Quite literally, the meaning of philosophy is “love of wisdom”. Ultimately, people take on philosophy as an action when they wish to pursue an understanding in the fundamental authenticity about themselves, the type of world they exist in, and their relationships with the world and the people around them. Those who are naturally drawn to studying philosophy often engage in asking questions, answering them, and also dispute for answers to the most basic questions life may throw at them. In order to get a broader and more systematic sense of philosophy, those who have mastered it have divided it into major areas of study. At the foundation, metaphysics is a broad area of philosophy studying the nature of reality, what really exists in the world, what it’s like and the order of it all. One aim of metaphysics is to answer the most general question: are there rules implementing to everything that is real? If we come from a specific nature of existing and if we can differentiate them from each other? The second aim is to expose what is real, giving us answers to why the things in our life really happen to us. Generally, philosophers in this specific area tackle on questions such as “Is there a God?”, “How are the mind and body related?”, and “What does it mean for one even to cause another?” After metaphysics, the next area would be epistemology.
…show more content…
Epistemology is the study of knowledge. It is mainly distressed with what we can know about our world and the ways that we can know it. Epistemologists separate themselves with a number of tasks and sort them into categories. First, opting the nature of knowledge, what it means when someone knows, or falls short of knowing. To understand this concept, one must grasp the complete perception of knowledge, and how to tell when someone knows something and when someone does not know something. The second is being able to determine the degree of human knowledge, how much do we, or can we know. Can we use our reason, our senses, the evidence of others, and other means to earn knowledge? Is it possible that we do not know as much as we think we do? Should we as humans have genuine uncertainties about skepticism, or that we do not or cannot know anything at all? The third major area is ethics. Going into philosophy, ethics would be a no-brainer. The study of ethics often involves what we should do, and what it would be best to do. With this issue, more questions about what we know is good, and what is bad emerge. Ethicists attempt to answer questions such are “What makes an action or a person good?”, “How can we know what is right and what makes an action right?”, and “Is ephemerality objective or subjective?” Metaethics is a general subject, along with normative ethics, and applied ethics. Metaethics inspects our ethical foundation and what they mean as a whole. Most questions concerning metaethics tends to lean more toward issues having to do with universal truths such as the will of God, and reasons in ethical judgement, and ethical terms all within themselves. Normative ethics is more practical. In this subject of study, ethicists arrive at standards that tell from right and from wrong. This may include expressing good habits that we should get into, obligations we should follow, and the aftereffect of our behavior to others. Lastly, applied ethics involves inspecting controversial issues, such as abortion,
Epistemology is the study of knowledge. It is mainly distressed with what we can know about our world and the ways that we can know it. Epistemologists separate themselves with a number of tasks and sort them into categories. First, opting the nature of knowledge, what it means when someone knows, or falls short of knowing. To understand this concept, one must grasp the complete perception of knowledge, and how to tell when someone knows something and when someone does not know something. The second is being able to determine the degree of human knowledge, how much do we, or can we know. Can we use our reason, our senses, the evidence of others, and other means to earn knowledge? Is it possible that we do not know as much as we think we do? Should we as humans have genuine uncertainties about skepticism, or that we do not or cannot know anything at all? The third major area is ethics. Going into philosophy, ethics would be a no-brainer. The study of ethics often involves what we should do, and what it would be best to do. With this issue, more questions about what we know is good, and what is bad emerge. Ethicists attempt to answer questions such are “What makes an action or a person good?”, “How can we know what is right and what makes an action right?”, and “Is ephemerality objective or subjective?” Metaethics is a general subject, along with normative ethics, and applied ethics. Metaethics inspects our ethical foundation and what they mean as a whole. Most questions concerning metaethics tends to lean more toward issues having to do with universal truths such as the will of God, and reasons in ethical judgement, and ethical terms all within themselves. Normative ethics is more practical. In this subject of study, ethicists arrive at standards that tell from right and from wrong. This may include expressing good habits that we should get into, obligations we should follow, and the aftereffect of our behavior to others. Lastly, applied ethics involves inspecting controversial issues, such as abortion,