Persuasive Speech On Miranda Rights

Decent Essays
Have you ever heard about the Miranda Rights? Most people have heard of the Miranda Rights. But even though many people have heard of them, few people have actually witnessed it. Everyone needs to know what the Miranda Rights are because they are your rights and you need to know them. Everyone should have the Miranda Rights read to them. People should have the right to remain silent. They should have a right to have a lawyer present when being questioned by the police. Miranda Rights are more than words, which means they are more than just words on a paper, they are they are the things you have a right to. Everyone should have the Miranda Rights read to them. You should know the rights because they are your rights. You deserve to know your rights. If you don't know them, you won't know what you can or cannot do. That is why everybody deserves to know their rights as a person. People should have the right to remain silent when being questioned by the police. If someone doesn't want to talk, they shouldn't have to. If they don't have anything to say, they shouldn't have to talk. It should be a right, not something you have to do. People deserve to have a lawyer …show more content…
That means that the Miranda Rights are more than just words on a piece of paper, they are your rights. People deserve to have the Miranda Rights read to them because they have to know their rights. People have the right to remain silent when being questioned by the police. People have a right to have a lawyer present. You deserve to know your rights so that you know what you can and cannot do. Everyone deserves to know their rights. If you get in trouble with the law, you will know that you have the right to remain silent when being questioned by the police and you will have the right to an attorney.These are all your rights, so you need to know them. If you are ever in court, you will know your rights and what you are allowed and not allowed to

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Summary Of In Re Gault

    • 170 Words
    • 1 Pages

    These rights include the notice of the charges, the right to have counsel, the right to confront and question witnesses, and the protection from self-incrimination. At the close of the…

    • 170 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The criminal has the privilege to have a sensible safeguard set for the wrongdoing he or she perpetrated and as indicated by the genuine flight hazard which he or she may force. In 1963 a man known as Ernesto Arturo Miranda was captured of charges he actually admited nightfall of interrigation, and was sentenced, and sentenced 20-30 years. Miranda's court apointed lawyer contended taht he was not educated he has a privilege to insight, and his admission was not volontary. The Arizona Incomparable Court ruled upon this case, and announced that Miranda was unconscious of the rights allowed under the fifth amendent's self implication provision, and the sixth alterations right to a lawyer.…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Television shows and movies have depicted the scenario where a suspect is arrested and read their Miranda rights. The process of reading a suspect their rights appears to be critical before a suspect is handcuffed and placed into police custody. The podcast entitled Miranda v Arizona by the author South East Texas CJ (2015) highlights why reading suspects their rights is so important. Miranda V Arizona was a case involving a female victim who was restrained, kidnapped, and raped in the year of 1963 in Phoenix Arizona. The woman was released near her home.…

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Not telling accused persons of their rights is a violation of the constitution. The amendments state: “No person...shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself...without due process of law...” “the accused shall enjoy the right to...have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor..”…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Miranda warning includes what rights we have when we are being arrested or interrogated. Police officers or other law enforcement officers must tell a person their Miranda rights during an arrest. After the warning is given to someone being arrested, the person also has the right to speak to an attorney. These rights became a part of the Fifth and Six amendments that already existed in our U.S. Constitution.…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Miranda Vs Arizona Essay

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The ruling of the Supreme Court case of Miranda v. Arizona helped justify the full knowledge of legal and citizen rights that a defendant has in court. The case aided both the detained suspects and police officers/suspects with the defendants being aware of what rights they have while their under custody while legal authority knew and recited what they have to say to an individual that place in…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Miranda Vs Arizona Essay

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages

    You have a right to an attorney. If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed for you" (" 'Miranda' Rights"). The law enforcement personnel must warn the individual prior to any investigation using the Miranda Warning. The Miranda rights are the right to remain silent and the right to an attorney, which are stated in the Miranda…

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Newton (2004) 369 F.3d 659; see Allen v. Roe (2002) 305 F.3d 1046 (where the objectively reasonable need be based on what the officer knew at the time of questioning); see also United States v. Jones (2001) 154 F.2d 617 (likewise, holding the public exception applicable where police knew the suspect had a firearm in the apartment unattended with children present). In determining the objectively reasonable need, courts consider whether the defendant might have or recently have had a weapon and that someone other than the police might gain access to that weapon and inflict harm. (United States v. Williams (2007) 483 F.3d 425.) Accordingly, Miranda warnings are not required where there’s an objectively reasonable need in protecting the police or public from immediate danger and statements stemming from custodial interrogation must not be…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In addition, the Miranda rights are provided under the 5th amendment, which further ensure proper due process and protects a person’s right to liberty. Due process in the 5th amendment happens through court proceedings and protects someone suspected of a crime. With the 14th amendment, due process is a given right to limit the governments interference with, and control over, personal affairs of the…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Miranda V. Arizona

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The infringement of Miranda’s rights by the police granted Miranda the right to appeal and challenge the verdict rendered in the initial case. On appeal, Miranda’s lawyer pointed out how the police failed in their role of informing Miranda of his right to remain silent, the right to be represented by a lawyer, and anything he says can be used against him in a court of law. The landmark ruling by the Supreme Court in 1966 pivoted in favor of the defendant by a majority ruling of 5 – 4. The broad ruling held the police at fault for not exercising proper principles of interrogation, highlighting the need for law enforcement officers to make specific points clear to a suspect before questioning (Bloom…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Miranda Rights help protect citizens fifth and sixth amendments. The fifth amendment protects citizens from being forced to be witness against himself, while the sixth amendment assures that those arrested have a right to a public and speedy trial (Doc E). Together, the fifth amendment protects against self-incrimination and the sixth amendment assures that those arrested can not be held in jail indefinitely. The Miranda Warning read by officers specifically states that after one is made aware of their Miranda Rights, any confession or statements can be used against oneself lawfully (Doc J). Consequently, the Miranda ruling assures that one is fully aware of their rights and are also aware of the consequences if they choose to self-incriminate after being read their…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Because many citizens do not know their rights, the court enforced that all government officials inform citizens of their right against self-incrimination the 5th Amendment. Also, suspects must be told that they have a right to an attorney their 6th Amendment to protect the rest of the rights a citizen may not be aware…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Exclusionary Rule

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This includes the right to remain silent, anything you say may be…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Five Amendments

    • 1399 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Whereas the Fourth Amendment uses probable cause to set up if a crime is, has, or is about to occur and an arrest can be made. Then the Fifth Amendment comes into play, with the questioning of a person who has been arrested and the rights to the arrested person, specifically the reading of Miranda Rights. In 1966, Ernesto Miranda’s civil rights from the Fifth and Sixth were found to have been violated during the investigation and following interrogation. The Supreme Court determined that anyone who is in custody and being questioned needs to be read his or her specific rights, which included: “You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law.…

    • 1399 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The People vs. Larry Flynt Americans value their freedom, most especially their freedom of speech and how their Constitution protects such freedom. Speeches like hate speech, speech plus, symbolic speech, seditious speech and the like are part of their freedom of speech. For the purposes of this paper, the film to be discussed is The People vs. Larry Flynt. This paper will also discuss the interrelationship between media, identities, and politics depicted in the said movie. Brief Summary of the Film…

    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays