Persuasive Speech On Supreme Court Justice

Improved Essays
The Supreme Court Justice is a federal Court which is the highest body in the judicial branch. The Supreme Court is made up of a chief justice and eight associate justices, every one of whom are delegated by the president and affirmed by the Senate. Giving the unforeseen circumstances, our current Justice Scalia has unfortunately passed away during 2016 creating the current vacancy. Now we are in a bit of a pickle because the Court is currently split 4 to 4 between conservatives and liberals. Today, I am going to tell you the type of person you should consider when nominating someone to be an effective justice. Judges have an intense profession. They have promised to maintain and respect the laws. What many individuals don't think about is that reality that behind the hammer and the dark robe is a person simply like us yet the judges need to meet a certain criteria.
An effective judge understands his position and works under that
…show more content…
It is the capacity to speak with direction, members of the jury, witnesses and gatherings serenely and respectfully, and the ability to listen to and consider what is said on all sides of a far from being obviously true recommendation. An applicant ought to display the accompanying parts of appropriate legal demeanor: Patience, receptiveness, civility, consideration, mettle, reliability, immovability, understanding, empathy, quietude and sound judgment. Those qualities ought to be exhibited reliably. Intelligence is the ability to know and apply lawful guidelines, investigations and systems to various actualities and conditions, and the capacity rapidly to see, grasp, and see new ideas and thoughts. In addition, there ought to be no doubt about a candidate's personal or expert

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Seatac Persuasive Speech

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages

    More Canadians than ever seem to prefer flying out of U. S. airports to reach their destinations. This is largely due to the cost efficiency of catching a flight from a facility such as SeaTac Airport instead of a Canadian airport. If you are driving to SeaTac to catch a flight, you probably wish to find a parking facility with affordable rates, and you’ll certainly want to be sure that your car is left in a safe place. Like countless fellow Canadians, you may well appreciate the low prices, convenience, and other benefits of leaving your vehicle at an off-site SeaTac Airport parking lot, such as Aeroparking’s Park & Fly lot. Quick Access to SeaTac Airport One of the top benefits of long-term parking with Aeroparking is the quick trip…

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Glossip Vs Midazolam

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In many ways, the Supreme Court acts as both moral and legal arbiter of the nation. Supreme Court decisions all have the potential to have a tremendous impact on the lives of Americans. Some decisions have transformed American society. On April 29, 2015, the Supreme Court Case of Glossip v. Gross was argued.…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The U.S. Supreme Court is the highest federal court in America. The court consists of The Chief Justice of the U.S. with eight associate judges all nominated by the President of the U.S. They evaluate laws according to and try cases pertaining to the Constitution. The hierarchy under the U.S. Supreme Court is Appellate Courts, Trial Courts, and Federal Courts and boards outside of the Judicial Branch. The Supreme Court rules whether or not it is permitted under the Constitution.…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Have you ever heard of the phrase “supreme court”? Well, in the judicial branch of the United States government, the phrase is an everyday thing for them. This is because they work in law and, more specifically, the supreme justices of court. Basically, it’s their job to serve up justice. This type of thing, was what Thurgood Marshall ended up doing for a living.…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Merit Selection In Texas

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages

    When our founding fathers created the American Constitution, it was very clear that they wanted the judicial system to be free from political influence. There are many opinions on how to achieve this goal: appointment by the governor, election by the voters and the merit selection. The merit select is a method of choosing judges using a nonpartisan commission of locate, investigate, evaluate and recruit applicants for the judicial system. Once the applicants have been selected the governor then makes the final decision. The selected judge serves a specific amount of time (typically one term) and then placed on a ballot, not as candidate but instead to ask voters if the judges should remain in office.…

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Matt, Wow! These are certainly some elaborate ideas on what could be done to market Constitution Day, however, how many of these players would care? Do you not think that the person’s speech about Constitution Day would fall on deaf ears? If you were standing out there as one of those players, what were your thoughts be during this speech?…

    • 228 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On August 29th 2011, Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg visited the Southern Methodist University Dedman School of Law. During an interview with Dean John B. Attanasio, she discussed her confirmation process and commented on the different milieu's that candidates have faced when nominated for a seat on the Supreme Court. Ginsburg explained that “[Between] 1993 and 1994, the climate was so different from the way it is today... The vote on me was 93 to 3. Today my ACLU connection would most likely disqualify me.…

    • 1530 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Selective Incorporation

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages

    While the ideal example of a democracy places the decisions of government in citizen’s hands, the United States rarely does as such. For example, the Supreme Court, while influenced by public approval and public opinion, isolates itself from the media and public in two specific ways. Its Justices, appointed by the president, are indirect methods for people to get what they want from the highest branch of the Judiciary Branch. Similar to the method and processes used to elect a president through the Electoral College, the Supreme Court works in a way that places the power of the government in educated individuals’ hands as opposed to the direct power of votes in an election for a state governor. It indirectly allows people to influence Court…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Supreme Court Influence

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Powers and Influences of the Supreme Court Founding father Alexander Hamilton once stated that he believed that the Judicial Branch would be the weak link of the three government branches. However, the branch is much more powerful than Hamilton could have ever expected. The Supreme Court has a lot of power, including judicial review that helps them be empowered when it comes to checks and balances. They also have the ability to grant a writ of certiorari to have cases sent up for a review.…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Finally, the Judicial is made up of courts and judges, which the judges aren’t elected, unlike the president are, but they are decided by the president and will be approved by the senate. From the help of the U.S. Constitution, the U.S. government was divided into three…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Constitution of the United States is best understood as the product of a balancing act between the Founders’ desire to avoid a tyranny and their recognition of the need to form a strong government that would ensure national stability and prosperity. The Appointments Clause of the Constitution fits within this framework nicely. Article II, Section 2, Clause II of the Constitution states that “the President…shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint… Judges of the supreme Court.” The clause establishes a clear division of power between the executive and legislative branches in nominating and confirming Supreme Court Justices.…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mrs. Abbott walked home from town with the newspaper tucked under her arm. She had just had to pay an extra tax to purchase it. A new tax that the British had put on several items, including newspapers, legal documents and even playing cards had been causing a commotion in the town. This was a problem that had just occurred and made everyone in the colonies furious. It wasn’t even the extra money that she had to pay that bothered her, it was the fact that England had not gotten approval from the colonial legislatures to levy the tax.…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    First, a judge has to be nominated by the President (stated in Article II Section 2 in the U.S. Constitution) Obama can replace whomever he wants to (filling in for Justice Scalia) Once the President has nominated a judge, the Senate Judiciary Committee needs to confirm and the President needs to appoint the new judge. Secondly, the Judiciary Committee has a three step process as to confirming a supreme court judge. Firstly, the Committee does an investigation into the judge’s background. Next, the Committee will hold a public hearing in which the judge is questioned and gives testimonies about everything from his or her judicial philosophy to his or her stand on abortion.…

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    They need to be loyal to the rule of law because of procedural fairness. It is difficult to treat same kind of cases the same way and different cases differently because there are other factors that play into each crime, but the court should be consistent with prior decisions. Judges do not have full discretion because they have guidelines they need to rule by. Judges cannot go below or above sentencing guidelines. The way the use their discretion is by the mitigating and aggravating factors that prosecutors and defense attorneys present.…

    • 2082 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Throughout our history, there has been a concurring question, in which the burden has weighed heavy the shoulders of many citizens. Should Supreme Court judges be elected or appointed? In the process of this debate, a main concern of the overall argument shadows the question that if today’s method of selection is constitutional and publicly acceptable. In order to keep the public content and still have a reliable court system, there are many factors that are taken into place, which is also one of the reasons why the answer to this question has yet to be justified. In addition, there is an equal amount of supporters on either side who each claim their position is the most ethical and reasonable choice.…

    • 2056 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays