Persuasive Speech: Why We Should Attack Carthage

Decent Essays
Hello my fellow Roman Senators, Enough is enough! Today we discuss the issue of attacking Carthage and whether to, or not to, destroy their city and take our pride back. This issue is one that has been talked about all over our land and throughout our people and needs to be addressed. I believe that we should attack and burn the city for many reasons including revenge for our people, it gets rid of all threat from them, and our pride is at stake. My first main point is, the army of Carthage almost destroyed us which makes us look very bad and weak. We need to attack them for revenge. We should all be humiliated by how close Hannibal and his army came to destroying us. We should do this for the pride of our country and the well-being of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The battle of Lake Trasimene was a major battle in the second Punic war which was led by Hannibal. The Carthaginians defeated the romans with the consul of Gaius Flaminius Hannibal Barca, was a Punic military commander from Carthage, known as one of the greatest military commanders in history during the Second Punic War (218-202 BCE). His father Hamilcar Barca was the leading Carthaginian commander during the First Punic War (241 BCE); which ended in defeat of the Carthaginians against the Romans in Sicily. Due to the defeat Hamiclar Barca devoted the rest of his life as well as Hannibal’s swearing on getting indestructible wrath against the Roman Empire in Spain, to improving Carthaginian battle skills in order to cease the Roman Empire.…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Brutus is a stoic man and he's also Caesar's best friend. Brutus thinks Caesar is ambitious so he slews him for Rome. He approaches the Romans with mob mentality because he doesn't want them to think that he killed Caesar for the throne. He did this because he values reason above emotion although, when he says, "Not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more," Brutus is showing us a comparison between his love of Caesar and his love of Rome by using these opposite words, less and more, What rhetorical appeals does the speaker use? He is using what is called "Antithesis" and "Epimone."…

    • 243 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Despite both Mark and Brutus gave persuasive speeches, Mark had more examples to contradict Brutus’s points, while Brutus based his speech off unknown future events. In Mark Antony’s speech he used the rhetorical device logos to explain his logic and stated, “I thrice presented him a kingly crown, Which he did thrice refuse: was this ambitious?” (Stanza 3). There is proof within the quote that Caesar was not ambitious because he did not accept the crown. Mark also adds a rhetorical question to emphasize the point he is making.…

    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Polybius Describes the Romans’ Worship of Their Ancestors 1. Polybius admired the Roman Republic a great deal, in fact, he believed the roman republic to be a perfect form of government. He believed the success of the Roman Republic was tied to the Romans’ principle mosmaiorum, “the code of elders”. One of the main features that sets apart the Romans from the other civilizations at the time, was their devotion to their ancestors. The Romans’ practice during funerals showcased their devotion and respect to their ancestors.…

    • 1140 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Caavs Persuasive Speech

    • 1850 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The draft is finally here! Congratulations to the Cleveland Cavs and their fans. The NBA felt so bad for LeBron leaving to take his talents to South Beach that the NBA decided to award number one pick for the 3rd time since that moment. You have the number one pick!!…

    • 1850 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Based on your opinions on what we’ve learned in this section, answer Cullen Murphy’s question: “Are We Rome?” I would agree with Cullen Murphy’s view of the state of the United States government. As the United States capital city Washington was once the center of the world quite like Rome was once the center of its world. There are arguments that Washington still is the as you would say capital of the world. However, I would disagree with that as the United States is no longer the sole super power of the world.…

    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With so many lives lost the amount of people to help protect the country fell greatly. This lack of people make it even easier for the already brutally superior Huns to overthrow the “almighty” Rome. If Rome had not been affected by such strong disasters and disease more soldiers would have been able to contribute to fighting the Huns. Rome could have lasted for a longer period of time if not for the political and economic corruption.…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Imagine losing a best friend and never saying goodbye. Imagine witnessing their last breath as they are brutally murdered. Imagine having to stand in front of a crowd trying to reason their death. In Shakespeare’s The Tragedy Julius Caesar, Mark Antony has to fill these dreadful shoes after witnessing the murder of his closest friend, Julius Caesar.…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Julius Caesar Spring Final There are several occurrences that prove the theory that words are more powerful than weapons. In the play Julius Caesar a guy by the name of Marc Antony convinces a whole crowd of people to revolt against their leader. In Germany Hitler did a similar thing, he turned the people to his radical side. They used persuasive speech and gave the people offers that caused them to be loyal to them.…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Act III, Scene 2 of The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Mark Antony turned a crowd of mourning citizens to an angry mob. Antony turned this crowd into an angry mob through multiple persuasive devices. Brutus and the other conspirators thought they were killing Caesar for the good of Rome, but Antony and other ideas. He wanted to discreetly show the crowd of Romans who the conspirators actually were to him, a group of murderers. In order to persuade the people to not have sympathy for the Conspirators, Antony showed them Caesar’s will, repetitively said the word “honorable”, and showed them Caesar’s body.…

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    *Walk out holding apple* * Take a bite of apple* Did you know you are 34.7% more likely to choke on an apple than any other fruit?…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After the assassination of Julius Caesar in 44 B.C., three men, M. Aemilius Lepidus, Mark Antony, and Octavian vied for the support of the Caesarians and the Roman people. After establishing themselves as a Triumvirate, eliminating their opposition by proscription and at the battle of Philippi, their alliance dissipated. Lepidus’ troops deserted to Octavian’s side, leaving the triumvirs Octavian and Antony at odds. Octavian began a propaganda campaign against Antony that ultimately led to his defeat at the Battle of Actium. Octavian’s use of propaganda strived to show Antony as a traitorous foreigner and portray himself as an embodiment of Rome and Roman ideals.…

    • 410 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In conclusion, the senate designated its own fate and I conclude that they were the root cause to the negative effects following the Roman conquests. Their continuous greed left for an unstable city-state, an overall unhappy populous and the ruin of everything it had worth preserving. After more than 100 years of this tug a war between the senate, the people, and those who ultimately wanted to better the entire nation the Roman republic fell, leaving behind some beautiful art and architecture, remarkable literature and most importantly amazing history of people who will never be…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Battle of the Speeches According to John Morley, “Three things matter in a speech - who says it, how he says it, and what he says, and of the three, the latter matters the least.” John understancds that how the speaker presents himself and his ideas can change the side of the crowd, more than any word they could have said. When Brutus and Antony give their funeral speeches in Julius Caesar it is a critical moment for each. Both need to sway the crowd to agree with their perspective.…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar written by William Shakespeare, there are two speeches regarding the same topic that are presented to the public. Both Mark Antony and Brutus delivered speeches after the death of Julius Caesar, consisting of their opinion and explanation of what has happened and why, for the needs of the Roman people. Both of the speeches have a very distinct and different purpose, and appealed to different mental senses of the crowd (Ethos, Logos, and Pathos). As Mark Antony 's words were favored and followed, riots broke out and Rome was indescribably angry and upset upon the tragedy of Julius Caesar. This event foreshadowed the conclusion of the story, and set the scene for the following conflicts that reeked havoc upon Rome…

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays