Persuasive Essay Pro Death Penalty

Improved Essays
In life we are always taught to treat others the way we would want to be treated.Should people take this into consideration when the death penalty comes into play though?Deciding whether the death penalty should be legal or not is mostly based off morals,beliefs,and existing laws already.I believe the death penalty is beneficial to our justice system.These benefits include tax payers paying less towards prisoners,a decrease in violent crime rates, and some closure for the victims families and loved ones.

Tax payer’s money is spent every year on prisons and their inmates.While there may be some advantages such as rehabilitation or lesser criminals,I do not believe that people should have to pay for inmates who lost their privileges due to severe violent crimes.According to Deathpenalty.org, California taxpayers pay $90,000 more per death row prisoner each year than they do for other inmates.To spend that much money on one person alone is outrageous.Especially considering the fact that the inmate brought it upon themselves.

Arellano 2
With high risks at stake, committing a crime is not worth getting the death penalty.People who are aware of the consequences might think twice before they act. For instance, Deathpenalty.procon.org states that on the early
…show more content…
That is one of the main reasons the death penalty is so crucial to our justice

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The very person who is handed the death sentence undoubtedly has a skewed view of the importance of life,…

    • 248 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hammurabi Punishment

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The death penalty is appropriate in deterrence of that criminal that they will not commit again. The death penalty is also deterrence for those wanting to know the consequences of their actions and if the legal system imposed the death penalty on all murder crimes then murder rates would fall. The death penalty is just that and that’s what it was put in place for is to deter others from committing the same crime. By allowing states to abolish the death penalty then we are allowing for more murders and more crime to be committed because the fear of death is now…

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On opposition, articles in the Journal of Bioethics says that executing a person to save up money is not acceptable, also it would place physicians in the position as executers, furthermore, even people on death should have choice to donate their organs without coercion. Using the organs from death-row inmates would save many lives for people who already have lost their hopes to live a normal life. Nevertheless, it is unpredictable how a person would feel if he founds that he has an organ from death-row inmate. Changing the method of execution to an execution as organ…

    • 1244 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In most of case, death penalty is more likely to discourage criminals to not to do bad things. According to law.jrank.org “The purpose of punishment is to discourage a person from committing a crime. Punishment is supposed to make criminal behavior less attractive and more risky.” For most of criminal, death penalty is a kind of warn for criminals, to make them fear, to decrease the inclination that criminals do serious crimes, indirectly keep the safety of ourselves as…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Another reason one might oppose the death penalty is because of costs. I originally was under the impression that it costs more to house an inmate for the rest of their life rather than put them to death. This is not true. In states like California, prosecuting death-penalty cases cost upwards of $184 million more each year than life-without-parole cases (Fischer). This is a stark contrast to the $47,900 a year it costs to house an inmate for one year in the same state ("California’s Annual Costs to Incarcerate an Inmate in…

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One side views the expense for death penalty is less than sentencing an inmate to life in prison. For instance, Justice for All (JFA) states, LWOP cases will cost on estimate $1.2 million to $3.6 million more than similar death penalty cases (Sharp 1997, 1). Overtime cost to incapacitate an inmate will cost more than execution. In addition, incarcerating an inmate for life will as well worsen the overcrowding in prison cells. For example, due to overcrowding, there is a lack of space and resources, while requiring a prisoner to be provided a cell, food, clothing, and extra guard time (Messerli 2016, 1).…

    • 1265 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In a study done by NBC news, results showed that in 2 cases of the death penalty the overall prices rounded well over a million dollars, while in cases where inmates were put on lockup for the same amount of time that it took as the death penalty case the average price for a inmate was nearly half at around 600k in which both cases were the same time span of 14 years. This information proves that the death penalty is much more expensive, and in which the money wasted in these cases could be put to a more efficient use especially knowing that that money is being supported by the taxpayers: everyone in the community doing well in the community which has to pay for a mistake that someone else did. Stopping the use of death penalty could save taxpayers a lot more money which can then be used for better things such as to enforce the law or make their community better, as well as all the time wasted during the cases could be more efficiently used to go thru various cases. Another reason why the death penalty is inferior is because it does not stop criminals. In a article by Notis she claims how crime rate is actually higher in states where the death penalty is available, therefore proving this punishment does not intimidate or stop criminals, Another reason why this punishment does not scare criminals could be that only a fraction of the people set on death row are actually killed which gives criminals the idea and mindset that they won 't get killed while they continue to do their crimes and why would they make the death penalty avalible if it is not really used.…

    • 1140 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When it comes to the topic of the Death Penalty you have to ask yourself the morality of what you are doing, and if other human beings should have the right to take the life of someone else for what you deem as wrong above and beyond the normal crime. From an economic standpoint you realize that it is extremely inefficient not only in terms of time, but in the sheer amount of money it takes for the death penalty to actually be handed down making it more economically inefficient. I. Monetary Cost a. Texas i. Being the state with the largest amount of executions I deemed it fitting to be seen as a key component of defining how much it really costs to actually have the death penalty take place. ii.…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To forcefully end someone’s life is the most heinous thing a person can do. That is, according to many, unless they deserve it. Murder is wrong, and those who commit murder are bad. So through some logic, the government sees fit that murdering murderer’s is ok.…

    • 1676 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    An article written in the Denver post states that “Between 1977-2002, 250 million dollars was spent to carry out the sentences of 11 prisoners executed in California.” Additionally, this is such a substantial amount of money that could have been spent on government jail programs or put towards other safety…

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    People live in a society that is surrounded by violent behavior for that reason the justice uses the death penalty to send out a positive message for those who tend to commit capital offence. Capital punishment is not an act we wish to place on a single soul, but it is the best way to keep the killer out of society and prevent any further murders. There is no concrete evidence of either positive or negative effect, but this does not mean it would not help lower the crime rate. People need to understand that the best way to prevent any possible murders in the future is not let the killer walk free. The death penalty allows us to see the seriousness of a crime and the value of life.…

    • 1630 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Capital Punishment has been a part of American society since we first colonized into the new world. European settlers brought this practice from Great Britain, implementing it into justice system as a means of retribution and deterrence. Today this controversial penalty is legal in only 31 states, dividing our nation. Due to this split of acceptance, the death penalty has become a controversial issue on the grounds of morality and civility. I believe capital punishment should continue to be a legal practice in the United States for it deters future suffering, is an equitable consequence for murder and imparts the ultimate warning to criminals should they kill with premeditation.…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A life is something that we cherish the most. From humans to cats and everywhere in between someone somewhere cares for that life. But sometimes people commit offenses that take the life of another away. This leaves us with the hard decision of what do with those who commit these crimes. Do we take from them what they have taken from another or, do we lock them away for life to let them think about what they have done.…

    • 1954 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A study of Los Angeles County trials has shown that the average trial in which prosecutors demand the death penalty costs $1,898,323, while a murder trial where the death penalty is not sought comes in at $627,322. Death penalty is the most expensive because the constitution requires a long and complex judicial process for any capital cases. The process is required to make sure that innocent men and women are not executed for crimes they did not commit, and also to protect the innocent person from getting executed. According to George Sjostrom, “The cost of the death penalty is too high, both in dollars and in emotional pain,” (192). If we replace the death penalty with a sentence of life without the possibility of parole, it will cost millions less and also ensures that the public is safe and protected and we will also eliminate the risk of…

    • 1307 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Life Behind Bars

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Should the United States continue using the death penalty? The death penalty is the execution of a person by the judicial process as a punishment for an offense which is a capital crime or offense ("For and Against"). Many Americans have been known to describe the death penalty as torture and unethical, a lack of morality, or would describe the inmates as "people" who has made a mistake, just as we are. Truth be told, these inmates that has been sentenced to death row are people who deserves it. The death penalty should be used!…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays