Turn Poverty into Equality In Peter Singer’s argument against poverty, he argues that more fortunate people should donate any money not needed for necessities, to countries encountering extreme poverty. The effects of this method could go either way when applied. However, the good that the can come out of this solution outweigh the possible negative effects, especially since one billion children are living in poverty, which is one in every two children (Global Issues). Imagine the news headlines: crime goes down, the world is finally equal in financial standings, people are now spending more time outside. Those wonderful headlines could become reality if this method was applied. Sure, there might be some issues with no competition or possible
…show more content…
Without the need for luxuries and unnecessary expenses, there will no longer be jobs for the people who made or provided these goods or services. This also leads to less competition between people and companies, because there are not enough products made by different companies to compete over. But, these problems can easily be fixed through some planning and thinking. More jobs can be created surrounding the help of those in need, such as construction, food production, and distribution centers. There will be more of a need for people like these now that everything has to be handed out to the countries who need it. Competition would go down, but there could still be some around the manufacturers of the necessity items and less competition could possibly lead to lower prices. Even those these problems can start out bad, they can easily be fixed in a matter of time. Overall, the Singer solution to poverty would be very beneficial to have enacted. It would help out so many people around the world who are struggling, not to mention the people who have too much. The solution would make the world run more smoothly and get the world on track to becoming powerful together. Those countries that need help absolutely cannot do it by themselves, and it would be a really good concept for the world to carry out. If you provide water and supplements to the country, it can grow and blossom into a beautiful country
Without the need for luxuries and unnecessary expenses, there will no longer be jobs for the people who made or provided these goods or services. This also leads to less competition between people and companies, because there are not enough products made by different companies to compete over. But, these problems can easily be fixed through some planning and thinking. More jobs can be created surrounding the help of those in need, such as construction, food production, and distribution centers. There will be more of a need for people like these now that everything has to be handed out to the countries who need it. Competition would go down, but there could still be some around the manufacturers of the necessity items and less competition could possibly lead to lower prices. Even those these problems can start out bad, they can easily be fixed in a matter of time. Overall, the Singer solution to poverty would be very beneficial to have enacted. It would help out so many people around the world who are struggling, not to mention the people who have too much. The solution would make the world run more smoothly and get the world on track to becoming powerful together. Those countries that need help absolutely cannot do it by themselves, and it would be a really good concept for the world to carry out. If you provide water and supplements to the country, it can grow and blossom into a beautiful country