To start with, semi-automatic weapon owners engaging in self-defense are taking the law into their own hands, only the military and police forces have that right. Even Obama, the president of world’s most powerful country made a proposal about gun control. If guns are made illegal there would be a huge decrease …show more content…
The majority of unintentional deaths occur in the home when children are playing with a loaded gun in their parent’s absence. And the weapons of choice for drug dealers, and gang members these days are semi-automated handguns, which they are getting illegally. So, banning semi-automated weapons will result in control of crime scenes. In many cases of youth gun violence, they are using multiple weapons, including semi-automated guns and rifles. These guns are purchased legally and are often obtained from family members. In a review of mass shootings in the US, from 62 mass shootings happened during a 30-year period from which 68 semi-automatic handguns and 35 assault weapons were discovered. The only possible way to prevent this is by implementing sensible gun laws. Some people believe that they need guns for self-defense to protect them from assault, rape or murder. A recent study showed that people carrying a gun for self-defense are more likely to be shot during an assault, than an assault victim without a gun. Gun control laws will not prevent criminals from breaking laws or obtaining semi-automatic weapons. Hence, I strongly feel that banning semi-automatic weapons is a right