secret gets out people might not like it or will like it and get scared and the world could become like brave new world. Or they might not believe it I don’t think we will get close to having the same scientific technology as BNW because society won’t allow it.…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Apart from animals, baby, comatose and mentally disabled persons are also not to be able to interrogate their action and do not have any rational mind. Does it mean that we can eat them? According to ethical consideration, baby, comatose and mentally disabled persons are given extension rights. People will not eat them and harm them. Nevertheless, why animals do not have the extension rights?…

    • 1725 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal experimentation in fields of product safety and pharmaceutical development is a controversial subject. Those opposed to experimentation often cite the suffering of the animals, the existence of alternate testing methods, and the unproven benefits to human beings, as support for their reasoning, well those in favor of experimentation believe that the benefits to humanity cannot be gained any other way and substantially outweigh the harm done to the animals. In the article, “Why Animal Experimentation Doesn’t Work” by Dr. Aysha Akhtar, she outlines three reasons why animal experimentation should be eliminated. Although Dr. Akhtar argues that stressed animals yield poor data, animals don’t get human diseases, and that animals are not little…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Creationists stand firm to the belief that man did not come from apes. Although creationists do not believe in macroevolution, they do believe in microevolution (Wiker, 2005). Macroevolution is the evolution of species to other species. Creationists believe in microevolution, which states that something can evolve within a species, but cannot evolve from species to species. Creationists are able to support their opposition to macroevolution because there is no evidence to show man came from apes.…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To have a scientifically controlled experiment they would not be allowed to know what essential care was being denied in order to keep the experiments the most objective. One way that psychology has attempted to go around this is by retrospective studies; the studies look at what has already happened instead of working in a controlled environment. These retrospective studies by default cannot differentiate between the cause and effect making their results suspicions and weakening the standards accepted by the psychological community as…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It is not possible to teach even the smartest chimpanzee the idea of God. They would not understand that there might be a heaven and hell, a place they may go after life. Animals see the world at face value; they cannot think about what could be, what may be, and if “x” happened, “y” would ensue. These abstract ideas are limited to humans because they can self-reflect. We have the capability to acknowledge the possibilities of the unknown.…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Harris believes it just appears “out of the darkness.” Additionally, humans cannot trace or find the root of where the thought comes from. Its beginning is a produced by a complex nexus of biology and environment about which no human knows a lot of information on and has no control of. Harris then asks this question; if this is an accurate way to describe and explain this situation and the thought-process, how can we conclude that humans are free and how would that satisfy those who believe that humans are liable for every choice they make? Harris answer is; there is no rational answer that can be given to this response or question. Therefore, free will must be a false…

    • 1331 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animals should have similar rights as people, and we need to learn to share our planet with them. Just because we have more power over most of them, doesn’t give us the right to abuse or torture them, because we wouldn’t on our own kind. Animal testing is pointless, it doesn’t not give correct and reliable results, and it does not benefit either people or animals hugely. Joaquin Phoenix once said, “It takes nothing away from a human to be kind to an animal.” We will not see any negative effects on humans if we start treating animals with the respect and freedom they deserve. It is a factor that is bringing our planet down, and we need to stand up for it, and we could save millions of lives a…

    • 1281 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays