I will agree with the judge’s decision. The situation in which the pharmacist was, present ethical challenge. He believes that filling the prescription will hurt his personal value, but at the same time refusing to transfer the prescription could also harm the woman. If we refer to the Utilitarian approach, which is based on the greatest outcome and the least harm (Doherty and Purtilo, Pg.92), I think the pharmacist should present another alternative to the woman so that she can have her prescription fill. This will result the greatest outcome, because education is the “key”. She might become a doctor and take care of many
I will agree with the judge’s decision. The situation in which the pharmacist was, present ethical challenge. He believes that filling the prescription will hurt his personal value, but at the same time refusing to transfer the prescription could also harm the woman. If we refer to the Utilitarian approach, which is based on the greatest outcome and the least harm (Doherty and Purtilo, Pg.92), I think the pharmacist should present another alternative to the woman so that she can have her prescription fill. This will result the greatest outcome, because education is the “key”. She might become a doctor and take care of many