Freedom is the outcome of what the authors’ hoped for the revolutionary war. The author, Phillis Wheatley became a slave as a child fortunately was educated by her masters enabling her to write. In her poem to the Earl of Dartmouth, 1772, who is King George’s Secretary of State , Wheatley reveals her feelings of sadness being taken away from her parents at an early age, undergoing a relentless journey to become a slave, and it’s oppression on her life. The document is a plea asking the Earl of Dartmouth for a favor which is to granted the freedom amongst all blacks who reside in the colonies and in return the happiness he will receive from God in granting freedom. Two years later, Wheatley composes a Letter to the Reverend Samson Occom, which a document questioning the integrity of Christian ministers who maintain a double standard by preaching “how natural rights are the rights all humans should enjoy regardless
…show more content…
Hayes cites the meaning of the written word and the actions of man who do not discern this principle when he states,
“Liberty and Freedom, is an innate principle which is unmovably placed in the human Species; and to see a man aspire after it, is not Enigmatical, seeing acts now ways incompatible with Nature; consequently, he that he would infringe upon a man’s liberty may reasonably Expect to meet opposition, …”
Hayes uses forceful words in the document that laws need to abide by providing the very principles to which they outline in the law. Hayes verifies the struggle for man to comprehend the clear meaning of the written word they have laid out creating oppression and indicates the outcome of the document is the natural rights of all men which is the outcome of what he would forsee from the Revolutionary
Hayes cites the meaning of the written word and the actions of man who do not discern this principle when he states,
“Liberty and Freedom, is an innate principle which is unmovably placed in the human Species; and to see a man aspire after it, is not Enigmatical, seeing acts now ways incompatible with Nature; consequently, he that he would infringe upon a man’s liberty may reasonably Expect to meet opposition, …”
Hayes uses forceful words in the document that laws need to abide by providing the very principles to which they outline in the law. Hayes verifies the struggle for man to comprehend the clear meaning of the written word they have laid out creating oppression and indicates the outcome of the document is the natural rights of all men which is the outcome of what he would forsee from the Revolutionary