Philosopher Immanuel Kant: Categorical Imperative In Ethics

Decent Essays
German philosopher Immanuel Kant has explicated a universal moral law known as categorical imperative in ethics. A categorical imperative is an unconditional moral law that has no affiliation with the outcome of an action. Hence, it is the opposite view of utilitarianism, or in other words, opposite view to teleological ethical theory. It has often been argued that business companies should follow the moral relativism rather than follow the moral universalism. Moral universalism has some close ties with deontological ethical theory. My aim of this paper is to show that deontological ethical theory is compatible with moral universalism, hence, can be regarded as the unique model in business

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Kant supports the categorical imperative with three different rules, all of which convince me that we have moral duties to ourselves because these rules are in a sense applicable to everyday life. The three rules include the universal law, treat humans as ends in themselves, and act as if you live in the Kingdom of ends. Universal law is discussed first where Kant states, “There is only one categorical imperative. It is an act only according to that maxim by which you can at the same time…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Many ethical theories require the individual to take a hard look inside and question the decisions that they are making to ensure that their decisions are matching their code of ethics that they want to or are attempting to live by. Neither, Ethical Egoism and Emmanuel Kant’s theory of the Categorical Imperative are exceptions to this. Although both of these ethical codes fit under the same umbrella of looking inward at an individuals own personal decisions, they also have some very important differences. This essay, looks at both of these codes and compares as well as contrasts them and then gives a final decision as to which one, with the opinion of the author, is better.…

    • 116 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant's Ethical Theory

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Kantianism Kantianism is an ethical theory that states that along as the action was in the good will nature, it would be deem as ethical. Kant proposed a categorical imperative with two formulations. The first formulation is act base on moral rules that can be universal moral laws. That means if the action is deem as good, everyone could do that action. The second formulation is treating yourself and others as ends, never as treat them as means to an end.…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To begin with, when there is any controversial issue, it is important to take perspectives from the scholars of the past, and to learn about what they have to offer. For obvious reasons, it isn 't possible to get their opinions on the specific issues. But it is possible to use their doctrines that they wrote about and apply them to the real world scenarios in question. The conflict that recently caught the media’s attention is about CEO Martin Shkreli. To be more specific the questions: “is what he is doing fair?…

    • 1434 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Kant’s categorical imperative commands consistent moral rules across diverse circumstances, providing the most logically consistent, although occasionally counterintuitive, basis for morality. To understand Kant’s categorical imperative, one must first understand his other ideas, particularly the hypothetical imperative and the rationality of man. Kant describes an imperative as an action that helps fulfill one’s will. Hypothetical imperatives depend on a hypothetical will that one might have. In Kant’s formulation, any rational actor who wills outcomes must follow a hypothetical imperative, if applicable, because it is the rational expression of their will.…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Immanuel Kant is remembered as the eighteenth century German philosopher who founded critical philosophy. He defined categorical imperative as the absolute or unconditional law that applies to all agents, the claim that does not depend on ulterior motives. The categorical imperative is not a command on people on what they should do or not. Kant formulated it to provide a way in which people would be able to evaluate their actions, measuring their morality and ethics. It is a procedure which any action can be evaluated to deem it morally relevant or not.…

    • 951 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Introduction Immanuel Kant is a very famous German philosophers and an opponent of utilitarianism. Categorical Imperatives is an ethical theory developed by him, to use as a guideline for morality. There are three main formulations in this concept, which are the formula of universal, the formula of humanity and the formula of autonomous. In this paper, I am going to use Kant’s ethical theory to find directions about the morality of abortion. Besides that, I will relate the findings of my case study to the flaws of Categorical Imperatives.…

    • 3077 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The major role and function of Kant’s categorical imperative is basically to define a mechanism and an approach through which an individual can judge and determine if his actions are moral or not (Paton, 1948). In applying his categorical imperative, Kant argues that the fundamental of moral actions or acts are that they are applied and used in a universal manner. In today’s rich cultural as well as diverse community, the need for universality has become highly problematic. The fundamental function and role of Kant’s categorical imperative is to act or behave as a moral principle through which many other moral principles can be tested as well as measured.…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    This is made clear when viewed from the ethical perspective of Immanuel Kant. Kant viewed morality through categorical imperatives, or commands that must be followed. For Kant, these rules are derived in reason and exist objectively and each person is bound by them. The first formulation of the categorical imperative is the universalizability principle, which states, “Act only in accordance with that maxim through which you can at the same time will that it become a universal law.”…

    • 1220 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A categorical imperative is an unconditional moral obligation that is binding in all circumstances and is not dependent on a person’s inclination. It provides us with a way to evaluate whether an action is moral or not. There are three formulations to test a categorical imperative: the Formula of Universal Law (FUL), the Formula of the Law of Nature (FLN), and the Formula of Humanity as an End. The first formulation tests to see if a universalized maxim contradicts itself, and thus, cannot be universalized as a basis of action without causing confusion. The second formulation asks if an individual would choose to live in a world where the universalized maxim is followed at all times.…

    • 1363 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This class, Ethics, has shown me many different moral theories that has opened my eyes in many ways; however, I will make a case that shows Kant provides us with the superior moral theory. There could be numerous ways to prove that Kant provides us with this, but I will explain the three reasons why I believe it. First of all, the categorical imperative—Universal Law—gives straightforward rules that everyone can apply and use in their daily lives. Secondly, the other categorical imperative—The Formula of Humanity—aspires to everyone being treated equally and correctly. Lastly, Kant’s moral theory is based on the intention of the action, not the consequences that arise from it.…

    • 1381 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moreover, as long as the moral law does not depend on our desires, it consists of what is called ‘categorical imperatives’ in Kant’s philosophical works (Gakuran…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Before I go on explaining what Kant meant by claiming that humanity must be valued as an “end in itself”; we have to go through his other claims as well to comprehend what he means by this. We all know that the only thing that matters is apparently our “good will” to be a nice person. And that “good will” should be without any incentives which Kant declares it as “moral”; and all this unconditional incitement he refers to as “priori”. But we have hardly seen any examples where actions have been taken without any motive and that is why categorical imperatives must therefore be derived as priori. According to categorical imperative in terms of the will of a rational person it means that you should treat other people like the way you want to be…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are subsets of actions and qualities that allow for use to live a good life in a Kantian view. These actions and qualities are defined by philosopher Immanuel Kant and solidified with the creation of what we know as the Categorical Imperative, which is the guiding principle for all our actions. This imperative is based on the premise of whether or not we would like your view/action or maxim to be blown up and imposed on a global scale. With this imperative, Kant provides a foundation for our moral compass. What we do must always fit within this imperative so that we can become a virtuous being and in turn become happy.…

    • 1460 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Immanuel Kant, a German philosopher, held a deontological approach that many use today as the basis of their ethical theory. His philosophy is similar to the Ten Commandments where it is your duty to do what is morally right regardless of the consequences. “Others cannot impose morality and moral obligations on us; we are the only ones who impose such obligations on ourselves. If we are moral, we impose a certain way of acting upon ourselves because we understand what it means to be a moral being” (DeGeorge 63). In order to appreciate his contribution to business ethics, we should first look at Kant’s life and his moral vision.…

    • 1152 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays