• Home Page
  • Hippocratic Argument Against Euthanasia

Hippocratic Argument Against Euthanasia

Improved Essays
Show More
Introduction:
The seraphic, illuminating Pearl S. Buck stimulates our moral compass and arouses compunction with the following quote: “Euthanasia is a long, smooth-sounding word, and it conceals its danger as long, smooth words do, but the danger is there, nevertheless.” The nescient who dive into the murky, precarious waters of euthanasia transgress all concepts of morality and ethics, thereby devastating mankind’s longevity that a plethora of medical professionals have arduously crafted. For the love of unparalleled well-being, make not only the right choice, but the righteous one, by standing with me in the fight against euthanasia!

Euthanasia Negation CLAIM EVIDENCEWARRANT

Euthanasia is an immoral act for doctors. The Hippocratic Oath (translated by Michael J. North, M.S., M.S.L.S., Head of Rare Books & Early Manuscripts in the History and Medicine Division at the U.S. National Library of Medicine) enlightens us: “I will not give a lethal drug to anyone if I am asked, nor will I advise such a plan; and similarly I will not give a woman a pessary to cause an abortion.” The sanctity of life enshrined in the words of this pivotal oath serve as the moral guide for the practice of medicine. According to Leon Kass, M.D., Ph.D., former Chairman of the President's Council on Bioethics: “The prohibition against killing patients . . . stands as the first promise of self-restraint sworn to in the Hippocratic Oath, as …show more content…
The fact that “about 900 people annually are administered lethal substances without having given explicit consent, and in one jurisdiction, almost 50% of cases of euthanasia are not reported” according to https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ exacerbates the germane menace. The British Broadcasting Corporation avers that “an Age Concern dossier in 2000 showed that doctors put Do Not Resuscitate orders in place on elderly patients without consulting them or their families” and

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Dr Brian Pollard Physician Assisted Suicide Summary
    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Dr Brian Pollard Physician Assisted Suicide Summary

    In the article from Margaret Somerville, “Would Euthanasia Damage Doctors” she examines the impact of euthanasia upon physicians and the medical community's…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Nancy Morrison's Case Essay: Voluntary Active Euthanasia
    • 1467 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Nancy Morrison's Case Essay: Voluntary Active Euthanasia

    It is clear that the utmost importance in any medical context is the relationship between the healthcare practitioner and the patient. The duty of a physician is to adhere to certain principles of medical ethics namely the principles of respect for autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice. By examining the case study involving Dr. Nancy Morrison, one can observe that these principles are often ambiguous when referring to the issue of whether she committed voluntary active euthanasia or nonvoluntary active euthanasia. Thus, the thesis will aim to exemplify that ultimately Dr. Nancy Morrison was culpable for her actions. To give some context to the issue, Paul Mills was a 65-year-old individual suffering from terminal esophageal cancer.…

    • 1467 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Physician Assisted Suicide Is Always Wrong Analysis
    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Physician Assisted Suicide Is Always Wrong Analysis

    I will neither give a deadly drug to anybody who asked for it, nor will I make a suggestion to this effect” (Anderson, Ryan n.p.).This is a vital statement of Anderson’s writing, and a crucial piece of why this writer believes it is unethical and unprogressive for physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia to exist. Anderson believes that if the philosophy of euthanasia was put into full affect it would endanger anyone who is sick: the “weak and the venerable.” He believes that doctors and the people who decides who lives or dies such as judges have an emphatic responsibility to protect…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Medical Aid In Dying Research Paper
    • 1627 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Medical Aid In Dying Research Paper

    Death With Dignity: A Commentary Sergej Jagodin Millersville University Medical Aid in Dying: A Commentary The ability to choose when to die is not a topic that is heavily discussed throughout a person’s life. What constitutes dying early and on one’s own terms? Is it moral? Is it right?…

    • 1627 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Euthanasia And Physician Assisted Suicide
    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Euthanasia And Physician Assisted Suicide

    Many wonder if euthanasia is right and moral and if it is not what should be done when being faced with this situation. I think the best way to look at physician-assisted euthanasia is through consequentialism and deontology. It’s important we look at the consequences of physician-assisted suicide because they are literally the difference between life and death. A patient that is gravely ill or in a coma may be diagnosed and given a time limit until death, however, some patients have surprised their doctors.…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    What Is Physician Assisted Suicide?
    • 2007 Words
    • 8 Pages

    What Is Physician Assisted Suicide?

    I. Physician-assisted suicide, under various names and colloquial definitions, has been a documented ethical issue for centuries – not to mention an undocumented ethical issue since the hypothetical dawn of life. By common understanding, physician-assisted suicide is death either directly or indirectly permitted or carried out by a physician. In simple terms, an “out” is provided. For this reason, it is often associated with chronic pain or terminal illness. Suicide where the doctor in charge is directly involved is perhaps the first situation which comes to mind when one thinks of euthanasia.…

    • 2007 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Physician Assisted Suicide Argumentative Essay
    • 2317 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Physician Assisted Suicide Argumentative Essay

    Physician-assisted suicide (PAS) is the voluntary termination of a person’s life with the assistance of a physician in a controlled environment allows a quick, painless, and dignified death for those suffering from terminal illnesses. The arguments against physician-assisted suicide are ineffective because it gives terminally ill patients the right a dignified death. Today, five states have legalized physician-assisted suicide, sparing families in those states from watching their loved ones go through unbearable suffering and pain. The question of assisted suicide, and later physician-assisted suicide, has been long debated.…

    • 2317 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Argumentative Essay On Euthanasia
    • 2101 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Argumentative Essay On Euthanasia

    If doctors are enabled the decision to terminate a life on behalf of a unconscious patient, they would be then granted a power over society that not only breaches the Hippocratic Oath, but also empowers them to “play God”. This responsibility could then reflect upon society, altering their views and their trust within doctors and medical professionals as they could then be seen as “providers of death” (Cosic, 2003. 25) In addition to this, a doctor’s decision to terminate a life may not rely on the condition and best interests of the patient, but instead of amount of hospital beds and facilities that are…

    • 2101 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Brock's Argument For The Moral Permissibility Of Voluntary Active Euthanasia
    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Brock's Argument For The Moral Permissibility Of Voluntary Active Euthanasia

    In this essay, I will contend that Brock’s argument in favor of the moral permissibility of voluntary active euthanasia (VAE) is sound and that Brock offers persuasive responses to the objection that (A) VAE is an act which involves the deliberate killing of an innocent person and (B) the deliberate killing of an innocent person is always morally wrong. To achieve this, I will begin by summarizing Brock’s argument for the moral permissibility of VAE. Then, I will synthesize the objection to Brock’s argument and Brock’s subsequent responses. Finally, I will describe why I find Brock’s responses persuasive. Brock’s argument for the moral permissibility of VAE can be constructed as follows: (1) VAE is supported by the “values of patient well-being…

    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Essay On Physician Assisted Suicide And Euthanasia
    • 1312 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Essay On Physician Assisted Suicide And Euthanasia

    The discussion on physician-assisted death (PAD) and euthanasia has been fenced with controversy whether by the media or in philosophy. Considerably, the arguments that surround this issue has increased periodically due to the fact that health care and medicine has evolved continuously to safeguard not just patients and families, but all health care providers as well. Physician assisted death is “the voluntary termination of one’s own life by administration of a lethal substance with the direct or indirect assistance of a physician” (Westefeld et al., 2013, p. 539). Oftentimes, PAD is erroneously used interchangeably with euthanasia. According to Dieterle, euthanasia occurs when the active instigator of death is the physician.…

    • 1312 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Legalizing Active Euthanasia
    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of Legalizing Active Euthanasia

    The procedure of active euthanasia must be taught to physicians, since there has been “botched” euthanasia where patient didn’t die” (Somerville). This lead to medical schools not only teach students how to cure but also how to kill patients by injecting lethal dose. The legalization would also make “an exception to the norm that we must not kill each other” (Somerville). Human beings should not kill each other, let alone physicians whose job is to preserve life. Physicians are put into an environment where they can legally end a life, rather than an environment where they can improve…

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    James Rachels And Steinbock's Active And Passive Euthanasia
    • 1667 Words
    • 7 Pages

    James Rachels And Steinbock's Active And Passive Euthanasia

    In this essay, Steinbock tries to refute the claims about euthanasia presented by James Rachels, and tries to show how Rachel’s misinterpreted the American Medical Association 's doctrine regarding euthanasia. Steinbock states that contrary to Rachel’s interpretation, the AMA does not endorse any type of euthanasia, and that the termination of life is never the goal in a professional medical practice. Steinbock argues that Rachel 's error in his essay was the linkage of ending “extraordinary care” and passive euthanasia. Steinbock says that stoppage of extraordinary care or treatment that would prolong one 's life and creates burden for that patient is not always linked to the intention of death. Steinbock says “there can be a point (to the cessation of life-prolonging treatment) other than an endeavor to bring about the patient’s death,” Steinbock continues to provide examples where withholding treatment does not necessarily mean that this decision was made for the cession of life.…

    • 1667 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    Consequentialist Theory Of Euthanasia
    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Consequentialist Theory Of Euthanasia

    In this paper, we are going to present an analysis regarding medical ethics, specifically Euthanasia and we will try to describe the position of a Consequentialist, Deontologist, and Virtue ethics philosophers and what their decision will be in reference to this dilemma. Subsequently we will compare and choose which position is the most appropriate to handle this ethical dilemma and explain why the others positions do not work. We will do our best to present enough evidence to support the reasoning behind our selection. Anything that involves a decision about ending a person’s life regardless of the circumstances, presents ethical dilemmas on how or why this can be done or even worse accepted.…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Hippocratic Oath: A Universal Code Of Ethics
    • 1230 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Hippocratic Oath: A Universal Code Of Ethics

    In a discussion about the Hippocratic Oath (“the Oath”), we consider the opposing perspectives presented by Robert Veatch in The Basics of Bioethics and Daniel Sokol, a medical ethicist who authored the BBC article, A guide to the Hippocratic oath. In this essay, we answer the question of whether the Oath is relevant as a universal code of ethics for today’s physicians. I argue that the Hippocratic Oath does not appear to be relevant to modern medical practice because 1) its philosophical basis is limited to its historical context and 2) it contains problematic language; however, the Oath does contain statements about the duty of a physician to a patient that can create the basis through which to construct a modern, relevant code of ethics…

    • 1230 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Arguments Against Legalizing Euthanasia
    • 1295 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Arguments Against Legalizing Euthanasia

    Over the past decade, the idea of euthanasia has become increasingly prevalent in modern medicine. There are many instances where a patient will contract an incurable disease or fall into an irreversible coma. In these cases, some may consider euthanasia if it is available. Many people disagree on the necessity of euthanasia. The common belief by many is that euthanasia should be legalized.…

    • 1295 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings