I. Introduction
A. Child labour although opposed by many, is also promoted by others.
B. It may seem that if one’s children work, it will benefit them as they will be able to take charge of their own life and support themselves; however, by allowing a child to enter the labour force, a parent is in essence harming them long term. If a child is working rather than studying, they are inflicting harm on the economy for themselves and for the generations to come.
C. Even though some people argue that child labour is beneficial, there is strong evidence that child labour should be abolished because it impacts their childhood and it leads to a downturn in the economy.
II. First main point – Children should be allowed to work, it is in their benefit.
TOPIC …show more content…
The percentage of child labor is highly dependent on the demand and supply for it. (Kis-Katos&Schulze,2011)
B. Providing mandatory, free education for the underprivileged up until twelfth grade will decrease child labor by an excessive amount. (Awan, Waqas&Aslam, 2011)
C. The only way to terminate the employment of children is with government intervention. From credit creation to educating the parents, child labor may finally come to an end. (Kis-Katos&Schulze,2011) (Manoranjan,Pal,Tiwari&Bharati,2011) (Guzlar, 2011) (Orkin,2010)
V. Conclusion -
A. Children are willing and able to work , working gives them a sense of responsibility and maturity. However, children should be enjoying their younger years and trying new things in order to discover their true identity and calling in life, rather than simultaneously destroying their future and the future of the economy.
B. Despite the fact that a few individuals contend that child labour is useful, there is solid confirmation that child labour needs to be overthrown on the grounds that it affects their youth and it prompts a downturn in the economy.
C. It can be argued that child labour can be somewhat beneficial to a child but it causes more harm than
A. Child labour although opposed by many, is also promoted by others.
B. It may seem that if one’s children work, it will benefit them as they will be able to take charge of their own life and support themselves; however, by allowing a child to enter the labour force, a parent is in essence harming them long term. If a child is working rather than studying, they are inflicting harm on the economy for themselves and for the generations to come.
C. Even though some people argue that child labour is beneficial, there is strong evidence that child labour should be abolished because it impacts their childhood and it leads to a downturn in the economy.
II. First main point – Children should be allowed to work, it is in their benefit.
TOPIC …show more content…
The percentage of child labor is highly dependent on the demand and supply for it. (Kis-Katos&Schulze,2011)
B. Providing mandatory, free education for the underprivileged up until twelfth grade will decrease child labor by an excessive amount. (Awan, Waqas&Aslam, 2011)
C. The only way to terminate the employment of children is with government intervention. From credit creation to educating the parents, child labor may finally come to an end. (Kis-Katos&Schulze,2011) (Manoranjan,Pal,Tiwari&Bharati,2011) (Guzlar, 2011) (Orkin,2010)
V. Conclusion -
A. Children are willing and able to work , working gives them a sense of responsibility and maturity. However, children should be enjoying their younger years and trying new things in order to discover their true identity and calling in life, rather than simultaneously destroying their future and the future of the economy.
B. Despite the fact that a few individuals contend that child labour is useful, there is solid confirmation that child labour needs to be overthrown on the grounds that it affects their youth and it prompts a downturn in the economy.
C. It can be argued that child labour can be somewhat beneficial to a child but it causes more harm than