Peter Singer's Argument On Effective Altruism

Improved Essays
In this paper, I will attempt to explain Peter Singer’s position on “Effective Altruism. I will then argue that there is a problem with one of his claims. I will also give examples and statistics to back up my argument or objection to one of his claims. Once I am done giving my objection, I will then summarize everything in my paper and give my final take on Peter Singer’s view on Effective Altruism. At the end of the paper, the audience will be able to identify my views and see what I believe in.
Peter Singer’s first claim regarding effective altruism is that you don’t have to be a billionaire to make a difference in charities. So many people worry how much of a difference they can make if they are not rich or have a lot of money. A great example that Singer uses in his presentation is a researcher in philosophy from the University of Oxford. Toby Ord, the researcher had calculated that with the money he was most likely to earn in his career, that he could give enough to cure 80,000 people of blindness from developing countries. Toby Ord would still have enough left to live an adequate standard of living.
…show more content…
Peter Singer enjoys giving and he has giving money to charities since he was a graduate student. One of the examples Singer uses his is friend Holly Morgan. Holly Morgan had been dealing with depression and when she got involved with effective altruism, she felt better and was one the happiest people that Singer had known. Singer feels that effective altruism gives you that meaning and fulfillment. It enables you to have a solid basis for self-esteem on which you can feel your life was really worth living. This means that you will feel happy for giving and you also will live a better life. Effective altruism will enable people to bring the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people. More people will be effective and there will be more of a positive impact on the developing

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Peter Singer Poverty

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In this essay “The Singer Solution to World Poverty” Peter Singer is trying to persuade the society that the world hunger and poverty will be solved if people from wealthy society donate the money that spend on their luxuries to the aid organization. He gives two controversies examples of Dora’s situation and Bob’s situation which help to strengthen his argument. From that examples it is also supports his arguments in favor of his altruistic position. On the other hand he also address the objections to his arguments which is “fair share” and “the limit of the donation.…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What duty do we have to help those who might otherwise starve without our intervention? Is it our responsibility to help our fellow man in need or are we free to stand on the sidelines? Philosophers Jan Narveson and Peter Singer offer contrasting viewpoints on the moral obligations affluent nations have to aid and support the poor. Where Singer reasons that by having the privilege of living in nations of wealth, this benefit carries with it the moral obligation to help those around the world who are sentenced to live in absolute poverty, if only because of where fate had them born. In response, Narveson argues Singer is mistaken: our responsibility and duty first lies to our circle and we should never insist that others take the responsibility…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The moral dilemma shown here, is the same one that Singer believes occurs every time an American who already owns a TV chooses to go out and buy a new one. Instead of using this excess money to upgrade their television, they should be donating it to prevent the deaths of kids in need. Even though these two decision both have different factors to them, they both could lead to the same result. Except, in one scenario a kid dies by being sold to an organ peddler, and in the other a child dies of hunger on the street.…

    • 348 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Webster defines. ‘Altruism’ as an “unselfish regard for, or devotion to the welfare of others.” Leading an altruistic lifestyle is associated with happiness, well-being, a sense of worth, and perhaps, most importantly, has the potential to be contagious. In ‘The Good Person of Szechwan,’ while both Shui Ta and Shen Teh attempt to help others, their approaches and ultimately successes are very different. While money has the potential to create circumstances that promote goodness, the end result of a financial infusion is usually short-lived.…

    • 1440 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Angus Deaton’s main argument in Response to Effective Altruism is that it is extremely difficult to help the poor people of the world. Deaton also states that foreign aid and other charities are an ethical problem. Arguing against effective altruism, Deaton says that the proof of charity effectiveness is based on technical outfits which are inaccurate. The charity GiveWell is the Consumer Reports for altruists according to Deaton, which means GiveWell creates a minimum cost for saving a child’s life. Deaton states that is an illusion that lives can be bought like cars, since a price tag cannot be put on a life.…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For the point of this study we will be looking at the studies done in relation to gender influences. Most studies found that females portrayed more altruistic behaviours than males (Simmons & Emanuele, 2007). Many of the results have suggested that though females do portray altruistic behaviour more commonly, there was a suggestion on circumstances playing a part. One study in particular ( 2 )has suggested that if the price towards oneself is high when committing altruistic behaviour, women are more likely to do so, while men are less likely. However when the opposite is true, when the price is low women are less likely to participate in this behaviour while men are more likely to do so.…

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On September 11, 2001, The United States changed forever. On that morning four planes were hijacked and flown into three of the United States largest and important buildings. Two of the planes had flown into the Twin Towers, the stars of New York City. The other plane hit the Pentagon in Washington DC, with the last plane crashing into a field were the passengers did not allow the plane to get hijacked which was heading for The White House. The Twin Towers had around 17,000 people in them when the planes struck, those thousands of people were beginning their workday but instead had to begin fighting for their lives.…

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Everyday millions of people around the world suffer in circumstances, in which they could die from lack of proper care and resources. In Famine, Affluence, and Morality, Peter Singer acknowledges this issue facing humanity and argues for the moral obligation to give large amounts of money to those in need. Singer believes that all who are able should be giving up many, if not all of their luxuries to help give the less fortunate their necessities. I will begin by summarizing the argument that Singer dictates in his article and then explain my reasoning for believing his notions to be sound and valid.…

    • 2212 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    We are social creatures and altruism is at the core of who we are. A better life for anyone is a better life for everyone. As a society we can only move forward when everyone moves forward. As the famous proverb goes “A chain is only as strong as its weakest link.”…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In life we are faced with a series of “big questions”. These questions answer whether we are decently moral people. The ‘big question” we are going to tackle is ‘are we under an obligation to save lives?’ If so, what is required of us to be a morally decent person? In “The Gift” by Parker we learn that Zell Kravinsky would take a utilitarian approach to this question.…

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Singer advocates that an individual practice marginal utility, which is when the person giving reaches the same material level as the person who is receiving the charity (236). His claim for this follows that it would alleviate the…

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Effective Altruism

    • 1665 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In the book, The Most Good You Can Do: How Effective Altruism Is Changing Ideas About Living Ethically, by Peter Singer, the author introduces readers to a new movement called “Effective Altruism”. As stated in his book, effective altruism is “a philosophy and social movement which applies evidence and reason to working out the most effective ways to improve the world.” (Singer, 4-5) To be able to practice effective altruism, the book offers several ideas to become an effective altruist such as living modestly to give more, earning to give, giving organs, donating to the most effective charities, and by viewing everyone’s suffering as equal including animals. While many of these strategies are beneficial to the greater good, some may also present…

    • 1665 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Does that have any meaning, though, if the end result - people’s lives being saved - is the same? Like mentioned prior, some of the people in the world have no other option. Whether it is a morally correct thing for one to donate when considering their motives, is not something that would cross the minds of those who are living in extreme poverty where those around them are dying and they are simply waiting their turn. Singer states that philanthropists such as Bill Gates and Warren Buffet are donating large sums of money towards solutions to global poverty, not due to motivations of personal divine salvation, but rather more likely out of a sense of duty. So the motivations of those who donate should simply be to better the state of his fellow man, but as well as if there were a government mandated requirement to donate then that would remove the question of if it 's their personal motives or not out of the question…

    • 1149 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Peter Singer Argument

    • 1206 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The underlying goal of philosophy is to help humans seek the ultimate truth to the questions that orbit their knowledge for the meaning of existence. One question that many philosophers are challenging themselves to answer would be that of just how far individuals should go in order to provide relief for those who are suffering from poverty. After attaining a degree in bioethics, a professor by the name of Peter Singer recently ventured to provide the world with an answer to the question that had been protruding the minds of many philosophers. Singer claims, “The formula is simple: whatever money you’re spending on luxuries, not necessities, should be given away.” Although Singer’s argument proposes an idea that could be beneficial towards…

    • 1206 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper I will reconstruct Singer’s argument as well as argue why his argument is unsound. In Singer’s paper, Famine, Affluence and Morality, he argues that any kind of suffering from lack of food, healthcare and shelter is a bad thing. He further argues that if we have the ability to prevent something bad from happening, that it is our duty as moral beings to prevent suffering unless we have to sacrifice something of significant moral importance. In class we called it the prevent suffering principle. An example that Singer gives is of the prevent suffering principle is to imagine a young child drowning in a shallow pond.…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays