Why Is Gun Control Important

Decent Essays
Guns are an important significance for the human. People believe that guns have been used as deadly weapons in battle since the first gun was created. However, the roles of guns play in the modern society have long been debated. As the shooting continually happened in the world, people begin to attach importance to consider whether we need gun control. Whereas according to a Pew Foundation report, 79% of male gun owners, 80% of female gun owners, and 64% of people whose family members have guns, they all felt safe in their lives. Should people really need gun control? In my perspective, there are several critical reasons why gun control is unnecessary.
There are several opinions to prove that we don’t need gun control. First, The majority of
…show more content…
To begin with, guns are not safe. There are those people who believe that guns have no role in the hands of people, if we don 't have gun control, anyone can easily get guns. It is dangerous that if the people who don’t have enough knowledge of using guns. Gun owners are more dangerous than others who don’t have weapons, even though the gun owners are victims of the crimes. Similarly, guns can cause unintentional crimes. Gun control implementation is a great chance to avoid guns fall into the hands of kids, and it will reduce the results in some accidents. Also, gun control can reduce more gun deaths. More guns lead to more suicides. Suicides are highly using with guns, as it is much easily used in immediately when people are impetuous. Thus, restrictions on guns will likely reduce the number of such crimes and protect society security. In short, some people believe we should have gun …show more content…
To begin with, gun control is useless for gun safety. There are many murder weapons to put us in danger, such as transportation, pest control, knife, and so on. If we only want to control gun ownerships to prevent harm, we also need to think about control other murder weapons. Also, if we have gun control, kids still have chances to play guns, if their parents have legal guns at home. It states that gun control is helpless to avoid kids to use guns. After that, gun control is not a guarantee of reducing deaths. To implement gun control, it means governments restrict the sales, purchases, owning and carrying guns. It is not only ineffective in reducing death rates, but that increases with high speed. Similarly, criminals do not care laws as they illegally do many other things. Criminals will still find a way to obtain guns if they want to do, and it makes other citizens without any weapons to use in defense. Also, gun control will create another income resources of criminals. They create black markets to sell illegal guns, and it will surely develop. Moreover, guns are not the only weapons that criminals use. Criminals will find more harmful weapons, and it makes the gun control laws even more unavailing and helpless. Finally, gun control is not enough. Guns don 't kill people; people kill people. Guns are simple tools used by people, and they have no ability to harm anyone. Thus, even if there is a gun control law in a place,

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    They would rather buy a gun off the black market because more than likely the serial number will not be present on the weapon. It will be scratched off so the weapon cannot be tracked. “The result of these studies appear to indicate that gun control laws have no effect on criminals.” (Alters 1) As a result, even though there are gun laws in place, criminals find a way around it. Criminals always have. This is often argued by people since they tend to ignore the fact that criminals will always have weapons.…

    • 1892 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Lott argues that more gun control would do absolutely nothing, and be very ineffective. Lott says that criminals oftentimes procure their weapons illegally, and tightening gun restrictions would not do enough to completely stop illegal firearm trafficking. Therefore, gun violence would not be lowered. Lott compares this idea to illegal drug trafficking. Even though many narcotics, including marijuana, heroin, cocaine, and methamphetamines, are illegal in the United States, there is a high availability of each of these illegal substances.…

    • 1331 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Why should the government take away people 's guns rights when they use them for self-defense LaPierre and others argue, “that not only gun-carrying individuals ward off attackers, but criminals are deterred because they do not know who does or does not carry a concealed weapon.”(Mantel 9). If criminals are scared that good people are carrying guns also, they will be less likely to commit a crime. If criminals do try and shoot others, there will be good people there to protect themselves with their guns. The streets will be safer and allow society to become better however others believe otherwise. Allowing people to carry guns on the street will increase the crime rate many believe.…

    • 1530 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    People should have the right to protect themselves, their families, and their property, however there are guns that can be purchased that have no real purpose unless you are planning a mass shooting. Of course some people just purchase these because they believe they are cool. I agree that these should be illegal to sell. Gun control would be great, but I believe it is an impossible goal. In a perfect world we would be able to get control, or better yet never have invented such a violent weapon.…

    • 1503 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Why Is Gun Control Bad

    • 1702 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Also that gun control needs to be put in place in order to keep guns out of the wrong hands. The people on this argument are wrong because, first off they need to know that guns aren't evil. Guns aren't evil because they cannot think, speak, or reason, guns are an inanimate object, guns are mainly just a piece of plastic and metal, and is not capable of evil acts upon human beings alone, therefore guns are not evil, the people use guns the way that is illegal are evil. Another reason these arguments are wrong is because criminals can get guns with ease even if gun control was in effect, they already do get guns illegally anyways, what’s going to stop them with gun control in place? Because of this gun control arms the criminals who have no regard for the law and disarms the law abiding citizens who follow the law, when the other side says to get guns out of the “wrong hands”, they already have guns in their own, lastly according to an article about gun control states: “In a perfect world, gun control would mean going house to house throughout the nation and taking away every single firearm, including muzzle loaders.…

    • 1702 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Many criminals are willing to do whatever it takes to get what they want, and mentally ill individuals have no ethics to guide their decisions. Therefore, The United States should require mandatory, universal background checks, mental health screenings, and exams for all who wish to purchase guns. Guns should not be banned, however. Citizens of the United States do have a Constitutional right to carry and bear arms, which includes handguns. But, it’s important to get guns out of the hands of the people who wish to do harm to others or who are very likely to do harm to others.…

    • 1502 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Why Guns Should Be Banned

    • 1761 Words
    • 8 Pages

    After obtaining guns, children and adults collect them and proceed to improve their accuracy in shooting, but getting rid of them would make the world a dangerous place. Many people who believe that guns are the leading cause of death in the United States, are incorrect. A gun is not a person, it has no feelings nor can it move on its own it cannot be personified nor be blamed for any of the actions. A gun must be wielded by a person and that person is the one responsible for pulling the trigger. If guns were banned and somehow a criminal couldn’t get his hand on one illegally, they can still kill.…

    • 1761 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The criminals would just want to get the hands on the guns even more so they can sell it at a high rate for profit. Criminals did the same thing when probation started. The government would just help these criminals get more money and have many of their good citizens dislike them. This ban of guns will also help criminals get away with more crimes because now the no one can have guns the government does not know who the gun belongs to when a crime is committed because they could not monitor who has one. “The official report on the worst mass shooting in America history concluded that a limit on magazine capacity…

    • 1350 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Without gun control chances are, criminals won’t break into your house as much. Why? Because of the uncertainty of whether you have a gun or not. Everyone with a gun will have a way to defend themselves, should anything happen to them. Criminals will still have access to guns, they don’t listen to the law anyways.…

    • 1235 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    No laws will stop or prevent these shootings from ever happening, but just take more and more freedoms away from the people. Why should the American people have to suffer with more restrictions on guns because of the criminal’s actions, when they should be the ones who get punished not the good…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays