Phaedo Vs Socrates

Great Essays
Throughout, philosophy has been challenged by various intellectuals and philosophers who argued about life, specifically on the origin of the universe. They each had their own ideas and personal beliefs and stuck with it even if their counterparts were against them. Each had their own perspective of cognizance but all got to the same question. What are is the origin of the universe? Where does everything come from? Why is what is? They all try to answer these questions and it formulates still opinions and made the world what it is today. For example, Plato and Aristotle were two philosophers had the similar ideas but different but they concepts of the idea. without hesitation acknowledged by all his piers.

One of Platos most famous passages
…show more content…
Not even the parents or family of these people claim Socrates is a corrupting influenc
In Platos most important passages of many, the phaedo, I Echecrates encourages Phaedo , who is from of Elis, explain the story of Socrates’ death. Socrates had been fated to commit suicide by drinking hemlock as poison and before that he requested that he spend time with his fellow philosophers and companions of his long life. Phaedo states that among many friends were were Crito and two Pythagorean philosophers, Simmias and Cebes.
Socrates says to to his friends that" a true philosopher should look forward to death. "The purpose of the philosophical life is to free the soul from the needs of the body. Since the moment of death is the final separation of soul and body, a philosopher should see it as the realization of his aim. Unlike the body, the soul is immortal, so it will survive death." For Socrates had four argument a to prove that the soul
…show more content…
But Socrates explains to Simmias and Cebe that it's ok to be against is beliefs. Simmias supports his opposition while talking about methodology. He is against Socrates third argument, he argument of affinity. Simmias claims that "certainty is either impossible or difficult it, would show a weak spirit not to make a compete investigation. If at the end of this investigation one fails to find the truth ,one should adopt the best theory and cling to it like a raft either until one dies or comes upon something sturdier. For one might put forth a similar argument which claims that soul is like handing and be body is open a lyre and its strings." We really do suppose the soul is something of this kind, that is like a harmony or proper mixture of bodily elements like the hot and cold or dry and

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Abdulkabir Adejumo Professor Escalante PHILO 1301 11/2/2017 Response Paper 1 “Do We Survive Death?” In this interesting chapter, James Rachels starts by uncovering the philosophy of Socrates about the immortal soul. At that point, he utilizes the scientific argument to conflict with Socrates' conclusion about the presence of the soul as a piece of the human body.…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. In David Foster Wallace’s 2005 Commencement Speech “This is Water,” he talks about a default setting, which is something people do automatically. It is the concept of going through life without actually considering what is going on around you.…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Analysis of Plato’s Dialogue: Meno and Phaedo Introduction Plato wrote almost thirty dialogue, and Socrates is the major character in most of them. Platonic dialogue is a genre involving other texts such as Xenophon’s hiero and Plato’s law, in which Socrates, a wise man leads the dialogues those against each dialogues is Socrates who attempt to find out more about the understanding of other person concerning moral issues Meno In this Plato’s dialogue, the Socrates is faced with some very persuasive arguments with Meno, his another accuser. This dialogue’s main theme consists of the vivid explanation of real virtue by the Socrates utilizing brilliant epistemology.…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates’ argument at the end of Apology is that death is a blessing in one of two ways. It is either a “state of nothingness” or it is a “migration of the soul.” If death is comprised of nothingness, then it should be looked forward to because it would be a peaceful and restful sleep. On the other hand, if death is a migration of his soul, then Socrates would be able to be in the presence of the great people that have died before him, so he would be able to enjoy the afterlife surrounded by great figures that he could question regarding their wisdom. Socrates’ argument that death is a “state of nothingness” is self-contradictory because something cannot become nothing if it was once something, so his argument that death would comprise…

    • 193 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Socrates argument on why we should not be afraid of death is broken down into four different arguments. All four of the arguments are based on…

    • 1540 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Philosophy is important subject that impacts our history and has been wonderful tool towards many eras throughout time. Philosophy allows people to find out their true self, comprehend their living on Earth, and recognize the bonds we have with other people. Many philosophers took on these tasks and put their valuable information towards their society resulting them to documented in libraries or other resources that are preserved for future scholars. Philosophers found it challenging to get their points across their societies where they encounter conflict with political and religious groups because their statements may discriminate authority and laws. One famous philosopher who has been in this scenario that is classical Greek philosopher, Socrates where he…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Socrates Vs Crito

    • 155 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Crito is afraid of the people’s opinion pertaining to his not letting Socrates free when he had the chance. His main concern is that they will say that he was paid off to let Socrates stay and be killed. Socrates declares that the opinions of those who simply do not understand do not matter when it comes to making a critical decision such as the one at hand. Then, without worrying about the Athenian’s sentiments, he compares the good that might come out of the situation and the bad: between making an escape and staying to die. Socrates goes on to say that if he disobeys the laws under which he has been placed and abided by for his whole life, he will be forced into a meaningless existence, being an enemy.…

    • 155 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates Downfall

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Part of the evidence that was presented against Socrates was that he was corrupting the youth of Athens with his false doctrines. Socrates was also charged with encouraging evil actions like attempting to destabilize society. His constant battles with high ranking officials led to his demise as they were afraid that he would expose them. These officials were using their status for personal gain and Socrates was out on a mission to reveal their true intentions. His enemies, however, used his thirst for wisdom against him and proclaimed that he was trying to seek the intentions of the gods which is forbidden in their beliefs.…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thrasymachus Vs Socrates

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In the reading, The Republic, by Plato, Thrasymachus states what his own definition of justice is. His definition of justice is, “what is advantageous for the stronger”. What Thrasymachus means by this is that it is just forever whatever the ruling party must do to make sure that things are in their best interest. It is just for the ruling party to act in their own advantage. If a party is democratic, they will make laws that are in the best interests of democrats, if the party is tyrannical, they will make laws that are in the best interest of them.…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Unit 3 - Synopsis of Reading "Socrates: A Life Examined", Pgs 61-91 In chapter 3 of Socrates: A Life Examined, author Luis E. Navia introduces us to a second Socratic testimony written by another one of Socrates’ contemporaries, Xenophon. Within this chapter we discuss some major bibliographical details of Xenophon and his involvement with Socrates. As well as his most important Socratic works, their significance with the Socratic problem, and their differences with writings of other contemporaries, such as Aristophanes. Most importantly, Xenophon’s Socratic contribution helps shed light on the reason why Socrates seemed to choose death over anything else.…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    For when a man dies, it is merely the body (the moral part) that dies, while the indestructible, deathless soul remains immortal. True, for Aristotle, the soul cannot be immortal. Yet, he has not lost the ability to distinguish between the soul and the body, by claiming the soul cannot exist without the body. The soul and the body are yet distinguishable as form and actuality, and as matter and potentiality (respectively). What Aristotle offers us that is different, is a clearer understanding of soul and body as a…

    • 1885 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates Soul Analysis

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This section of “Plato’s Republic” demonstrates key ideas of the soul from Socrates view point. From the start of this section Socrates introduces his ideas to Glaucon. Socrates believed that cities have three attributes. He goes on to explain that since the attributes of a city come from the people living within, the soul must also be split into three attributes. Socrates attempts to break down the soul into three different categories; the part of the soul that learns or thinks (rational), the part of the soul that desires pleasure, and the part of the soul that is spirit.…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Within every person, there is an immortal soul. Immortal meaning that after death the soul continues to live on. During the paper, I will explain Plato’s view towards the immortality of the soul, which argument of Plato’s is the strongest to defending his claim, then I will talk about three arguments as to why I believe there is an immortal soul within each human being. Finally, I will look back at Plato’s strongest argument from the first section and give my personal take on his belief as to why we have an immortal soul.…

    • 1561 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Socrates must be punished, there is no other way to save the Athenian way of life, for he praises the Lacedaemonians, our sworn enemy in these dark times.” Demetrius may be hot headed and not the most reasonable character, but he does have a point. Socrates praises those Oligarchic Spartans, and undermines our Athenian Democracy.…

    • 1047 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Plato’s Gorgias, Socrates and Callicles engage in a debate about what it means to be happy and to live a flourishing life. According to Callicles, a person is happy and flourishing when he or she is living as ambitiously as he or she possibly can. Living the good life includes chasing one satisfaction after another and having a constant influx of pleasure. In contrast, Socrates emphasizes on the idea of eudaimonia, according to which a happy and flourishing person is one that lives an orderly life, in which the person maintains discipline and control over oneself.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays