Breast Cancer, Childhood leukemia, Chronic Myeloid leukemia, Lung Cancer, and many other diabolical diseases all have a greater survival rate due to animal testing. Animal testing has enabled the development of many life saving treatments for both humans and animals. Although it is referred to as being cruel and inhuman, there is no accurate alternative method for researching a complete living organism. Animal testing should be continued as a scientific method for saving human lives because it’s less expensive, it produces more precise results, and it saves the lives of millions of humans.
First of all, if animal testing was stopped it would hurt researches with less funds because animal testing is less expensive than the alternatives that …show more content…
Many say that we should test on humans because it would more reliable source. While this may be true in some circumstances, animal testing is just as accurate and we don't need to harm a human in any way. This may be hard for some people to understand, but we live in a society where humans come first and in many cases most people would rather kill a mouse than their family.
Furthermore, animal testing saves the lives of humans. Others may say that finding a cure for a disease isn’t found just from testing on animals. Surely, finding a cure isn’t all animal testing but for medicine, one of the stages is testing the drugs on animals to see their effectiveness. While this sometimes could be fatal, it proves to be a necessary step towards finding the cure. Many may disagree, but animal testing is a necessary evil. For example, every medical breakthrough in the last 100 years has been because of animal testing.
Clearly, animal testing is crucial for saving the lives of humans. It is more reliable, cheaper and it actually works! We should stop pretending that there is a more precise way to test and just except that it is necessary to finding the cures of
First of all, if animal testing was stopped it would hurt researches with less funds because animal testing is less expensive than the alternatives that …show more content…
Many say that we should test on humans because it would more reliable source. While this may be true in some circumstances, animal testing is just as accurate and we don't need to harm a human in any way. This may be hard for some people to understand, but we live in a society where humans come first and in many cases most people would rather kill a mouse than their family.
Furthermore, animal testing saves the lives of humans. Others may say that finding a cure for a disease isn’t found just from testing on animals. Surely, finding a cure isn’t all animal testing but for medicine, one of the stages is testing the drugs on animals to see their effectiveness. While this sometimes could be fatal, it proves to be a necessary step towards finding the cure. Many may disagree, but animal testing is a necessary evil. For example, every medical breakthrough in the last 100 years has been because of animal testing.
Clearly, animal testing is crucial for saving the lives of humans. It is more reliable, cheaper and it actually works! We should stop pretending that there is a more precise way to test and just except that it is necessary to finding the cures of