Peter Singer Animal Rights Analysis

Improved Essays
Any good life allows for equal opportunity. In the context of the Civil Rights Movement in the latter half of the 20th Century, the ability to participate, just as much as white men in politics, work, and social life, without discrimination, was one of the main goals of human rights organizations. When looking through the eyes of philosopher Peter Singer, equal opportunity is important when discussing animal rights and how to maintain the earth by ensuring the ethical treatment of all its inhabitants that have the capacity to feel emotion. The way humans affect each other and the world around them, as shown through these two movements, is important when considering what a good life is for everyone. My painting demonstrates the toll of inequality …show more content…
Singer acknowledges the similarities between the two when claiming, “From the very beginning of my writing on these issues, I have drawn parallels between racism, sexism, and speciesism... a dominant group develops an ideology that justifies treating outsiders in ways that are to its benefit. This ideology also disregards or discounts the interests of these outsiders…” (148). My art piece puts the effects of racism and speciesism on display. They human is on the outside of the jail cell with the giant wings stolen from the bird inside. It means to bring attention to the idea that the white man, or in theory just a powerful representation of a biased authority, takes away the only power of the people that are seeking equal rights and animals that need ethical treatment. Without the component of equality in a good life, oppression is a very serious threat. Even though these biases inhibit the actions of distinct groups, they all do it in the same way: they allow people to believe the interests of the dominant group are more valid than those of the people who are trying their best to speak up for what they need. This is certainly evident in both animal rights and the Civil Rights Movement. When racist and speciesist groups of people tried to use the fact that animals can’t talk and therefore it doesn’t matter what happens to them or that since African Americans aren’t able to pass the extremely unequal and unregulated literacy tests to be able to vote, they don’t deserve to be voting member of an supposedly equal society, all their causes are then invalidated by an ignorant patriarchy that is resistant to any change that doesn’t benefit them in any way. A good life is founded on equality without the biases of racism and speciesism that are perpetuated in everyday American

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Absolute equality has led to taking away one’s freedom to move and think properly, demonstrating the negative effects in a society with equality rather than freedom. Vonnegut shows readers the message that freedom is an essential within a…

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This society is one that claims to be perfect, it strives to be a utopia, and all of its residents naturally agree and conform to this society’s standards. No one has ever been disgruntled about this “perfect” tyranny, except for Equality. Equality is the only one to ever see something wrong with the society, the only one to question the leader’s decisions, and he was right to…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Peter Singer, an animal liberator, argues that animals should have rights because they have the ability to experience suffering. One of the scenes shows how a baby elephant is finding it difficult to sleep at night: the elephant was having a nightmare of how his mum was killed, which had become a trauma for the elephant. This shows that elephants have the memory of everything that happens to them, which can sometimes lead to suffering.…

    • 75 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the article “What’s Wrong with Animal Rights”, author Abby Hearne states that the current animal rights movement is “built upon a misconceived premise that rights were created to prevent us from unnecessary suffering.” This mixed with the misunderstanding of animal happiness and what it really means. This paper is written for people who are supporters of the current animal rights movement. The author Abby Hearne’s main argument in this essay is that our definition of animal rights is fundamentally wrong.…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Yes, equality in a society is a positive thing, in terms of race, religion, gender, nationality, etc. However, we are all meant to be unique, and have different areas in which we succeed. Equality in all terms of our basic life will cause the world to have a lack of diversity. In today's time, lawmakers are creating changes that provide equal rights for everyone, the author reminds us that if taken to a certain extent, it can prove to be dangerous. A world with everyone as equal may sound pleasing at first, but can eventually lead to grave repercussions for the…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In his essay, “Speciesism and the Equality of Animals,” Peter Singer argues that the standard for having a right to get equal consideration as others is the species’ “capacity for suffering and enjoyment” (205), and therefore, a species which satisfies the standard should be protected from speciesism. Speciesism is “a prejudice or attitude of bias toward the interests of members of one’s own species and against those of members of other species” (204). Singer states that many people’s voices arguing that intelligence cannot justify racism and sexism bring speciesism towards animals into…

    • 93 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The idea of having equal rights is strongly sought after in all cultures. “Harrison Bergeron” is a short story about an alternative future where all members of the dystopian society are physically and mentally handicapped in order to make every member equal. Similarly, in today’s society we try to force equality through the Affirmative Action Plan and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. While the establishment of equality is seen as beneficial to many members of society, it can sometimes lead to unintended consequences such as the lack of competition, decrease in motivation, and the loss of the initiative to work hard.…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Imagine life without depending on any animals. For some it may be easy for instance a vegetarian but hard for the meat lovers. Animals do much more than just feeding us. They can find cures for diseases like cancer and AIDS. In the essay “The Evil of Animal Rights,” there is a group of people who disagree with animal testing.…

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The animal rights movement declares that animals have the same right to life and protection from suffering, as well as any other creature that can feel pain. Doctor of Philosophy, Tom Regan, justifies animal rights from the standpoint of logic. In his article “The Radical Egalitarian Case for Animal Rights”, the author takes a firm stance on this issue and claims that almost all human relationships with animals have the exploitative nature. At the same time, animals have the right to meet the needs and the implementation of their natural purposes. Tom Regan 's argument can be formulated as follows non-human animals have an equal right to respect and treatment for them, which means that hurting them or using as a raw material or a kind of resource…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hesse G. Sambaan September 25, 2017 Comp II What’s wrong with the animal rights by Vicki Hearne Vicki Hearne thinks that there is more for animal satisfaction for happiness that is the personal achievement. Animals find happiness in their work that they do that you can call “talent”. She believes that animal right advocates got all it wrong, making some of the animals suffer and they are more concern of arguing than the animal’s happiness. The essay was persuasive, she uses her own knowledge as animal trainer and she proves that the only one who can really define the animal’s happiness is the owner. to clarify her own essays, she also uses her own animals, her experienced, and a lot of examples.…

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Peter Singer argues that all animals are equal and that it is not right to eat or kill animals. For the reason that animals are capable of feeling pain and pleasure, they matter and we should consider them as equals. I agree with Singers point of view as an utilitarian, we are morally obligated to make more pleasure than pain, we can’t validate killing and eating animals because they taste good. Singer states that not all humans are equal in a factual sense and that we all have different mental capabilities and different sets of morals.…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    During the 2004 Keynote Address for the Democratic National Convention, President Obama states “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness” (78). In agreement with President Obama, I can support the fact that all men are created equal. We are citizens of the United States and with that the responsibility is to support life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. But Americans have come across problems with inequality and injustice. For instance, if an employee speaks out about the company that they work for, then he/she could risk the possibility of losing their job and in today 's world it is almost impossible for one to live without a steady income.…

    • 1567 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, greater equality is something we must work towards as “greater equality makes societies stronger.” (Wilkinson, R. and Pickett, K., 2010) Equality or inequality affect every aspect of people's lives including but not limited to: economy, social mobility and education, society's trust, participation, and overall attitude, personal happiness, physical and mental health and crime rates. History shows unstable economies come…

    • 1281 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the major theories in philosophy is utilitarianism, which strives for producing the most amount of happiness. The utilitarian approach is based on the simple doctrine that if an action is ethical and it brings happiness to an individual or a group of people without causing pain, then it is acceptable. One of the main emphasis of utilitarianism is animal rights. It primarily focuses on the treatment of animals and how they should be treated more humanely. The paper will discuss utilitarian’s beliefs and whether they require people to stop eating animals and experimenting on them.…

    • 1122 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Deciding how to interact and improve the world through ethics and moral reasoning is an ongoing contentious debate that has lasted for thousands of years. Two of the largest moral theories to develop in the twentieth century, that try to deal with the world around us, is environmentalism and animal liberation. Environmentalism is best summarized as the moral principle that biotic communities and the relationships within those communities are of the utmost importance to preserve. Animal Liberation represents the belief that sentience of a being qualifies that individual for moral consideration. If Leopold’s maxim is followed as the standard for land ethicism and the “when” in his maxim is read as a necessary condition then animal liberation…

    • 1062 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays