Peter Singer Famine

Improved Essays
Show More
Peter Singer, author of Famine, Affluence, and Morality, is an Australian moral philosopher. He is a professor of bioethics at Princeton University and a Laureate Professor at the University of Melbourne. Singer’s main focus is applied ethics and ethical issues which he looks at from two different views. He looks at these ethical issues from a secular and utilitarian view. Singer is a utilitarian. He favors the majority. SInger thinks that actions are right if they benefit the majority.
In Famine, Affluence, and Morality, Singer focuses on the poverty in East Bengal. Singer understands that more than the Bengali’s are suffering, but he wants to focus on them because their rates are higher. Singer thinks that everyone from different parts of …show more content…
I don’t find this to be very accurate because an individual can work very little hours and be the happiest person on the earth. I also don’t find it fair for people to work full time just to supply for people that are facing famines and other horrible things. I agree with helping people, but you shouldn't have to wear yourself out just to help others. After wearing yourself out, you’re going to be just as miserable as the ones that need help. I also think SInger is wrong where he says individuals are just going to do what others around them are doing. I find fault in this because how others are spending their money isn’t going to influence you if you already know what you want to do with your money. For example, if a man is walking into the mall and happens to see a line of people giving to a charity he may keep walking. The young may keep walking because he knows that he’s there to buy the latest fashions. I also think that Bengal should dip into their funds if they have people that are homeless, instead of worrying about future generations. I think they should worry about the future once it arrives. If they keep worrying about the future then they are going to let their people die off. Then they won’t have anyone in the future. The Bengali’s never know what could happen in the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Peter Singer Poverty
    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Peter Singer Poverty

    In this essay “The Singer Solution to World Poverty” Peter Singer is trying to persuade the society that the world hunger and poverty will be solved if people from wealthy society donate the money that spend on their luxuries to the aid organization. He gives two controversies examples of Dora’s situation and Bob’s situation which help to strengthen his argument. From that examples it is also supports his arguments in favor of his altruistic position. On the other hand he also address the objections to his arguments which is “fair share” and “the limit of the donation.…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Philosophers Jan Narveson And Peter Singer: Moral Responsibility And Duty
    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Philosophers Jan Narveson And Peter Singer: Moral Responsibility And Duty

    He reasons that everyone on the planet does not have an equal entitlement on the resources of others, that we are bound to a greater duty to our family and circle, who have a greater right. By providing for and ensuring happiness to our immediate needs from all others that may claim to our resources, is, in fact, a more efficient means to achieve happiness. Singer counters that although pockets within these first world nations can experience poverty relative to others within their population, these developing nations face absolute poverty, where life is plagued by hardships including death, disease, squalid living conditions and overall despair. Where industrialized nations possess a prosperity and capacity to provide assistance to third world nations, Singer suggests that a donation of one-tenth of their wage would not only lessen the destitution of their fellow man but could be achieved without cost to their own particular well-being and wealth. As this act would maximize the utility or happiness for the greatest number of world citizens and therefore have an ethical obligation to do…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    Peter Singer's Moral Dilemmas: An Analysis
    • 348 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Peter Singer's Moral Dilemmas: An Analysis

    The moral dilemma shown here, is the same one that Singer believes occurs every time an American who already owns a TV chooses to go out and buy a new one. Instead of using this excess money to upgrade their television, they should be donating it to prevent the deaths of kids in need. Even though these two decision both have different factors to them, they both could lead to the same result. Except, in one scenario a kid dies by being sold to an organ peddler, and in the other a child dies of hunger on the street.…

    • 348 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Analysis Of Famine, Affluence And Morality By Peter Singer
    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Analysis Of Famine, Affluence And Morality By Peter Singer

    In this section I will outline Singer’s argument. Singer’s first premise states that any suffering stemming from poverty is morally wrong. This suffering can include suffering from not enough food, poor living conditions, or a lack of proper medical care. His second premise describes that it is our moral…

    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Famine, Affluence And Morality By Peter Singer
    • 2212 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Famine, Affluence And Morality By Peter Singer

    Everyday millions of people around the world suffer in circumstances, in which they could die from lack of proper care and resources. In Famine, Affluence, and Morality, Peter Singer acknowledges this issue facing humanity and argues for the moral obligation to give large amounts of money to those in need. Singer believes that all who are able should be giving up many, if not all of their luxuries to help give the less fortunate their necessities. I will begin by summarizing the argument that Singer dictates in his article and then explain my reasoning for believing his notions to be sound and valid.…

    • 2212 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    John Stuart Mill's 'Utilitarianism'
    • 1497 Words
    • 6 Pages

    John Stuart Mill's 'Utilitarianism'

    Singer sets the stage for his argument by his first premise, which he believes most would agree too, that human suffering and death due to a deficiency of food, shelter, and medical aide are bad (231). Secondly, he states that if it is in one’s power to prevent something bad from happening, without having to sacrifice anything of equal moral importance, we morally ought to do it. He implies that…

    • 1497 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Of Peter Singer's Famine, Affluence And Morality, And Lifeboat Ethics
    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Of Peter Singer's Famine, Affluence And Morality, And Lifeboat Ethics

    (Intro) Peter Singer’s “Famine, Affluence, and Morality” and Garrett Hardin’s “Lifeboat ethics” are contradictory philosophical works that examine whether scarce resources should be shared with the poor. Singer’s argument is that “suffering and death from lack of food, shelter and medical care are bad" (Singer, 1972); therefore all people become morally obligated to help the poor. While Hardin argues that ethics of a Lifeboat should be followed because there is a finite amount of resources available at our disposal (Hardin, 1974, pp.566). Both authors take extreme positions by providing opposing arguments on whether we should be involved in helping the famine or not. This essay will analyze the rational of both authors’ while trying…

    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Analysis Of Famine, Affluence, And Morality By Peter Singer
    • 1478 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Analysis Of Famine, Affluence, And Morality By Peter Singer

    In “Famine, Affluence, and Morality,” Peter Singer discusses the moral obligation of humans to prevent bad things from happening. In particular, Singer focuses on the prevention of the famine in East Bengal during November 1971 where many people were dying from poverty. Singer argues that since global poverty may be inhibited through charitable donations, then individual people ought to be morally obligated to donate what Singer defines as their surplus of money to charities that will aid impoverished nations. Singer writes his article in the format of a thought experiment, in which he presents a number of generally agreeable premises that lead up to his conclusion which is to donate as much money to charity as what Singer determines is reasonable.…

    • 1478 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Analysis Of Famine Affluence And Morality
    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Analysis Of Famine Affluence And Morality

    In his essay, “Famine, Affluence, and Morality”, Peter Singer begins with the assumption that famine should be eradicated, based upon the generally wide held principle that the suffering created by lack of food is bad. He then sets up the general basis for his argument which is: “if it is in our power to prevent something bad from happening, without thereby sacrificing anything of comparable importance, we ought, morally, to do it” (Singer 231). From this general idea, Singer outlines the reasons why it is a person’s moral duty to prevent famine and how a person should help alleviate famine, all of which can be backed by the theory of utilitarianism. Singer claims that a person has the duty morally to give in order to prevent something bad from occurring.…

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    John Arthur's Argument Analysis
    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages

    John Arthur's Argument Analysis

    Summary John Arthurs has a unique stance on world hunger and moral obligation and the way that we should handle these issues. He opens up his argument by analyzing one of Pete Singers rules “If it is in our power to prevent something bad from happening, without thereby sacrificing anything of comparable moral importance, we ought, morally, to do it. “(666) Arthur believes that rule of life is a flawed one. He counters this statement by giving a scenario using Singers moral rule. Arthur states “All of us could help others by giving away or allowing others to use our bodies.…

    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Peter Singer Analysis
    • 1509 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Peter Singer Analysis

    Bogging down the argument in the selfish aspects of the individual, who at most if they do work to combat global suffering is minimally affected detracts from the severity of the problem that is being addressed. What is important is the suffering the absolute poor face, and if the justification to help them is not helping them is murder, then what justification would exist? Singer’s justification still is not enough to truly compel most people into acting, and if the possibility of being a murderer is not enough then no other justification would be either, and any other would be even less compelling. Hence, it is better to assume Peter’s assertion is the case and convince more people to act. Or on a micro-level, is it not better to take Singer at face value and save lives, or at worst Singer be wrong and have still saved…

    • 1509 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Moral Obligation: The Case Against Singer By Peter Singer
    • 2138 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Moral Obligation: The Case Against Singer By Peter Singer

    Peter Singer ultimately believes that we are morally obligated to help those who need help and are suffering. He provides various arguments that support his belief that everyone should help the dying people of East Bengal. He starts off by assuming one thing, “suffering and death from lack of food, shelter, and medical care are bad.” This assumption serves as a foundation for his many claims since it provides a definition for what he considers bad. Furthermore, his first claim is that we are morally obligated to stop bad things from happening only if we do not have to sacrifice something of equal value.…

    • 2138 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism And Morality, By John Stuart Mill And Peter Singer
    • 1033 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Utilitarianism And Morality, By John Stuart Mill And Peter Singer

    In other words, the point of marginal utility is where happiness begins to plateau in regards to extraneous wealth. To Singer, this money would be much more appreciated by someone whose suffering could be ended, rather than someone whose happiness is unaffected by it. Furthermore, Singer argues that affluent societies should not send aid merely because they have the desire to do, but because they have a moral obligation to do…

    • 1033 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Garrett Hardin Lifeboat Ethics Summary
    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Garrett Hardin Lifeboat Ethics Summary

    In Garrett Hardin’s “Lifeboat Ethics: The Case Against Helping the Poor”, Hardin argues about “a world that must solve real and pressing problems of overpopulation, hunger and moral duty.” Hardin sets the stage by first giving his analysis on the structure of the world today by describing the earth as a lifeboat rather than a spaceship. He then dives into how population control, the tragedy of the commons and immigration are some of the main reasons for the problems we have today. Hardin argues that simply helping people and giving charitably will not solve these problems. Peter Singer, in “Famine, Affluence, and Morality” seemingly goes against Hardin by saying that “if it is in our power to prevent something bad from happening, without thereby…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Singer's Argument Analysis
    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Singer's Argument Analysis

    In this paper I will reconstruct Singer’s argument as well as argue why his argument is unsound. In Singer’s paper, Famine, Affluence and Morality, he argues that any kind of suffering from lack of food, healthcare and shelter is a bad thing. He further argues that if we have the ability to prevent something bad from happening, that it is our duty as moral beings to prevent suffering unless we have to sacrifice something of significant moral importance. In class we called it the prevent suffering principle. An example that Singer gives is of the prevent suffering principle is to imagine a young child drowning in a shallow pond.…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings