"It is not the strongest of the species that survives nor the most intelligent but the one most responsive to change."Quoted by evolutionist Charles Darwin. It has long been debated by creationist and evolutionist about change in species, How world was created, and how man has evolved and what are ancestors are from. In this essay I will show the creationist side and evolutionist side to theories of creation and evolution over earth, species and organisms and let you decide your side on your own and maybe change your mind on some of these topics.
Biology.org
The Cambrian theory was a theory that made everything evolve in a short period of time.
Evolutionist do not really believe it ever took place but do consider it and the theory has been questioned. If their ideals our valid sure the theory is evolution but it is a very rapid one and not a long time of creatures and organisms evolving like they have predicted of all organisms. But they argue that it's just an increase in the rate of fossilization. Creationist believe it is valid because it is shown in previous and current fossil records. My opinion is that …show more content…
Evolutionist think and assume that since sediment forms slowly today it has always formed slowly. So that they believe that sedimentation occurs only during very long ages of time in so that means they think the Earth is very old. Creationist believe that because most rocks are very thick the Earth is not old and to back up their point. The flood could form rock layers very fast eroded and placed elsewhere this could explain the thickest in rocks of modern day to back their point up Mount St.Helens that erupted in Washington produced 25 feet of fine layered sediment in an single afternoon. I would have to go with creationist because saying that because sediment forms slowly doesn't mean it has always been that way and theirs honestly not much physical evidence to back their claim
Biology.org
The Cambrian theory was a theory that made everything evolve in a short period of time.
Evolutionist do not really believe it ever took place but do consider it and the theory has been questioned. If their ideals our valid sure the theory is evolution but it is a very rapid one and not a long time of creatures and organisms evolving like they have predicted of all organisms. But they argue that it's just an increase in the rate of fossilization. Creationist believe it is valid because it is shown in previous and current fossil records. My opinion is that …show more content…
Evolutionist think and assume that since sediment forms slowly today it has always formed slowly. So that they believe that sedimentation occurs only during very long ages of time in so that means they think the Earth is very old. Creationist believe that because most rocks are very thick the Earth is not old and to back up their point. The flood could form rock layers very fast eroded and placed elsewhere this could explain the thickest in rocks of modern day to back their point up Mount St.Helens that erupted in Washington produced 25 feet of fine layered sediment in an single afternoon. I would have to go with creationist because saying that because sediment forms slowly doesn't mean it has always been that way and theirs honestly not much physical evidence to back their claim