Socrates Theory Of Biocentrism In Phaedo

Superior Essays
In the Phaedo, Socrates argues that practicing philosophy is practicing for death. In the paper that follows, I will explain why Socrates argues that philosophy is to learning to die based on the theory of anamnesis and how this connects with the present day theory of biocentrism where the soul takes a central part in understanding the universe. First, I will detail the theory of anamnesis in the Meno. Then, I will show how based on the theory that philosophy is learning to die as outlined in the Phaedo. Finally, I will connect the theory of anamnesis and the theory of philosophy as preparing for death to biocentrism in the twenty-first century.
In one of the most famous paradoxes, Meno asks Socrates, “Why, on what lines will you look, Socrates,
…show more content…
The first and second premises that death exists and the body and soul are separate is acknowledged in biocentrism. Essentially, biocentrism argues that the body is composed of living tissue and cells while the mind is our perception. “Without perception, there is in effect no reality. Nothing has existence unless you, I, or some living creature perceives it, and how it is perceived further influences that reality. (“A New Theory of the Universe”). However, a new theory in biocentrism has emerged arguing death does not really exist because there are an infinite number of universes, and all possible universes exist simultaneously, regardless of what happens in any of them. Although individual organisms, the body, will die, the mind lives on in an alternate universe. This is explained by conservation of energy as energy can neither be created nor destroyed and the mind is considered energy so it has always existed and can never be …show more content…
Similarly, in the Phaedo abstract truths can only be understood by the soul. For example, one of the core principles of biocentrism as outlined by Dr. Lanza states time does not have a real existence outside of our own human perception. “It is the process by which we perceive changes in the universe and space, like time, is not an object or a thing. Space is another form of our animal understanding and does not have an independent reality. We carry space and time around with us like turtles with shells. Thus, there is no absolute self-existing matrix in which physical events occur independent of life.” (“A New Theory of the Universe”). Since the role of the philosopher is to seek truth and truth can only come from the soul, biocentrism relies on the soul for the truth as well.
In conclusion, the points that are argued throughout the Phaedo and the Meno are used to prove the concept of the soul and that philosophy is learning how to die. I have offered an reconstruction for the theory of anamnesis and the philosopher’s duty of preparing for death and connected it with the present day theory of biocentrism where the soul takes a central part in understanding the

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    This belief in philosophy that the mind, soul, or conscious is independent from the body is referred to as Cartesian dualism; in other words, if the body dies the mind does not. Trying to distinct the mind from the body has been a topic in philosophy since Rene Descartes, one of the most influential founders. In one of Descartes first essays, the ‘Second Meditation: Of the Human Mind’, he wrote about how he believed that the mind and the body were two separate entities and self is distinct from the body. On the other hand, there are plenty of respected philosophers that believe Descartes’s look on our mind and body is wrong; these people call themselves Anti-Cartesians. Sir Peter Strawson, a very well-known Anti-Cartesian stated, the mind is…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the two texts that we read in class, Plato, Phaedo, and Lucretius, Nature of Things, both Socrates and Lucretius try to reassure us that we should not be afraid of death. In Plato, Phaedo, Phaedo is telling the story of Socrates’s final hours from being their first hand. In Lucretius, Nature of Things, Lucretius’s telling his view on religious issues and how he got to his view, poetic skills, and study on scientific phenomena. Both Socrates and Lucretius have different arguments on why we should not be afraid of death. Socrates and Lucretius would have their own responses to each other 's argument if they were to reply to each other.…

    • 1540 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First, as attempting a careful exploration of the issue raised by Epicurus using only the term “death” would be troublesome, for the term is ambiguous, I wish to differentiate three concepts from one another, that of dying, death and being dead. This will allow us to better understand Epicurus’ view about death in the most logically fluid way, while also enabling us to become more attuned to the equivocal usage of “death”, which often exemplifies rhetorically convincing ways of implying the falsity of Epicurus’ view. Dying, we may say, is the process whereby a thing loses life, whereas death is the time at which the process of dying ends. Both dying and death should be carefully distinguished with the state of being dead, which is a sort of tertiary state in one’s history, succeeding life . Secondly, I will follow custom and assume that one’s death results in permanent annihilation.…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates’ Success in Answering Meno’s Paradox Introduction In the dialogue Meno, Socrates and Meno start by attempting to find what virtue is, but are unsuccessful. They then dig into a more generalized question of how to find what any thing or idea is when one does not know what it is they are looking for. This is Meno 's Paradox. Socrates attempts to solve this paradox through the theory of recollection which states that the human soul is immortal and has knowledge of everything.…

    • 1174 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The body, while seemingly clearly definable and understandable, is a concept that humans have struggled to define and understand for much of history. Social conceptions of the mind of spirit shaped philosophers’ understandings of the relationship between the mind and body, as well as attitudes toward the body. In his essay “The Concept of the Body,” Eliot Deutsch presents readers with four popular modes of conceiving of the body. These models, popularized at different points throughout history, are the prison, the temple, the machine, and the instrument. Through reading Plato’s dialogue Phaedo, one gains perspective on Socrates’ conception of the body, as a prison.…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the Republic, Plato introduces many of his viewpoints and ideals through arguments. Some examples of what he introduces are what defines a city, principles of specialization, the tripartite soul and the sun, the line and the cave. In this paper, we are going to focus on the tripartite soul argument and the nature of justice. The tripartite soul argument states that a human soul is divided into three distinct parts that all want to achieve different goals. The soul, according to Plato, is composed of a rational, a spirited, and an appetitive factor.…

    • 1330 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The subject of philosophy is a study that can be viewed in many different ways. Some ways vary in extremes from one another, but they all wish to pursue the same thing; the understanding of knowledge and human excellence. One of the most popular arguments is the comparison of mind and body. Through this paper I will go in depth on the individuals theories and discoveries, then compare them using the ideas from Plato’s Phaedo and Descartes’ Meditations on First Philosophy. Both philosophers share the same ideas on dualism, and believe the body to be inferior to the mind and/or soul.…

    • 1568 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Phaedo is perhaps one of the most well-known dialogues written by the ancient Greek philosopher, Plato. This dialogue recounts Socrates’ final hours before his death as told by Phaedo of Elis, one of the philosophers present during that time. Along with him were Crito and two other Pythagorean philosophers, Simmias and Cebes. The main focus of this dialogue is on the subject of immortality and the soul, and whether or not the soul will survive death. Socrates provides four arguments in which he aims to prove that the soul is in fact immortal.…

    • 1169 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Unit 3 - Synopsis of Reading "Socrates: A Life Examined", Pgs 61-91 In chapter 3 of Socrates: A Life Examined, author Luis E. Navia introduces us to a second Socratic testimony written by another one of Socrates’ contemporaries, Xenophon. Within this chapter we discuss some major bibliographical details of Xenophon and his involvement with Socrates. As well as his most important Socratic works, their significance with the Socratic problem, and their differences with writings of other contemporaries, such as Aristophanes. Most importantly, Xenophon’s Socratic contribution helps shed light on the reason why Socrates seemed to choose death over anything else.…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Argument for the Immortality of the Soul When Socrates and Meno are halted in their argument by a paradox, Socrates proposes a new idea that will solve the paradox and continue their conversation. He states that the soul is immortal and it has learned everything in past lives. Thus, what men call learning is actually a process of recollection. I will first be giving context as to how this idea came into the dialogue with Meno. Next, I will explain how he puts the same idea forward in Phaedo and then noting the differences between the two dialogues.…

    • 1885 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The reading one has chosen to critically analyse is Gilbert Ryle’s Descartes ' Myth. Ryle is attempting here to undermine what he dubs ‘The Official Doctrine’, which is the idea that the generally accepted answer to the mind-body problem is that of Cartesian Dualism, as presented by Descartes in the 17th Century. Ryle refers to the general acceptance as ‘The Dogma of The Ghost Machine’, as the Cartesian theory makes humans out to be just a ghost (mind) controlling a machine (body). Ryle’s main point of argument is not to simply debunk some factors or issues in the language of the theory, but to prove it entirely false, not in its details but in the principle itself.…

    • 1069 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The dialogue between Socrates and Meno revolve around a fundamental issue: whether virtue can be taught. However, Socrates indicates that it is unfeasible to answer this question without knowing what virtue really is. He is interested in knowing the intrinsic nature of a virtue and what makes all instances of virtue, virtuous. In other words, the reason why something is a virtue. Although Meno produces his first faulty definition when he says, “If you want the virtue of man, it is easy to say that a man’s virtue consists of being able to manage public affairs…, and be submissive to her husband” (71e), it still does not answer Socrates’ question.…

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Socrates’s Argument on Death The topic of death frightens human beings for several reasons because of the speculation and the anxiety that surround death. Even though most people fear death, philosophers such as Socrates argue that there is no valid reason to fear death (Ahrensdorf 1995). According to 5Socrates, death is a blessing in the context of the relocation of the soul. Socrates avers that death is something that people should not fear and provide several arguments to validate his argument.…

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the Phaedo, Plato provides several arguments in an attempt to prove the immorality of the soul. In this essay, I will focus on his Final Argument, which describes the Forms as causes, subject to destruction or displacement when the particular undergoes some change. Next, I will show how Socrates applies these ideas to argue for the immortality of the soul. Finally, I will present a few reservations I have about the validity of this argument.…

    • 1675 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Essay On Brain Death

    • 1515 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The absence of life of an organism; permanent ending of vital processes in a cell or tissue; separation of the soul and the body; the cessation of breathing and the cessation of life, we have all heard one or more definitions of death. The real problem arises in assembling all the broken meanings of this feared state of our lives. Defining death is not merely an issue of describing this simple term; death has greater deep-rooted consequences in emergency rooms of hospitals where technology has enabled us to reflect on a new dimension of death – brain death as opposed to the cessation of cardiovascular function. In this essay, I aim to focus on how brain death successfully determines the occurrence of death and that such neurologically determined death is closely related to Pojman’s Whole Brain View (i.e.,…

    • 1515 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays