Philip The Great Tactics

Decent Essays
Philip II was a Macedonian king who ended up ruling over much of Greece through war and words( he was able to take over thermopylae through negotiation and made friends with many politicians of the small cities of Greece). He ruled over his empire until he was assassinated in 336 BCE and his son, Alexander the great would take over his empire, further adding and producing one of the biggest land empires ever.
But none of that couldn’t have happened if it wasn’t for King Philip whose tactics in war and politics took over one of the strongest empires of their time. Cementing him as one of the best leaders of his era.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Externally to Athens, Macedonia in northern Greece massively increased its military capabilities under the reign of Phillip II during the middle of the third century BC, coinciding with the escalation of Athens’ difficulties. Phillip’s son, Alexander the Great, oversaw the end of Athenian democracy. Conclusion Democracy alone does not guarantee good governance, and the power to influence the form of government does not always lie entirely within. Athens’ democracy in the end clearly demonstrated these realities.…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Alexander The Great Dbq

    • 266 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Alexander the Great: r.336-323 BC. Commander: 11 years of war, he never lost. He was from Macedonia, and was the most popular conquerer of all time. He was the son of the Macedonian king Philip the second. Macedonia, which was located in the northern edge of Greece, tried to incorporate the Greek culture.…

    • 266 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    But besides his brilliant leadership in battle, Plutarch writes of an unselfish side to Alexander where he gives away his riches to his companions, and of having bronze statues made for fallen soldiers after a battle. (page 4) This portrays Alexander as, not only an effective leader, but one that is almost flawless. Although there are those that disagree, Plutarch’s version of Alexander most definitely deserves to be called Alexander the Great.…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    King Philip conquered Greek city-states and planned to fight the strongest empire, the Persian Empire. At age 20 his father King Philip was tragically assassinated, which left him to take the rule and finish what his father started. The Persian Empire was the strongest in the world, which gave Alexander the motivation to fight. He pushed through Persian controlled land, across Asia…

    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander the Great is known as the King of Macedonia and conqueror of the Persian Empire. One of the writers of Alexander, Plutarch was ethnically Greek, but a citizen of Rome. The author takes famous Greek characters and compares them to Roman characters in his biographies; he has created the romantic picture of Alexander and used the story of Alexander to exemplify what is good leadership, and he does emphasize certain values that would be consider good qualities found in a leader, and the outcome of the use of such qualities. Being biased towards the Greeks, Plutarch successfully made his readers to believe that Alexander is a perfect model of leader by emphasizing maturity (insight) and ambition (courage) of Alexander, and by distorting…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander The Great DBQ

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Alexander was nothing short of an astounding leader. He led his army from Macedonia to Asia, founding many towns and conquering many battles (Document A), and as shown in Document E, the chart shows how great of a leader Alexander was, and how impactful he was throughout his leadership position. It also shows how even hundreds of years after his death, people still took inspiration and honored him for the things he accomplished. To sum up, Alexander was such a spectacular leader, that we remember him today mostly for the fact of his impeccable leadership skills. In addition to this, at the age of 20, Alexander's father passed away and the kingdom was passed down to him.…

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Alexander the Great, born as Alexander III of Macedon, was a King of Macedon who was known as one of the most brilliant military generals in history. He created a vast empire stretching throughout Europe and Asia. He lived from 356-325 B.C.E., and during that short time, was able to create a nearly unstoppable military force that never lost a battle while Alexander was alive. The son of Phillip II, he was able to continue his father’s mission to make Macedon into a powerful military and economic force. (Walbank, 2016)…

    • 1405 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After Pizarro had been murdered, a new king of Spain rose, Charles V’s son, Philip II. King Philip was not a bad leader, he in fact was nicknamed ‘the prudent’. However, Philip had done several things that dramatically affected the kingdom of Spain after his passing. Charles passed on many kingdoms to his don, including Milan, Naples, Sicily, and the Netherlands. With all these empires to look after, Philip had a surprising distaste for war.…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander The Great Dbq

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Alexander of Macedon: A Great Leader Being the first person to conquer the Egyptian, Greek, and Persian empires in just over a decade was no walk in the park, and neither was integrating a culture into all of those empires nor attempting to unite them all. Alexander of Macedon was this man: he conquered the greatest empires, spread the Greek influence, and lead in a unique way with his inspiring character that he is famous for. Although he was not the ideal leader such as Plato’s idea of a philosopher-king, he was an ethical man who wanted his people content. His well-known title, “Alexander the Great,” was very appropriate for him: his fine character and social goals, his unique political leadership and strategic conquering, and his economic…

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander The Great Dbq

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Once Alexander III of Macedonia’s father died, he inherited his throne and took over his empire at the age of twenty. Following in his father’s footsteps, he controlled a vast area of land, from Greece to Egypt extending to the Hindu Kush Mountains. Alexander did conquer over 3,000 miles of land, which is absurd, but his ruthless and sadistic manner doesn’t deserve the honoring title of “great”. Alexander was so power hungry, that his actions became deadly. He would pilfer every town and eradicate any obstacle in his quest for victory.…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Augustus Caesar was born on September 23, 63BC. He grew in a town called velitrae which is about 25 miles away from Rome. His Feather was a senator; He passed when Augustus was four. Augustus was adopted by His Uncle Julius Caesar. The rise of the Roman empire suggest that Augustus Caesar had a very good leadership skill because before the arrival of Augustus Rome Republic was not in a great health.…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    What if Alexander the Great did not die so young? Their are many questions that can be asked. In his short life he had one of the biggest empires in his time, he was the main power in Europe and he had taken over a lot of places and little towns. Alexander was a very known leader; he had the most power in Europe. Alexander the Great could have done a lot more good affects to the world than he already did, or he could have been a negative impact to the world.…

    • 2484 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander the Great was a significant historical figure who was as great a commander as his name suggests. Whether it be his two million square miles of conquered land, or his contribution to science through his expeditions, he certainly was one of the most important people of his time. In fact, Alexander the Great had such a lasting effect, the era after him was named “The Hellenistic Period”, from Hellas, which is the word for Greece. Alexander the Great was a fearsome figure of the ancient times, who had conquered Egypt, Central Asia, and had even beat Persia’s army. Historical evidence suggests that Darius III, the then king of Persia, had set the battlefield to his favor.…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander the Great was very important in Western Civilization, he conquered more land than any other king in this time. His reign as the King of Macedonia was important because he was able to lay down the foundations for the Hellenistic era. Alexander was the son of Phillip of Macedonia and king of Macedonia. His father, who had died wanted revenge on Persia and Alexander continued with his father’s plan to seek revenge against the Persians. Alexander on the other hand wanted total conquest, he had a dream of one world.…

    • 460 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Yvonne Mascorro AC0617108 Assignment 2 HS150 World Civilization I “Describe the conquests of Alexander the great and analyze the legacy of his empire”. In just twelve years, Alexander the Great conquered many territories, and took control of lands from west of the Nile to east of the Indus. Alexander took control over Syria, Palestine, Egypt, most of the Middle East, and many more. Alexander was one of the eight children of Philip II.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays